Creative Thinking Process of Prospective Mathematics Teacher Students in Solving Numerical Problems
Article Number: e2025590 | Available Online: December 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.19.590
Lukmanul Akhsani , Kartono , Iwan Junaedi , Tri Sri Noor Asih
Full text PDF |
471 |
252
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. Creative thinking is an essential 21st-century skill in mathematics education, closely connected to logical-mathematical ability. Solving numerical problems requires students to think systematically, flexibly, and deeply beyond technical skills. In this context, the creative thinking process remains underexplored empirically. Therefore, this research aims to describe and visualize the stages of students’ creative thinking in solving numerical problems. Materials/methods. This research used a quantitative-descriptive and qualitative phenomenological method to investigate the creative thinking process. Category development was achieved through a combined concept-driven and data-driven process. The subjects were students in the Mathematics Education Research Program at Muhammadiyah University of Purwokerto, Indonesia. Students selected had taken courses relevant to numerical problems, namely the methods course. Results. Students’ creative thinking process in solving numerical problems reflected an integration of logical-mathematical intelligence skills across all stages from preparation in understanding the problem, incubation in planning, to illumination in generating strategic ideas. In the formulation and verification stages, students exhibited systematic thinking. However, limited alternative exploration and critical evaluation reduced the overall solution efficiency. These results emphasized the importance of instructional methods that promoted cognitive flexibility and metacognitive reflection throughout each stage of the creative thinking process. |
Conclusion. The development of students’ creative thinking in solving numerical problems required strong logical-mathematical intelligence, alternative solution exploration, and intensive metacognitive training. The results showed that curriculum design could balance theoretical and practical aspects to enhance cognitive flexibility, strengthen conceptual mastery, and support the formulation of creative numerical solutions.
Keywords: Creative thinking, logical-mathematical ability, numerical methods, problem-solving
ReferencesAbraham, A., Thybusch, K., Pieritz, K., & Hermann, C. (2014). Gender Differences in Creative Thinking: Behavioral and fMRI Findings. Brain Imaging and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-013-9241-4
Akcanca, N., & Ozsevgec, L. C. (2018). Effect of Activities Prepared by Different Teaching Techniques on Scientific Creativity Levels of Prospective Pre-School Teachers. European Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.1.71
Akhsani, Lukmanul, Kartono K., Junaedi, I., & Asih, T. S. N. (2022). The Creative Thinking Process of Mathematics Education Students Based on the Wallas Thinking Stage in Terms of Student Learning Barriers. ISET: International Conference on Science, Education and Technology, 15–22.
Alchihabi, A., Ekmekci, O., Kivilcim, B. B., Newman, S. D., & Vural, F. T. Y. (2018). On the Brain Networks of Complex Problem Solving. Arxiv. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.05077
Arum, D. P., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Pramudya, I. (2018). Students’ logical-mathematical intelligence profile. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1008(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012071
Azinar, J. A., Munzir, S., & Bahrun. (2020). Students’ logical-mathematical intelligence through the problem-solving approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012024
Beaty, R. E., & Kenett, Y. N. (2020). Mapping the Creative Mind. American Scientist.
Bian, Q., Ling, X., & Yan, S. (2024). Bridging the Algorithmic Divide: Refocusing Faculty Artificial Intelligence Literacy in Higher Education. Education as Change 28. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/17983.
Bicer, A. (2024). Mathematical Creativity in Upper Elementary School Mathematics Curricula. Thinking Skills and Creativity 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101462.
Çetinkaya, Ç. (2014). The Effect of Gifted Students’ Creative Problem Solving Program on Creative Thinking. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.830
Chang, T.-T., Lung, T.-C., Ng, C.-T., & Metcalfe, A. W. S. (2019). Fronto-insular-parietal network engagement underlying arithmetic word problem solving. Human Brain Mapping, 40, 1927–1941. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24502
Chen, H. (2024). Interpretation and Translation: How an Education Policy Is Distorted and Reoriented by Official Education Systems. Education as Change 28. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/16127.
Karakaya Cirit, D., & Aydemir, S. (2023). Online Scratch Activities during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Computational and Creative Thinking. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education 12 (4): 2111–20. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.24938.
Daiana, P., Surahmat, S., & Fathani, A. H. (2021). Profile of Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability in Solving Mathematical Problem. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v11i1.7810
Dubinka, M. (2014). The Problem of Development of the Creative Personality during the University Studying. dspace.cuspu.edu.ua.
Fatmawati, A., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Sutopo. (2019). Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Learning Achievement: How They Are Related. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012070/meta
García, T. (2016). Elementary Students’ Metacognitive Processes and Post-Performance Calibration on Mathematical Problem-Solving Tasks. Metacognition and Learning 11 (2): 139–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9139-1.
Greenwood, N., & Gibson, R. (2020). Creativity and the Unconscious in the Screenwriting Classroom: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Screenwriting. https://doi.org/10.1386/josc_00022_1
Guilford, J. (2017). Creativity: A Quarter Century of Progress. Perspectives in Creativity. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315126265-2.
Gunawan, G., Ferdianto, F., Mulyatna, F., & Untarti, R. (2025). The Profile of Creative Thinking Process: Prospective Mathematics Teachers. Jurnal Eduscience 12(2), 450–464. https://jurnal.ulb.ac.id/index.php/eduscience/article/view/6915.
Hadi, T. S., Waluya, S. B., & Suyitno, A. (2025). The Quantum Learning Model’s View of Mathematical Logical Intelligence from the Point of View of Creativity in Mathematics Learning. ASM Science Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1862
Helie, S. (2013). Towards a unified neurobiological theory of creative problem solving. The 2013 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2013.6706934.
Huang, P.-S., Peng, S.-L., Chen, H.-C., Tseng, L.-C., & Hsu, L.-C. (2017). The Relative Influences of Domain Knowledge and Domain-General Divergent Thinking on Scientific Creativity and Mathematical Creativity. … Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.001
Bal İncebacak, B., & Ersoy, E. (2018). Creative Problem Solving Skills Of Secondary School Students. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Belgin-Bal-Incebacak/publication/326091155_Ortaokul_Ogrencilerinin_Yaratici_Problem_Cozme_Becerileri/links/5b4eea9ea6fdcc8dae28109a/Ortaokul-Oegrencilerinin-Yaratici-Problem-Coezme-Becerileri.pdf
Kachelmeier, S. J., Wang, L. W., & Williamson, M. G. (2019). Incentivizing the Creative Process: From Initial Quantity to Eventual Creativity. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52196.
Kim, J. (2023). How Does an Inquiry-Based Instructional Approach Predict the STEM Creative Productivity of Specialized Science High School Students? Education Sciences 13 (8). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080773.
Kirana, I. O., Nasution, Z. M., Anggraini, F., & Damanik, B. E. (2023). The Numerical Ability on Student Achievement of STIKOM Tunas Bangsa. At-Tarbawi: Journal of Education, Social, and Culture. https://journal.iainlangsa.ac.id/index.php/tarbawi/article/view/6311
Konecni, V. J. (2012). Composers’ Creative Process: The Role of Life-Events, Emotion, and Reason. Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Creativity Performance, And Perception. New York: books.google.com.
Kuckartz, U. (2019). Qualitative Text Analysis: A Systematic Approach. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_8.
El Koshiry, A., & Tony, M. A. A. (2025). Modern Learning Strategies in the Age of Digital Transformation: Future Insights and Practical Challenges. Educational Process: International Journal 17. https://doi.org/10.22521%2fedupij.2025.17.313
Luchini, S. A., Zhang, X., White, R. T., Lührs, M., Ramot, M., & Beaty, R. E. (2025). Enhancing creativity with covert neurofeedback: causal evidence for default-executive network coupling in creative thinking. Cerebral Cortex, 35(4), bhaf065. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf065
Liu, Zuo Yuan, Alena Vobolevich, & Alexey Oparin. (2023). The Influence of AI ChatGPT on Improving Teachers’ Creative Thinking. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 22(12): 124–39. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.12.7.
Maharani, H. R., Sukestiyarno, S., & Waluya, B. (2017). Creative Thinking Process Based on Wallas Model in Solving Mathematics Problem. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i2.5783
Malafouris, L. (2014). Creative Thinging: The Feeling of and for Clay. Pragmatics & Cognition.
Matheson, H. E., Kenett, Y. N., Gerver, C., & Beaty, R. E. (2023). Representing creative thought: A representational similarity analysis of creative idea generation and evaluation. Neuropsychologia, 187, 108587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108587
Meng, Na, & Hsuan Po Wang. (2024). Influence of Young Teachers’ Perceived School Support on Creative Teaching Behaviors in Higher Vocational Colleges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 23 (11): 344–64. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.11.18.
Mumford, Michael D., & Tristan McIntosh. (2017). Creative Thinking Processes: The Past and the Future. Journal of Creative Behavior 51 (4): 317–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.197
Mumford, Michael D., Michele I. Mobley, Roni Reiter-Palmon, Charles E. Uhlman, & Lesli M. Doares. (1991). Process Analytic Models of Creative Capacities. Creativity Research Journal 4 (2): 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534380.
Munir, R. (2016). Metode Numerik. Bandung: Informatika.
Okere, M. I., & Ndeke, G. C. (2012). Influence of Gender and Knowledge on Secondary School Students’ Scientific Creativity Skills in Nakuru District, Kenya. European Journal of Educational Research.
Park, H. R. P., Kirk, I. J., & Waldie, K. E. (2015). Neural Correlates of Creative Thinking and Schizotypy. Neuropsychologia.Pavlović, J, and S Maksić. 2019. Implicit Theories of Creativity in Higher Education: A Constructivist Study. Journal of Constructivist Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.007
Pham, H., & Cho, S. (2018). Nurturing Mathematical Creativity in Schools. Turkish Journal of Giftedness & Education.
Piaw, C. Y. (2014). Effects of Gender and Thinking Style on Student’s Creative Thinking Ability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1087
Prastika, V. Y. A., Riyadi, & Siswanto. (2021). Analysis of mathematical creative thinking level based on logical mathematical intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), 12011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012011
Puryear, J. S. (2016). Inside the Creative Sifter: Recognizing Metacognition in Creativity Development. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.80
Ratnaningsih, N. (2021). Mathematical Creative Thinking Process of the Students: An Analysis of Wallas Stages and Personality Types. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012111
Ritter, S. M., van Baaren, R. B., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012). Creativity: The Role of Unconscious Processes in Idea Generation and Idea Selection. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.12.002
Romdon, I. S., & Puspsowati, A. K. (2019). The Role of Cognitive Stage toward Students Mathematical Creative Thinking and Habits of Mind. (JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v1i4.p374-382
Runco, M. A., & Alabbasi, A. M. A. (2024). Interactions among Dimensions of Divergent Thinking as Predictors of Creative Activity and Accomplishment. Thinking Skills and Creativity 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101583.
Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2012). Creativity and Development. Creativity and Development. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195149005.001.0001.
Sawyer, R. K. (2021). The Surprising Path of Creativity. Journal of Creativity, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100002.
Saragih, T. K. (2019). The Influence of Students' Learning Motivation and Numerical Intelligence on Mathematics Learning Achievement. SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan), 3(3), 258–263. https://doi.org/10.30998/sap.v3i3.3600
Setiawani, S., Fatahillah, A., Dafik, Oktavianingtyas, E., & Wardani, D. Y. (2019). The Students’ Creative Thinking Process in Solving Mathematics Problem Based on Wallas’ Stages. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 243 (1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012052.
Shen, X., Zhou, H., Wang, F., Long, Z., Zhou, J., Li, C., Qin, Y., Li, K., & Zhong, N. (2013). Neural Mechanism of Mental Imagery in Problem Solving. In K. Imamura, S. Usui, T. Shirao, T. Kasamatsu, L. Schwabe, & N. Zhong (Eds.), Brain and Health Informatics (pp. 62–71). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02753-1_7
Simonton, D. K. (2018). Creative Ideas and the Creative Process: Good News and Bad News for the Neuroscience of Creativity. The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity. Cambridge University Press New. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556238.002
Sitar, A. S., Černe, M., Aleksić, D., & Mihelič, K. K. (2016). Individual Learning Styles and Creativity. Creativity Research Journal 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195651.
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ Creative Thinking Process Stages: Implementation of Realistic Mathematics Education. Thinking Skills and Creativity 22, 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007.
Šorgo, A. (2012). Scientific Creativity: The Missing Ingredient in Slovenian Science Education. European Journal of Educational Research volume–1–2 (volume1-issue2.html): 127–41. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.1.2.127.
Sospedra-Baeza, M. J., Martínez-Álvarez, I., & Hidalgo-Fuente, S. (2022). Multiple intelligences, emotions, and creativity in first year spanish undergraduate students. Revista Digital de Investigacion En Docencia Universitaria, 16(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2022.1153
Steven, Chapra, & Raymond Canale. (2015). Numerical Methods for Engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Sukmawati, K. I., Irlianti, S., Wiyanti, W., & Arifin, S. (2023). The relationship between visual-spatial intelligence and logic-mathematic intelligence. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2886(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0154655
Sumalee, C., Charuni, S., & Issara, K. (2012). The Learner’s Creative Thinking Learning with Learning Innovation to Encourage Human Thinking. European Journal of Social Sciences. researchgate.net.
Suseno, I., Suendarti, M., Supeno, S., & Suhendar, Y. (2023). The Relevance of Mathematical Critical Thinking Skill with Numerical Intelligence and Learning Independence. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v13i2.16228
Talib, A. (2021). Creative Thinking Ability In Mathematics Problem Solving Reviewed by The Personality Type of Senior High School Students In Makassar City. Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v9i2.22327
Tiang-uan, A. (2025). Exploring Thai Pre-Service Teachers’ Responding Patterns and Pragmatic Strategies in the Impromptu Q&A Oral Presentation Abilities of the Post-Presentation. Educational Process: International Journal 15. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.15.95
Ureña-Villamizar, Y. C., Henao-Gómez, M. A., Vargas-Velásquez, O. A., Ramírez-Ramírez, J. R., & Fernández-Nieto, E. L. (2024). Ma-Tecn: Innovative model to promote logical-mathematical competencies. Aibi, Revista de Investigacion Administracion e Ingenierias, 12(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.15649/2346030X.3781
Wijirahayu, S., & Ayundhari, V. L. (2018). Classroom Experience of Creative Thinking. UICELL Proceeding. researchgate.net.
Yao, X., Wang, S., Dang, J., & Wang, L. (2012). The Role of Individualism-Collectivism in the Individual Creative Process. Creativity Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.730001
Yuan, J., & Wu, Y. (2024). Exploring the Abilities-Cultivation Model for Students in Undergraduate Academies in China. Education as Change 28. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/15142.