Mind the Gap: A Comparative Study of Faculty and Student Readiness for AI-Integrated ELT in Azerbaijani Higher Education
Article Number: e2025594 | Available Online: December 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.19.594
Hasan Alisoy , Dana Amirbayeva , Zarifa Sadigzade , Yasin Babazade
Full text PDF |
465 |
263
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. Azerbaijani higher education is undergoing a rapid digital transformation in response to global advances in artificial intelligence (AI). Within this context, English language teaching (ELT) faces the challenge of integrating AI tools to enhance learning outcomes. However, little is known about how prepared educators and learners are for this shift. This study compares ELT faculty and student readiness for AI-integrated teaching and learning at a public Azerbaijani university, identifying gaps and capacity-building needs. Materials/methods. A convergent mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitatively, a survey measured technological and mindset readiness among 150 bachelor-level ELT students and 16 ELT faculty members. Qualitatively, two focus group interviews explored perceptions, perceived benefits, and concerns regarding AI in education. Results. Survey findings indicate that students reported higher technology familiarity and more positive attitudes toward AI compared to faculty, who demonstrated cautious optimism but lower self-assessed AI skills. Focus groups revealed that both groups recognised potential benefits, such as personalised learning support, while also expressing concerns about ethical use, data privacy, and insufficient training opportunities. |
Conclusion. A readiness gap exists: students appear more comfortable adopting AI, whereas faculty require targeted support to integrate AI pedagogically. To bridge this gap, institutions should prioritise professional development, establish clear guidelines, and implement supportive policies for AI adoption in ELT.
Keywords: AI integration; English language teaching; technology readiness; digital literacy; Azerbaijan
ReferencesAlghamdy, R. Z. (2023). Pedagogical and ethical implications of artificial intelligence in EFL contexts: A review study. English Language Teaching, 16(10), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n10p87
Alharbi, W. (2025). Between documentation and pedagogy: ESL/EFL teacher burnout and perceptions of AI’s potential for workload relief. Educational Process: International Journal, 17, e2025309. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.309
Alisoy, H., Mammadova, I., Asadova, B., Ismayilli, F., & Aliyeva, T. (2024). The future of language education: Integrating smartphones into the curriculum. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 4539–4556. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2986
Aljabr, F., & Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H. (2024). Ethical and pedagogical implications of AI in language education: An empirical study at Ha’il University [Preprint]. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4952416
Babayeva, U. (2023). Azerbaijan education technology profile. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. https://education-profiles.org/northern-africa-and-western-asia/azerbaijan/~technology
Coffey, L. (2024, August 12). A new digital divide: Student AI use surges, leaving faculty behind. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Kallogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., Gözüm, A. I. Ç., & İpek, Z. H. (2023). Educational applications of the ChatGPT AI system: A systematic review. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(3), 26–55. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.12.3.2
Kim, S. (2023). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ learning in EFL. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00214-7
Neff, J. D., Arciaga, K., & Burri, M. (2024). EFL students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the ethical uses of AI tools. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 6(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n3.1714
Nguyen, T. T., Pham, H. Q., & Do, T. N. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in language learning: Perceptions of English-majored students in Vietnam. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11614-2
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
World Bank. (2024). Institutional development and technology integration for increased research and quality higher education in Azerbaijan (Report No. 194758). World Bank Group. [http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099111424113038319](http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099111424113038319)
World Bank. (2024). Institutional development and technology integration for increased research and quality higher education in Azerbaijan (Report No. 194758). World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099111424113038319