Understanding Students’ Learning Preferences: The Use of VARK-Based Strategies in the LMS

Background/purpose. This study examines integrating the VARK learning style model into Learning Management Systems (LMS) to create more personalized learning experiences. The VARK model classifies the learners as Visual, Auditory, Reading, Writing, or Kinesthetic, enabling tailored instructional strategies.

Materials/methods. By employing an explanatory mixed-methods design, the study involved 62 Malaysian undergraduates who completed a survey and participated in interviews.

Results. The quantitative data revealed a strong preference for visual and auditory learning styles, with moderate support for kinesthetic and writing activities, while reading seems less preferred. The qualitative data provided context, illustrating the role of visual aids, verbal explanations, and hands-on activities in enhancing comprehension and engagement.

Conclusion. The study addresses a research gap on the impact of VARK-based adjustments in LMS environments, suggesting adaptive digital learning strategies to improve engagement, comprehension, and learning outcomes in higher education. These findings emphasise the value of multimodal strategies to meet the diverse learning preferences within LMS platforms.

Keywords: VARK model, LMS, higher education, teaching approaches, learning style

References

Aldosari, M. A., Aljabaa, A. H., Al-Sehaibany, F. S., & Albarakati, S. F. (2018). Learning style preferences of dental students at a single institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, were evaluated using the VARK questionnaire. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 9, 179– 186. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S157686

Alkhasawneh, I. M., Mrayyan, M. T., & Docherty, C. (2008). Problem-based learning (PBL): Assessing students’ learning preferences using VARK. Nurse Education Today, 28(5), 572–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2007.09.012

Aunhabundit, N., & Lu, A. C. C. (2024). Visualizing success: Amplifying learning outcomes across VARK learning preferences through visual notes. Science, Technology, and Social Sciences Procedia, 6, 1–15.

Azmy, M. I., Alparuq, P., Ardiansyah, R., Cahyana, W., & Adela, D. (2021). Growing students’ learning interest through the use of integrated e-learning media in daily activities. Jurnal BELAINDIKA (Pembelajaran dan Inovasi Pendidikan), 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.52005/belaindika.v3i1.61

Benabbes, K., Housni, K., Hmedna, B., Zellou, A., & El Mezouary, A. (2023). Explore the influence of contextual characteristics on the learning understanding of LMS. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16823–16861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11899-y

Bernard, J., Chang, T.-W., Popescu, E., & Graf, S. (2017). Learning style identifier: Improving the precision of learning style identification through computational intelligence algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications, 75, 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.021

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Dey, B., & Panda, B. N. (2024). Understanding the learning style preferences of ODL students using VARK model: Implications for individualized pedagogy and student success. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(5), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJESS/2024/v50i51365

Erlandson, D. A. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Sage.

El-Saftawy, E. E., Latif, A. A. A., ShamsEldeen, A. M., Alghamdi, M. A., Mahfoz, A. M., & Aboulhoda, B. E. (2024). Influence of applying VARK learning styles on enhancing teaching skills: Application of learning theories. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1034. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-04517-2

El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on students' engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4

El Mezouary, A., Hmedna, E., & Baz, O. (2021). An unsupervised method for discovering how learners progress toward understanding in MOOCs. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 10(5), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639- 023-11899-y

Fahim, A., Rehman, S., Fayyaz, F., Javed, M., Alam, M. A., Rana, S., Jafari, F., & Alam, M. K. (2021). Identification of preferred learning style of medical and dental students using VARK questionnaire. BioMed Research International, 2021(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4355158

Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 24(2), 50–55.

Haryana, L., Astina, T., & Kurniawati, H. (2020, March). Exploring the VARK learning styles of Islamic junior high school students. In Proceedings of the 22nd Istanbul International Conference on Literature, Humanities and Social Science (ILHSS-20) (pp. 2-4). Academic Research Publishing Network.

Hasan, N., Rana, R. U., Chowdhury, S., Dola, A. J., & Rony, M. K. K. (2021). Ethical considerations in research. Journal of Nursing Research, Patient Safety and Practise (JNRPSP) 2799-1210, 1(01), 1-4. http://journal.hmjournals.com/index.php/JNRPSP

Kanchon, M. K. H., Sadman, M., Nabila, K. F., Tarannum, R., & Khan, R. (2024). Enhancing personalized learning: AI-driven identification of learning styles and content modification strategies. International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering, 5, 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcce.2024.06.002

Krumpal, I. (2024). Social desirability bias and context in sensitive surveys. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6527–6532). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2895

Liew, S. C., Sidhu, J., & Barua, A. (2015). The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-clinical undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909- 015-0327-0

Maidin, N. A., Sapuan, S. M., Taha, M. M., & Yusoff, M. Z. M. (2022). Material selection of natural fibre using a grey relational analysis (GRA) approach. BioResources, 17(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.17.1.109-131

Mozaffari, H. R., Janatolmakan, M., Sharifi, R., Khatony, A., & others. (2020). The relationship between the VARK learning styles and academic achievement in dental students. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 11, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S235002

Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Newton, P. M., & Salvi, A. (2020). How common is belief in the learning styles neuromyth, and does it matter? A pragmatic systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 5, 602451. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.602451

Obeng, A. (2023). Consequential effects of using competing perspectives to predict learning style in e-learning systems. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2218960. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218960

Payaprom, S., & Payaprom, Y. (2020). Identifying learning styles of language learners: A useful step in moving towards the learner-centred approach. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.712646

Prithishkumar, I. J., & Michael, S. A. (2014). Understanding your student: Using the VARK model. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 60(2), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.132337

El-Saftawy, E., Latif, A. A. A., ShamsEldeen, A. M., Alghamdi, M. A., Mahfoz, A. M., & Aboulhoda, B. E. (2024). Influence of applying VARK learning styles on enhancing teaching skills: Application of learning theories. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1034. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05979-x

Sedani, S., Abdeli Sultan Ahmadi, J., & Faeedfar, Z. (2016). A study on the learning styles of the students of Urmia University of Medical Sciences based on VARK: Developing critical thinking, liveliness and achievement motivation. Nursing and Midwifery Journal, 13(12), pp. 1089–1096.

Sheeba, T., & Krishnan, R. (2019). Automatic detection of students’ learning styles in a learning management system. In W. Leal Filho & A. M. Azul (Eds.), Smart technologies and innovation for a sustainable future (pp. 71–78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-030-01659-3_7

Sofer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2018). Effectiveness of learning in online academic courses compared with face‐to‐face courses in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12258

Warmbrod, J. R. (2014). Reporting and interpreting scores derived from Likert-type scales. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(5), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.05030

Whitman, G. M. (2023). Learning styles: Lack of research-based evidence. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 96(3), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2023.2203891

Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The scientific status of learning styles theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315589505

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!