Technological Advancements and Their Influence on Academic Performance
Article Number: e2026007 | Available Online: January 2026 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2026.20.7
Salsabeel F. M. Alfalah , Tasneem Alfalah
Full text PDF |
2850 |
1063
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. Traditional online learning platforms exhibit limitations relative to face-to-face education, as students tend to prefer and achieve superior performance outcomes in conventional classroom environments. This study aimed to examine comparative experiences across various learning modalities and to identify opportunities to improve virtual education platforms, specifically through the incorporation of Augmented Reality (AR) technology as a transformative educational tool. Materials/methods. The study employed a comprehensive review of contemporary literature examining various learning modes (face-to-face, online, and immersive virtual learning) and analyzed instances of AR integration in educational settings to assess their impact on teaching and learning outcomes. Results. The results indicated a distinct preference for in-person learning and improved performance outcomes compared to online platforms. The study identified several effective instances of augmented reality (AR) integration in educational settings, demonstrating positive effects on learning experiences and underscoring AR's potential to enhance educational outcomes in virtual learning environments. |
Conclusion. Face-to-face learning offers clear advantages over existing online platforms; however, augmented reality technology holds substantial potential to create impactful, engaging virtual learning experiences that can effectively rival traditional educational methods. The strategic implementation of augmented reality in virtual education can significantly enhance student engagement and academic achievement.
Keywords: Learning, Education, Classroom, VR/AR, Traditional
ReferencesAdams, J. C., & Hotrop, J. (2008). Building an economical vr system for cs education. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(3), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/1597849.1384312
AlFarsi, G., Tawafak, R. M., ElDow, A., Malik, S. I., Jabbar, J., & Al Sideiri, A. (2021). Smart classroom technology in artificial intelligence: A review paper. International Conference on Culture Heritage, Education, Sustainable Tourism, and Innovation Technologies (CESIT2020), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010306502290235
Baum, L. F. (1901). The master key: An electrical fairy tale, founded upon the mysteries of electricity and the optimism of its devotees. Indianapolis, IN: Bowen-Merrill Co.
Ben-Ari, M., & Mondada, F. (2018). Robots and their applications. In Elements of robotics (pp. 1–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62533-1_1
Berg, L. P., & Vance, J. M. (2017). Industry use of virtual reality in product design and manufacturing: a survey. Virtual Reality, 21, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0293-9
Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A survey of augmented reality. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 8(2–3), 73–272. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000049
Bourguet, M.-L., Carral, S., Iles, A., & Uotila, E. (2020). Social robots that can sense and improve student engagement. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 112–119). IEEE.
Bown, J., White, E., & Boopalan, A. (2017). Boundaries of self and reality online. In Boundaries of self and reality online (pp. 239–259). Elsevier.
Brady, M., Gerhardt, L. A., & Davidson, H. F. (2012). Robotics and artificial intelligence (Vol. 11). Springer Science & Business Media.
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988510
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28–47.
Chocarro, R., Cortiñas, M., & Marcos-Matás, G. (2021). Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics. Educational Studies, 1–19.
Chowdhury, S., Nath, S., Dey, A., & Das, A. (2020). Student attendance system in crowded classrooms using a smartphone camera. 2020 Emerging Technology in Computing, Communication and Electronics (ETCCE), 1–5.
Colace, F., De Santo, M., Lombardi, M., Pascale, F., Pietrosanto, A., & Lemma, S. (2018). Chatbot for e-learning: A case of study. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 7(5), 528–533. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijmerr.7.5.528-533
Dimitriadou, E., & Lanitis, A. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in smart classes: A survey. 2022 IEEE 21st Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), 642–647. https://doi.org/10.1109/melecon53508.2022.9843020
Dincelli, E., & Yayla, A. (2022). Immersive virtual reality in the age of the metaverse: A hybrid-narrative review based on the technology affordance perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 31(2), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2022.101717
Dryjanski, M., Buczkowski, M., Ould-Cheikh-Mouhamedou, Y., & Kliks, A. (2020). Adoption of smart cities with a practical smart building implementation. IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, 3(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/iotm.0001.1900050
Fertleman, C., Aubugeau-Williams, P., Sher, C., Lim, A. N., Lumley, S., Delacroix, S., & Pan, X. (2018). A discussion of virtual reality as a new tool for training healthcare professionals. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 44. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00044
Górski, F., Buń, P., Wichniarek, R., Zawadzki, P., & Hamrol, A. (2016). Effective design of educational virtual reality applications for medicine using knowledge-engineering techniques. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00623a
Gupta, S. K., Ashwin, T., & Guddeti, R. M. R. (2018). Cvucams: Computer vision based unobtrusive classroom attendance management system. 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 101–102.
Hampel, G., & Dancsházy, K. (2014). Creating a virtual learning environment. Agrárinformatika/Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 5(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.17700/jai.2014.5.1.124
Han, J., & Kim, D. (2009). r-Learning services for elementary school students with a teaching assistant robot. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’09) (pp. 255–256). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1145/1514095.1514163
Hashimoto, T., Kato, N., & Kobayashi, H. (2011). Development of educational system with the android robot saya and evaluation. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 8(3), 28. https://doi.org/10.5772/10667
Huang, L.-S., Su, J.-Y., & Pao, T.-L. (2019). A context aware smart classroom architecture for smart campuses. Applied Sciences, 9(9), 1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091837
Ishiguro, H., Ono, T., Imai, M., Maeda, T., Kanda, T., & Nakatsu, R. (2001). Robovie: an interactive humanoid robot. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 28(6), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/01439910110410051
Johal, W., Castellano, G., Tanaka, F., & Okita, S. (2018). Robots for learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Companion (HRI Companion) (pp. 1–2).
Jones, A., & Castellano, G. (2018). Adaptive robotic tutors that support self-regulated learning: A longer-term investigation with primary school children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0458-z
Karri, S. P. R., & Kumar, B. S. (2020). Rule-based chabot for student enquiries. 2020 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), 1–5.
Kasapakis, V., Gavalas, D., & Dzardanova, E. (2019). Mixed reality. In Handbook of Research on Cross-Cultural Business Education (pp. 278–300). IGI Global.
Kennedy, J., Baxter, P., & Belpaeme, T. (2015). Comparing robot embodiments in a guided discovery learning interaction with children. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0277-4
Kinshuk, Chen, N.-S., Cheng, I.-L., & Chew, S. W. (2016). Evolution is not enough: Revolutionizing current learning environments to smart learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0108-x
Knudsen, C., & Naeve, A. (2002). Presence production in a distributed shared virtual environment for exploring mathematics. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advanced Computer Systems (pp. 1–8). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8530-9_13
Kollia, I., & Siolas, G. (2016). Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) (pp. 1–6).
Kong, Y., & Fu, Y. (2022). Human action recognition and prediction: A survey. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(5), 1366–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-022-01594-9
Krasonikolakis, I., Vrechopoulos, A., Pouloudi, A., & Dimitriadis, S. (2018). Store layout effects on consumer behavior in 3d online stores. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-03-2015-0183
Kye, B., Han, N., Kim, E., Park, Y., & Jo, S. (2021). Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32
Lee, H., Jung, T. H., tom Dieck, M. C., & Chung, N. (2020). Experiencing immersive virtual reality in museums. Information & Management, 57(5), 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103229
Li, X., Wang, M., Zeng, W., & Lu, W. (2019). A students’ action recognition database in smart classroom. 2019 14th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 523–527. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccse.2019.8845330
Loos, R. (2015). Cowriter: Children using robots to learn writing. In Robotics today (pp. 101–110). Springer.
Manouchou, E., Stavroulia, K. E., Ruiz-Harisiou, A., Georgiou, K., Sella, F., & Lanitis, A. (2016). A feasibility study on using virtual reality for understanding deficiencies of high school students. 2016 18th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/melcon.2016.7495418
Marini, A., Nafisah, S., Sekaringtyas, T., Safitri, D., Lestari, I., Suntari, Y., Sudrajat, A., & Iskandar, R. (2022). Mobile augmented-reality learning media with the metaverse to improve student learning outcomes in science classes. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(7), 45–58.
Mery, D., Mackenney, I., & Villalobos, E. (2019). Student attendance system in crowded classrooms using a smartphone camera. 2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 857–866. https://doi.org/10.1109/wacv.2019.00096
Mintz, R., Litvak, S., & Yair, Y. (2001). 3d-virtual reality in science education: An implication for astronomy teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching.
Mircea, M., Stoica, M., & Ghilic-Micu, B. (2021). Investigating the impact of the internet of things in higher education environment. IEEE Access, 9, 33396–33409. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3060964
Morrissey, K., & Kirakowski, J. (2013). Social robots that can sense and improve student engagement. Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Modalities and Techniques: 15th International Conference, HCI International 2013, 87–96.
Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., & Dong, J. J. (2013). A review of the applicability of robots in education. Journal of Technology in Education and Learning, 1(209–0015), 13. https://doi.org/10.2316/journal.209.2013.1.209-0015
Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2(1), 486–497.
Okita, S. Y., Ng-Thow-Hing, V., & Sarvadevabhatla, R. (2009). RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 1125–1130.
Osada, J., Ohnaka, S., & Sato, M. (2006). The scenario and design process of childcare robot, PaPeRo. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (pp. 1–8). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1178823.1178917
Pakanati, D., Thanner, G., & Reddy, R. R. (2020). Design of college chatbot using Amazon Web Services. International Journal of Scientific Research & Engineering Trends, 6(6), 3343–3346.Palanisamy, P., Paavizhi, K., & Saravanakumar, A. (2020). Techno pedagogical skills for teaching-learning process in smart class. Talent Development & Excellence, 12(1), 4984–4994.
Parambil, M. M. A., Ali, L., Alnajjar, F., & Gochoo, M. (2022). Smart classroom: A deep learning approach towards attention assessment through class behavior detection. 2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/aset53988.2022.9735018
Parmar, D., Isaac, J., Babu, S. V., D’Souza, N., Leonard, A. E., Jörg, S., Gundersen, K., & Daily, S. B. (2016). Emotional experiences of users in virtual reality environments: A study of educational applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) (pp. 131–140).
Pereira, J. (2016). Leveraging chatbots to improve self-guided learning through conversational quizzes. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 911–918. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012430.3012625
Poppinga, B., & Laue, T. (2019). RoboCup 2019: Robot World Cup XXIII. In RoboCup 2019: Robot World Cup XXIII (pp. 227–240). Springer.
Rashmi, M., Ashwin, T., & Guddeti, R. M. R. (2021). Surveillance video analysis for student action recognition and localization inside computer laboratories of a smart campus. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80, 2907–2929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09741-5
Sadiku, M. N., Musa, S. M., & Chukwu, U. C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.
Saini, M. K., & Goel, N. (2019). How smart are smart classrooms? a review of smart classroom technologies. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52(6), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365757
Sejnowski, T. J. (2020). The unreasonable effectiveness of deep learning in artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(48), 30033–30038. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907373117
Shahab, M. H., Ghazali, E., & Mohtar, M. (2021). The role of elaboration likelihood model in consumer behaviour research and its extension to new technologies: A review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 664–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12658
Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Howley, I., Hayashi, K., & Hagita, N. (2015). Can a social robot stimulate science curiosity in classrooms? International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0303-1
Singh, J., Joesph, M. H., & Jabbar, K. B. A. (2019). Rule-based chabot for student enquiries. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1228(1), 12060. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1228/1/012060
T. S, A., & Guddeti, R. M. R. (2020). Automatic detection of students’ affective states in classroom environment using hybrid convolutional neural networks. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1387–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10004-6
ten Have, H., & Patrão Neves, M. d. C. (2021). Dictionary of Global Bioethics (p. 461). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54161-3
Tian, X., Risha, Z., Ahmed, I., Narayanan, A. B. L., & Biehl, J. (2021). Let’s talk it out: A chatbot for effective study habit behavioral change. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1–32.
Timms, M. J. (2016). Letting artificial intelligence in education out of the box: educational cobots and smart classrooms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0095-y
Torres, D. R., García, A., & López, M. (2011). Realidad aumentada, educación y museos. Revista ICONO14. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías Emergentes, 9(2), 212–226.
Vega, J., & Cañas, J. M. (2019). Open vision system for low-cost robotics education. Electronics, 8(11), 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8111295
Wang, R., Zhang, G., Zhang, F., Dong, Z., & Qi, M. (2021). Advances in intelligent information hiding and multimedia signal processing: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on IIHMSP in conjunction with the 13th International Conference on FITAT (pp. 496–504). Springer.
Weibel, M., Nielsen, M. K. F., Topperzer, M. K., Hammer, N. M., Møller, S. W., Schmiegelow, K., & Bækgaard Larsen, H. (2020). Back to school with telepresence robot technology: A qualitative pilot study about how telepresence robots help school-aged children and adolescents with cancer to remain socially and academically connected with their school classes during treatment. Nursing Open, 7(4), 988–997. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.471
Werner-Seidler, A., Perry, Y., Calear, A. L., Newby, J. M., & Christensen, H. (2017). School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs for young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 51, 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.005
West, D. M. (2018). The future of work: Robots, AI, and automation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Woo, H., LeTendre, G. K., Pham-Shouse, T., & Xiong, Y. (2021). The use of social robots in classrooms: A review of field-based studies. Educational Research Review, 33, 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100388
Wu, X., Yang, Y., Yu, X., & Zheng, C. (2021). Big data analytics for cyber-physical system in smart city: BDCPS 2020, 28–29 December 2020, Shanghai, China. Springer.
Yaoyuneyong, G. S., Pollitte, W. A., Foster, J. K., & Flynn, L. R. (2018). Virtual dressing room media, buying intention and mediation. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrim-06-2017-0042