Developing Multi-Stakeholder Coordination Mechanisms for Educational Equity: Insights from Thailand's Inter-Agency Collaboration Experience
Article Number: e2026072 | Available Online: May 2026 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2026.23.72
Anchalee Srikolchan , Cholvit Jearajit , Suwimon Hengpatana , Wilailak Langka , Sorasun Rungsiyanont , Prapaporn Rojsiriruch , Pimtawan Jantan
Full text PDF |
282 |
135
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. Educational inequality in developing countries requires coordinated responses across multiple agencies, yet existing collaboration frameworks inadequately address capacity disparities and resource constraints common in these contexts. This study explores patterns of multi-stakeholder collaboration for educational equity promotion in Thailand and develops a preliminary coordination framework to enhance partnership effectiveness in resource-constrained environments. Materials/methods. A qualitative case study examined coordination patterns across Thailand's educational equity ecosystem through 64 semi-structured interviews with representatives from government agencies, civil society organizations, the private sector, academic experts, and implementation-level actors. Data collection included document analysis and meeting documentation, with systematic thematic analysis identifying emerging coordination patterns and framework mechanisms. Results. The analysis revealed three interconnected coordination mechanisms: integrated policy coordination, collaborative resource management, and cross-sector capacity development. These mechanisms address common coordination challenges, including procedural fragmentation, resource distribution asymmetries, and monitoring system disconnection. Key patterns suggest that effective partnerships maintain organizational autonomy while enabling collective action, require graduated participation mechanisms accommodating varying organizational capacities, and benefit from explicit linkage between resource allocation and capacity development. |
Conclusion. The preliminary framework suggests potential directions for adapting collaboration theories to developing country contexts, emphasizing organizational complementarity over similarity and graduated participation over uniform requirements. The study offers initial guidance for partnership design accommodating capacity variations while leveraging organizational strengths, though systematic validation across diverse contexts is required before broader implementation.
Keywords: Educational equity, multi-stakeholder collaboration, inter-organizational coordination, partnership framework
ReferencesAinscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
Akyeampong, K., Djangmah, J., Oduro, A., Seidu, A., & Hunt, F. (2007). Access to basic education in Ghana: The evidence and the issues. Country analytic report. Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity (CREATE). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED508809
Ansell, C. (2011). Pragmatist democracy: Evolutionary learning as public philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
Aunger, J. A., Millar, R., Greenhalgh, J., Mannion, R., Rafferty, A. M., & McLeod, H. (2021). Why do some inter-organizational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review. Systematic reviews, 10(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01630-8
Bebbington, A. J., Hickey, S., & Mitlin, D. C. (Eds.). (2008). Can NGOs make a difference? The challenge of development alternatives. Zed Books.
Bell-Brown, A., Watabayashi, K., Kreizenbeck, K., Ramsey, S., Bansal, A., Barlow, W., & Sullivan, S. (2022). An evaluation of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: Lessons learned from SWOG S1415CD. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 11(18), 1313-1321. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2022-0158
Bigsten, A., & Söderbom, M. (2006). What Have We Learned from a Decade of Manufacturing Enterprise Surveys in Africa? The World Bank Research Observer, 21(2), 241–265. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40282351
Brass, J. N. (2018). Allies or adversaries? NGOs and the state in Africa. Cambridge University Press.
Bratton, M. (1992). Civil Society and Political Transitions in Africa. In J. W. Harbeson et al. (Eds.), Civil Society and the State in Africa (Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 33-50). Boston: Institute for Development Research (IDR) Report.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Partnership for international development: Rhetoric or results? Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Camps, S., & Marques, P. (2014). Exploring how social capital facilitates innovation: The role of innovation enablers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 325-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.008
Chandra, D. R. ., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2022). Governance of inter-organizational systems: a longitudinal case study of Rotterdam’s Port Community System. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 6(2), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm060203
Chrislip, D. D., & Larson, C. E. (1994). Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference. Jossey-Bass.
Cleaver, F. (2001). Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 36-55). Zed Books.
Conditional cash transfers: reducing present and future poverty (English). A World Bank policy research report Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/914561468314712643
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? Zed Books.
Cooperrider, D. L., Sorensen, P. F., Jr., Whitney, D., & Yaeger, T. F. (Eds.). (2000). Appreciative inquiry and organizational transformation: Reports from the field. Stipes Publishing L.L.C.
Cornwall, A., & Coelho, V. S. (Eds.). (2007). Spaces for change? The politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. Zed Books London.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887.
Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Beyond the Magic Bullet: NGO Performance and Accountability in the Post-Cold War World. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., Van Voorhis, F. L., Martin, C. S., Thomas, B. G., Greenfeld, M. D., Hutchins, D. J., & Williams, K. J. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Your action handbook (4th ed.). Corwin Press.
Evans, P. (1996). Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development, 24(6), 1119-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00021-6.
Ferreira, A. E. C. S., Carvalho, C. H., & Gonçalves Neto, W. (2016). Federalism and education in the Republic of Brazil: Dilemmas of educational organization (1889-1930). Acta Scientiarum. Education, 38(2), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascieduc.v38i2.26897
Forsythe, L., Carman, K., Szydlowski, V., Fayish, L., Davidson, L., Hickam, D., & Anyanwu, C. (2019). Patient engagement in research: Early findings from the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Health Affairs, 38(3), 359-367. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067
Fowler, A. F. (2000). Civil society, NGDOs and social development: Changing the rules of the game (Geneva 2000 occasional papers). UN Research Institute for Social Development
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.
Gaventa, J. (2009). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00320.x
Gray, B. (1991). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems (Jossey-Bass Management Series). Jossey-Bass.
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2015). The knowledge capital of nations: Education and the economics of growth (CESifo Book Series). The MIT Press..
Harriss, J. (2007). The Search for Empowerment: Social Capital as Idea and Practice at the World Bank. Development in Practice, 17(1), 162–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520601092113
Hickey, S. (2004). Participation: From tyranny to transformation: Exploring new approaches to participation in development. Zed Books.
Holcomb, J., Ferguson, G., Sun, J., Walton, G., & Highfield, L. (2021). Stakeholder engagement in adoption, implementation, and sustainment of an evidence-based intervention to increase mammography adherence among low-income women. Journal of Cancer Education, 37(5), 1486-1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-01988-2
Houtzager, Peter P.; Gurza Lavalle, Adrián; Acharya, Arnab (2003). Who participates? : civil society and the new democratic politics in São Paulo, Brazil. The Institute of Development Studies and Partner Organisations. Report. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12413/4005
Howard, M., Steensma, H. K., Lyles, M., & Dhanaraj, C. (2016). Learning to collaborate through collaboration: How allying with expert firms influences collaborative innovation within novice firms. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10), 2022-2044. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2424.
Hutchcroft, P. (2000). Obstructive corruption: the politics of privilege in the Philippines, M.H. Khan, K.S. Jomo (Eds.), Rents, Rent-Seeking and Economic Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,207-247.
M.H. Khan, K.S. Jomo (Eds.), Rents, Rent-Seeking and Economic Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000), pp. 207-247Inemek, A., & Matthyssens, P. (2013). The impact of buyer–supplier relationships on supplier innovativeness: An empirical study in cross-border supply networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(4), 580-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.10.011
Jabeen, S., Chandrima, R. M., Hasan, M., Rahman, M. M., Rahman, Q. S., Hossain, A. K. M. T., Dewan, F., Alim, A., Nadia, N., Mahmud, M., Sarker, M. H., Islam, J., Islam, M. S., Ashrafee, S., Haider, M. S., Chisti, M. J., Sheikh, M. Z. H., Miah, M. S., Al-Mahmud, M., Ameen, S., Ahmed, A., Arifeen, S. E., & Rahman, A. E. (2024). A context-driven approach through stakeholder engagement to introduce a digital emergency obstetric and newborn care register into routine obstetric health care services in Bangladesh. Journal of Global Health, 14, Article 04098. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04098
Kharas, H. (2008). The new reality of aid. In L. Brainard & D. Chollet (Eds.), Global development 2.0: Can philanthropists, the public, and the poor make poverty history? Brookings Institution Press.
Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-orientated innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017.
Leftwich, A. (1993). Governance, Democracy and Development in the Third World. Third World Quarterly, 14(3), 605–624. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3992489
Lewis, D. (2001). The management of non-governmental development organizations. Routledge.
Littau, P., Jujagiri, N. J., & Adlbrecht, G. (2010). 25 Years of Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature (1984-2009). Project Management Journal, 41(4), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20195.
Lyulyov, O., Chygryn, O., Pimonenko, T., & Kwiliński, A. (2023). Stakeholders' engagement in the company's management as a driver of green competitiveness within sustainable development. Sustainability, 15(9), Article 7249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097249
Mirzania, P., Ford, A., Andrews, D., Ofori, G., & Maidment, G. (2019). The impact of policy changes: The opportunities of Community Renewable Energy projects in the UK and the barriers they face. Energy Policy, 129, p. 1282–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.066.
Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating development: An ethnography of aid policy and practice. Pluto Press.
Muijs, D., Ainscow, M., Chapman, C., & West, M. (2011). Collaboration and networking in education. Springer.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
OECD. (2016). Development co-operation report 2016: The sustainable development goals as business opportunities. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dcr-2016-en
Okoko, J. M., & Campbell-Chudoba, R. (2025). The role of inter-organizational collaborations and partnerships in leading K-12 education of ethnically and linguistically diverse newcomers. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-01-2025-0001.
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art . The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2010.495581
Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York.
Pilz, M. (2016). India: Preparation for the world of work—Education system and school to work transition. In International handbook of education, development and learning (pp. 717-732). Springer.
Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002
Powell, W. M. (1990). Neither Market nor Hierarchy; Network Forms of Organization. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 295-336). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
Pretty, J.N. (1995) Participatory Learning for Sustainable Agriculture. World Development, 23, 1247-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F
Qvist, M. (2017). Meta-governance and network formation in collaborative spaces of uncertainty: The case of Swedish refugee integration policy. Public Administration, 95(2), 498-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12310
Rahman, A. E., Jabeen, S., Fernandes, G., Banik, G., Islam, J., Ameen, S., Ashrafee, S., Hossain, A. T., Alam, H. M. S., Majid, T., Saberin, A., Ahmed, A., Kabir, A. N. M. E., Chisti, M. J., Ahmed, S., Khan, M., Jackson, T., Dockrell, D. H., Nair, H., Arifeen, S. E., Islam, M. S., & Campbell, H. (2022). Introducing pulse oximetry in routine IMCI services in Bangladesh: A context-driven approach to influence policy and programme through stakeholder engagement. Journal of Global Health, 12, Article 06001. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.06001
Riehl, C. J. (2000). The Principal’s Role in Creating Inclusive Schools for Diverse Students: A Review of Normative, Empirical, and Critical Literature on the Practice of Educational Administration. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 55-81. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070001055
Rippner, J. A. (2014). State P-20 Councils and Collaboration Between K-12 and Higher Education. Educational Policy, 31(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814558008
Rose, P. (2009). NGO provision of basic education: alternative or complementary service delivery to support access to the excluded? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 39(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920902750475
Santibañez, L., Vernez, G., & Razquin, P. (2005). Education in Mexico: Challenges and opportunities (Report No. DB-480-HF). RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB480.html
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
Tendler, J. (1997). Good government in the tropics. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Thoretz, J. (2022). USAID's local capacity strengthening policy [Policy brief]. Humentum. https://www.humentum.org/article/usaids-local-capacity-strengthening-policy
U.S. Agency for International Development. (n.d.). Local capacity strengthening policy: An overview. https://www.usaid.gov/
UNESCO. (2015). Education for all 2000-2015: Achievements and challenges. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education. UNESCO Publishing.
Voets, J., Brandsen, T., Koliba, C., & Verschuere, B. (2021, May 26). Collaborative Governance. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Retrieved 16 Sep. 2025, from https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1419.
Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.