Professional Development Effectiveness: The case of Palestinian EFL Teachers

Background/purpose. In-service training is essential for EFL teacher development, yet its success depends on impacting motivation, self-confidence, knowledge, and classroom practices. This research was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a specific professional development program for Palestinian EFL teachers, aiming to understand its impact on these core aspects and identify implementation challenges.

Materials/methods. A quantitative design was employed with a cohort of 50 Palestinian EFL teachers. Data were collected via a validated questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.92) measuring perceptions of the program's impact on motivation, self-confidence, TEFL knowledge, and classroom practice. An open-ended question gathered data on challenges. Responses were analyzed using SPSS for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative responses.

Results. Participants reported positive improvements across all measured areas (Mean scores: Motivation=3.39, Classroom Practice=3.22, Knowledge=3.21, Confidence=3.19). The program had the strongest impact on teacher motivation. Significant differences were found based on teaching experience and grade level taught, with early-career teachers and those teaching higher grades (9+) reporting more positive outcomes. No significant difference was found based on gender. Major challenges included logistical issues, long training hours, financial burdens, and inconvenient scheduling on weekends.

Conclusion. The study concludes that the in-service training program was effective in enhancing teachers' professional capacities, particularly their motivation. However, its overall sustainability and effectiveness are hindered by significant contextual and logistical challenges. To maximize impact, future programs require structural modifications to reduce participant burden and better accommodate teachers' specific contexts and schedules.

Keywords: Professional development, Teacher training, EFL teachers, Teacher education, EFL training

References

Abuhmaid, A. (2020). The effectiveness of in-service training programs for Palestinian teachers: Perspectives from the field. Journal of Educational Development, 15(2), 45–60.

Asmari, A. (2016). Professional development impact on Saudi EFL teachers: A mixed-methods study. TESOL International Journal, 11(1), 78–95.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Borg, S. (2018). Teacher evaluation: Global perspectives and their implications for English language teaching. British Council.

Crandall, J., & Miller, S. (2013). Effective professional development for language teachers. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. Brinton, & M. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 630–648). Heinle and Heinle.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.

Farrell, T. S. C. (2019). Reflective practice in ELT. Equinox Publishing.

Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588114

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

Han, J., & Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development, and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1217819. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819

Kennedy, M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800

Khalil, M., & Abed, O. (2021). The impact of AMIDEAST training programs on Palestinian EFL teachers’ competencies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(3), 412–420.

Liu, Y. (2020). Technology integration in EFL teacher training: A case study from China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1752745

Richards, J. C. (2017). Teaching English through English: Proficiency, pedagogy, and performance. RELC Journal, 48(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217690059

Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Sharkey, J. (1994). Helping teachers become better students: A case study in EFL teacher training. TESOL Journal, 4(2), 12–16.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wyatt, M., & Dikilitaş, K. (2016). English language teachers are becoming more efficacious through research engagement at their Turkish university. Educational Action Research, 24(4), 550–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1076731

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!