Unlocking Success: Validation of the Motivated Strategies
Article Number: e2026064 | Available Online: May 2026 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2026.23.64
Reginald Govender , Sarah Bansilal
Full text PDF |
399 |
242
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. This study examined the validity of Paul Pintrich’s Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) in a South African online university setting. With the rise of digital education, understanding student motivation in virtual environments has become critical. The research aimed to determine whether the MSLQ’s motivation scales—developed initially in a different context—remain valid and reliable for assessing South African students’ motivational constructs in online learning. Materials/methods. A total of 276 university students participated, completing a 31-item questionnaire on a 7-point Likert scale. The study focused on six latent motivational variables: Intrinsic Goal Orientation, Extrinsic Goal Orientation, Task Value, Control of Learning Beliefs, Self-efficacy for Learning and Performance, and Test Anxiety. Covariance-based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM) was used to assess the construct validity of the MSLQ in this context. Results. The initial model did not fit well. However, after removing latent variables with poor statistical properties, the revised model demonstrated a significant fit. This indicated that a modified version of the MSLQ is valid for use in South African online learning environments. |
Conclusion. The study concluded that a refined MSLQ model is applicable and useful for monitoring student motivation in South African online education. This tool can support course sustainability by helping instructors track and respond to motivational trends across different course offerings.
Keywords: Motivational strategies, Online learning, Pintrich, Structural Equation Modeling
ReferencesAb Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of physics: Conference series, 890(1), 012163. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163
Artino, A. R. (2009). Online learning: Are subjective perceptions of instructional context related to academic success?. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.003
Bansilal, S. (2024). Second-chance Assessments: Social Justice Action or Assessment Disruption In Ramruthan, L, Hoskins, R, Singaram, V. ( Eds.), Assessment through Digital Platforms within Higher Education Studies, (pp 106–128) https://doi.org/10.29086/978-0-9869937-2-5/2022/AASBS12/7
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), https://doi.org/588-606. 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological methods & research, 16(1), 78–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The internet and higher education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit: Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 136–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
Boomsma, A. (1982). The robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction, 149–173.
Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, Improper Solutions, and Starting Values in LISREL Maximum Likelihood Estimation. Psychometrika, 50(2), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294248
Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). University students' online academic help seeking: The role of self-regulation and information commitments. The Internet and Higher Education, 16(1), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.02.002
Comas-Forgas, R., Lancaster, T., Calvo-Sastre, A., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2021). Exam Cheating and Academic Integrity Breaches during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Internet Search Activity in Spain. Heliyon e08233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08233
Credé, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and individual differences, 21(4), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002
Cutri, R. M., Mena, J., & Whiting, E. F. (2020). Faculty readiness for online crisis teaching: transitioning to online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1815702
Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(1), 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
Department of Higher Education and Training. DHET. (2024). Fact Sheet: Highest Level of Educational Attainment in South Africa. DHET. https://www.dhet.gov.za/Planning%20Monitoring%20and%20Evaluation%20Coordination/Fact%20Sheet%20-High%20Level%20Education%20Attainment%20in%20South%20Africa-%20April%20%202024.pdf
Duncan, T., Pintrich, P., Smith, D., & McKeachie, W. (2015). Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) manual. National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, 2(2547.6968), https://doi.org/10.13140/RG
Dunn, K. E., Lo, W. J., Mulvenon, S. W., & Sutcliffe, R. (2012). Revisiting the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire: A theoretical and statistical reevaluation of the metacognitive self-regulation and effort regulation subscales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(2), 312-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411413461
Elshareif, E., & Mohamed, E. (2021). The effects of e-learning on students’ motivation to learn in higher education. Online Learning, 25(3), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i3.2336
Fan, Y., Chen, J., Shirkey, G., John, R., Wu, S. R., Park, H., & Shao, C. (2016). Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review. Ecological Processes, 5(19), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-016-0063-3
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gallagher, M. W., & Brown, T. A. (2013). Introduction to confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. In Handbook of quantitative methods for educational research (pp. 287–314). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-404-8_14
García, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Assessing Students' Motivation and Learning Strategies: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0657-3_12
Garg, M., & Goel, A. (2022). A systematic literature review on online assessment security: Current challenges and integrity strategies. Computers & Security, 113(C), 102544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102544
Goodsett, M. (2020). Best practices for teaching and assessing critical thinking in information literacy online learning objects. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), https://doi.org/102163. 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102163
Govender, R. (2023). Teaching and learning using virtual labs: Investigating the effects on students’ self-regulation, Cogent Education, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172308
Govender, R. G., & Khoza, S. B. (2022). First-hand user experience: Can Kaltura video come to the rescue of Moodle during/post COVID-19?. African Identities, 11(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2022.2082376
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Cengage Learning. Hampshire, United Kingdom, 633.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis (8 ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS- SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research. 109(5-6), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017a). Mirror, mirror on the wall, A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 616-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x
Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
Hartnett, M., & Hartnett, M. (2016). What Do the Case Studies Tell Us About Motivation?. Motivation in online education, Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2_4
Hassan, M. M., Mirza, T., & Hussain, M. W. (2020). A critical review by teachers on the online teaching-learning during the COVID-19. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 10(5), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2020.05.03
Hathaway, D. M., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Korona, M. (2024). Teachers’ online preparedness in times of crises: Trends from Norway and US. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1489-1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11733-5
Hayes, A. F., Montoya, A. K., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modeling. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25(1), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.02.001
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008, September). Evaluating model fit: a synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In 7th European Conference on research methodology for business and management studies (Vol. 2008, pp. 195-200). https://doi.org/10.21427/D79B73
Huang, S. C. (2008). Assessing motivation and learning strategies using the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire in a foreign language learning context. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 36(4), 529-534. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2008.36.4.529
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal, 20(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jackson, C. R. (2018). Validating and adapting the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) for STEM courses at an HBCU. Aera Open, 4(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418809346
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychological methods, 14(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694
J¨oreskog, K. G., & S¨orbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL, US.
Kilag, O. K. T., Del Socorro, A. S., Largo, J. L., Peras, C. C., Book, J. F. P., & Abendan, C. F. K. (2023). Perspectives and experiences in online teaching and learning. Science and Education, 4(6), 561-571. https://openscience.uz/index.php/sciedu/article/view/6031
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & education, 104, 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
Kulikowski, K., Przytuła, S., Sułkowski, Ł., & Rašticová, M. (2022). Technostress of students during COVID-19-a sign of the time?. Human Technology, 18(3), 234-249. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2022.18-3.3
Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople's commitment and performance. Journal of business research, 65(9), 1328-1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.026
Mabasa, D. G. (2024). E-Learning Supporting Infrastructure Investment in South Africa: Perspective of a Developing Economy. In European Conference on e-Learning (pp. 235-241). Academic Conferences International Limited. Portgual. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.23.1.2758
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
Malholtra, N. (2010). Review of Marketing Research, Vol. 7. RMR, Singapore.
McClintic-Gilbert, M. S., Corpus, J. H., Wormington, S. V., & Haimovitz, K. (2013). The Relationships among Middle School Students' Motivational Orientations, Learning Strategies, and Academic Achievement. The Middle Grades Research Journal, 8, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/mgrj-02-2013-0003
McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., & Lin, Y. G. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. The University of Michigan.
Mohamad, M., Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., & Mohammad, M. (2019). Comparison between CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Testing and confirming the maqasid syariah quality of life measurement model. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(3), 608-614. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.53.608.614
Mollenkopf, D., Gaskill, M., Nelson, R. M., & Diaz, C. C. (2020). Navigating a “new normal” during the COVID-19 pandemic: college student perspectives of the shift to remote learning. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 17(2), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2020-v17n2-08
Nilsen, E. B., Bowler, D. E., & Linnell, J. D. (2020). Exploratory and confirmatory research in the open science era. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57(4), 842-847. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13571
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292. Nyhan, RC, and HA Marlowe. (1997). Development And Psychometric Properties of The Organizational Trust Inventory. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 614-635.
Orçan, F. (2018). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: which one to use first?. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 9(4), 414-421. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.394323
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational psychology review, 16(4), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1994). Self-regulated learning in college students: Knowledge, strategies, and motivation. Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie, 113-133. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203052754
Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 167–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective, 731-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0245-5_2
Putwain, D. W., Woods, K. A., & Symes, W. (2010). Personal and situational predictors of test anxiety of students in post-compulsory education. The British journal of educational psychology, 80(Pt 1), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X466082
Rad, H. S. (2021). Effect of PCaRD DGB Flipped Learning on EFL Learners' Grammar Skill. Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(2), 544. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.2.10.544
Rao, N., & Sachs, J. (1999). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Chinese version of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational and psychological measurement, 59(6), 1016-1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131649921970206
Raunig, D. L., Pennello, G. A., Delfino, J. G., Buckler, A. J., Hall, T. J., Guimaraes, A. R., ... & Obuchowski, N. (2023). Multiparametric quantitative imaging biomarker as a multivariate descriptor of health: a roadmap. Academic radiology, 30(2), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.10.026
Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On comparing results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five perspectives and five recommendations. Marketing: ZFP–Journal of Research and Management, 39(3), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-4
Roy, G., Dutta, S., Tanni, S. A., & Rahman, A. (2023). Student motivation in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case of Bangladesh. In Handbook of research on redesigning teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital era (pp. 57-86). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8292-6.ch004
Sabi, S. C., Kolanisi, U., Siwela, M., & Naidoo, D. (2020). Students’ vulnerability and perceptions of food insecurity at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. South African journal of clinical nutrition, 33(4), 144-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/16070658.2019.1600249
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it?. Journal of research in innovative teaching & learning, 10(1), 4-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Profiling teachers' readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who's ready?. Computers in human behavior, 118 (2021), 106675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
Shi, D., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2020). The effect of estimation methods on SEM fit indices. Educational and psychological measurement, 80(3), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419885164
Skinner, E. A. (2016). Engagement and disaffection as central to processes of motivational resilience and development. In Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 145-168). Routledge.
Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British journal of educational technology, 43(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
Tabak, F., & Nguyen, N. T. (2013). Technology acceptance and performance in online learning environments: Impact of self-regulation. Technology, 9(1), 116-130.
Truong, Y., & McColl, R. (2011). Intrinsic motivations, self-esteem, and luxury goods consumption. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 18(6), 555-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.08.004
Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop202023
Widaman, K. F., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychological methods, 8(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.8.1.16
Wieland, N., & Kollias, L. (2020). Online learning before, during and after COVID-19: Observations over 20 years. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 13(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v13i2.16779
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and psychological measurement, 76(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
Wong, R. (2023). When no one can go to school: does online learning meet students’ basic learning needs?. Interactive learning environments, 31(1), 434-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789672
Xie, X., Siau, K., & Nah, F. F. H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic–online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of information technology case and application research, 22(3), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2020.1824884
Yousefi, M., & Rezaei, S. (2022). The mediating role of motivated strategies in the relationship between formative classroom assessment and academic well-being in medical students: a path analysis. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03118-y
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American educational research journal, 45(1), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909