Explanatory Sequential Study on Word Problem-Solving and Mathematical Cognitive Skills of College Students: Implications for STEM Competencies Development
Article Number: e2025506 | Available Online: October 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.18.506
Rica Mae D. Rio , Judel V. Protacio
Full text PDF |
5296 |
1803
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. The strategic goal of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) literacy is to develop scientifically and technologically equipped global citizens who are innovators and problem-solvers in a rapidly changing world. The study contributes to this goal by drawing pedagogical implications from examining college students’ word problem-solving skills, their perceptions of the role of mathematical cognitive skills, and the factors that hinder successful word problem-solving. Materials/methods. An explanatory sequential design was used, with the quantitative phase assessing college students’ word problem-solving skills and the qualitative phase examining their perceptions of mathematical cognitive skills and hindering factors to explain variations in word problem-solving performance. Results. College students demonstrated fundamental-level word problem-solving ability, highlighting the inherent difficulty in navigating complex cognitive tasks. The variations in problem-solving proficiency, shaped by nuanced differences in cognitive development, instructional practices experienced, and available learning opportunities, influence the problem-solving approaches undertaken, the perception of problem-solving complexity, and the use of strategies in overcoming problem-solving barriers. |
Conclusion. College students recognize the crucial role of mathematical cognitive skills in solving word problems. However, the prevalence of hindering factors underscores that cognitive skills alone do not decisively translate into successful problem-solving. Enhancing word problem-solving competencies in the context of STEM education requires the adoption of a systemic approach that integrates the enhancement of cognitive skills, the implementation of strategic and differentiated interventions responsive to varying levels of problem-solving ability, and the creation of supportive learning environments fostered by technology-based, collaborative, reflective, and integrative teaching practices.
Keywords: College mathematics education, higher order thinking, mathematics learning impediments, key sustainability competencies, mixed methods research
ReferencesAchmetli, K., Schukajlow, S., & K. Rakoczy, K. (2019). Multiple solutions for real-world problems, experience of competence and students’ procedural and conceptual knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 1605-1625, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9936-5
Ahmed Khan, Z., Adnan, J., & Adnan Raza, S. (2023). Cognitive learning theory and development: Higher education case study. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110629
Akama, K. (2006). Relations among self-efficacy, goal setting, and metacognitive experiences in problem-solving. Psychological Reports, 98, 895-907. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.98.3.895-907
Aljura, A. N., Retnawati, H., Dewanti, S. R., Kassymova, G. K., Sotlikova, R., & Septiana, A. R. (2025). Mathematical reasoning and communication word problems with mathematical problem-solving orientation: A relation between the skills. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2), 529–558. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i2.pp529-558
Amalina, I., & Vidakovich, T. (2023). Cognitive and socioeconomic factors that influence the mathematical problem-solving skills of students. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19539
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman & Co.
Barroso, C., Ganley, C., McGraw, A., Geer, E., Hart, S., & Daucourt, M. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 147, 134–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000307
Boonen, A., de Koning, B., Jolles, J., & Van der Schoot, M. (2016). Word problem solving in contemporary math education: a plea for reading comprehension skills training. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00191
Booth, J. L., & Davenport, J. L. (2013). The role of problem representation and feature knowledge in algebraic equation-solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 415-423, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.04.003
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage Publications.
Butterworth, B. (2019). Dyscalculia: From science to education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315538112
Chinn, S. (2021). Mathematics learning difficulties, dyslexia and dyscalculia. Routledge.
Cirillo, M., & Hummer, J. (2021). Competencies and behaviors observed when students solve geometry proof problems: An interview study with smartpen technology. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53, 861-875, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01221-w
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715614171
Commission on Higher Education (CHED). (2013, June 28). CHED memorandum order no. 20, series of 2013. CHED. ched.gov.ph
Cragg, L., & Gilmore, C. (2018). Skills underlying mathematics: The role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(2), 63-68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949313000422
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Daroczy, G., Meurers, D., Heller, J., Wolska, M., & Nürk, H. C. (2015). The interaction of linguistic and arithmetic factors affects adult performance on arithmetic word problems. Cognitive Processes, 21(1), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00948-5
Di Biase, R., Malatesta, S., & Schmidt di Friedberg, M. (2022). Promoting education for sustainable development in the Maldives: Exploring the link between theory and practice. Prospects, 52, 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09558-6
Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60 years? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508
Eberz, S., Lang, S., Breitenmoser, P., & Niebert, K. (2023). Taking the lead into sustainability: Decision makers’ competencies for a greener future. Sustainability, 15, 4986. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064986
Emslander, V., & Scherer, R. (2022). The relation between executive functions and math intelligence in preschool children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 148(5-6), 337–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000369
Ernest, P. (2010). Reflections on theories of learning. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 39-47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_4
Fatmanissa, N., & Novianti, M. N. (2022). Linguistic challenges in solving mathematics word problems: A case of EFL university students. In Eighth Southeast Asia Design Research (SEA-DR) & the Second Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture, and Humanity (STEACH) International Conference (SEADR-STEACH 2021) (pp. 16-23). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211229.003
Filiz, A., & Gür, H. (2025). Students’ Perceptions and Applications of Metacognitive Awareness Levels in Problem Solving with ChatGPT. Educational Process: International Journal, 14, e2025063. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.63
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.) McGraw-Hill.
Gamazo, A., & Martinez-Abad, F. (2020). An exploration of factors linked to academic performance in PISA 2018 through data mining techniques. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 575167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.575167
Geary, D. C., Nicholas, A., Li, Y., & Sun, J. (2017). Developmental change in the influence of domain-general abilities and domain-specific knowledge on mathematics achievement: An eight-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 680–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000159
Gilmore, C., Göbel, S. M., & Inglis, M. (2022). An introduction to mathematical cognition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315684758
Goos, M., & Kaya, S. (2020). Understanding and promoting students’ mathematical thinking: A review of research published in ESM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103, 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09921-7
Greenfield, E. A., & Moorman, S. M. (2019). Childhood socioeconomic status and later life cognition: Evidence from the Wisconsin longitudinal study. Journal of Aging and Health, 31(9), 1589-1615. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6478570/
Hannell, G. (2005). Dyscalculia. David Fulton Publishers Ltd.
Hiltrimartin, C., & Pratiwi, W. (2025). Problem-solving skills among students on the topic of derivatives: Differences in the changes of achievement emotions. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(6), em2645. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16504
Ji, Z., & Guo, K. (2023). The association between working memory and mathematical problem solving: A three-level meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1091126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1091126
Karakolidis, A., Pitsia, V., & Emvalotis, A. (2016). Examining students’ achievement in mathematics: a multilevel analysis of the programme for international student assessment (PISA) 2012 data for Greece. International Journal of Educational Research 79, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.013
Kievit, R. A., Hofman, A. D., & Nation, K. (2019). Mutualistic coupling between vocabulary and reasoning in young children: A Replication and extension of the study by Kievit et al. (2017). Psychological Science, 30(8), 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619841265
Lazarevic, L. B., & Orlic, A. (2018). PISA 2012 mathematics literacy in Serbia: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. Psihologija, 51, 413–432. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI170817017L
Lee, K., Ng, E. L., & Ng, S. F. (2019). The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013843
Loes, C. N., & Pascarella, E. T. (2015). The benefits of good teaching extend beyond course achievement. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i2.13167
Lu, D., & Xie, Y. (2024). The application of educational technology to develop problem-solving skills: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101454
Masjudin, M., Muzaki, A., Abidin, Z., & Ariyanti, A. (2020). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521, 032063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032063
Miller, P. H. (2011). Piaget's theory: Past, present, and future. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-22950-025
Mills, N. J. D. (2021). ALEKS constructs as predictors of high school mathematics achievement for struggling students. Heliyon, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07345
Molnár, G., Greiff, S., & B. Csapó, B. (2013). Inductive reasoning, domain specific and complex problem solving: Relations and development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 35-45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.03.002
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822
Ngu, B. H., & Phan, H. P. (2023). Differential instructional effectiveness: Overcoming the challenge of learning to solve trigonometry problems that involved algebraic transformation skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(4), 1505–1525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00670-5
Ngu, B. H., & Phan, H. P. (2016). Comparing balance and inverse methods on learning conceptual and procedural knowledge in equation solving: A cognitive load perspective. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 11(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2015.1047836
Nguyen, H. A., Guo, Y., Stamper, J., & McLaren, B. M. (2020). Enhancing Students' Problem-Solving Flexibility in Non-Routine Mathematics In I. Bittencourt, M. Cukurova, K. Muldner, R. Luckin, & E. Millán (Eds), Artificial Intelligence in Education (409-413). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_74
Novak, E., & Tassell, J. L. (2017). Studying preservice teacher math anxiety and mathematics performance in geometry, word, and non-word problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.005
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume 1): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). Country note: PISA result 2018(Philippines). OECD Publishing.
Ogut, B., Webb, B., Hicks, J., Circi, R., & Yin, M. (2024). Exploring mathematical problem-solving through process mining: Insights from large-scale assessment log data. Computers in the Schools, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2024.2416422
Özkubat, U., & Karabulut, A. (2021). Cognitive strategy instruction for mathematical problem solving. In Kargın, T. Güldenoğlu, B. İ. (Eds), Teaching Mathematics in Special Education (pp. 142–171). Pegem Academy Publishing.
Özkubat, U., & Özmenb, E. R. (2021). Investigation of effects of cognitive strategies and metacognitive functions on mathematical problem solving performance of students with or without learning disabilities. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4), 443-456. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.203
Pedro, E., Leitão, J., & Alves, H. (2020). Stakeholders' Perceptions of Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions: An Intellectual Capital Approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(5), 911-942. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2020-0030
Peng, P., & Kievit, R. (2020). The development of academic achievement and cognitive abilities: A bidirectional perspective. Child Development Perspectives, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12352
Peng, P., Namkung, J., Barnes, M., & Sun, C. (2016). A meta-analysis of mathematics and working memory: Moderating effects of working memory domain, type of mathematics skill, and sample characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000079
Peng, P., Wang, T., Wang, C., & Lin, X. (2019). A meta-analysis on the relation between fluid intelligence and reading/mathematics: Effects of tasks, age, and social economics status. Psychological Bulletin, 145, 189–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000182
Pentang, J. T., Andrade, L. J. T., Golben, J. C., Talua, J. P., Bautista, R. M., Sercenia, J. C., Permatasari, D., Bucad, Jr., M. L., & Viernes, M. D. D. (2024). Problem-solving difficulties, performance, and differences among preservice teachers in Western Philippines University. The Palawan Scientist, 16(1), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.69721/TPS.J.2024.16.1.07
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203981528
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc773pk
Pongsakdi, N., Kajamies, A., Veermans, K., Lertola, K., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2020). What makes mathematical word problem solving challenging? Exploring the roles of word problem characteristics, text comprehension, and arithmetic skills. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 52, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01118-9
Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2017). The power of comparison in mathematics instruction: Experimental evidence from classrooms. In D. C. Geary, D. B. Berch, & K. M. Koepke (Eds.), Ngu and Phan Mathematical cognition and learning: Acquisition of complex arithmetic skills and higher-order mathematics concepts (pp. 273–295). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805086-6.00012-6
Rocha, H., & Babo, A. (2024). Problem-solving and mathematical competence: A look to the relation during the study of linear programming. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101461
Rocha, H., Viseu, F., & Matos, S. (2024). Problem-solving in a real-life context: An approach during the learning of inequalities. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/13828
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
Schudmak, W. (2014). Metacognitive strategies employed during mathematical problem solving: a comparative case study of fifth graders who are gifted and have ADHD. [Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University].
Shaw, S. R. (2022). Reaching and teaching students who don’t qualify for special education: Strategies for the inclusive education of diverse learners (1st ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003133896
Simamora, R. E., & Saragih, S. (2019). Improving students' mathematical problem-solving abilities and self-efficacy through guided discovery learning in a local cultural context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3966
Sinakou, E., Donche, V., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Designing powerful learning environments in education for sustainable development: A conceptual framework. Sustainability, 11, 5994. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215994
Snowling, M., & Hulme, C. (2021). The Science of reading: A handbook (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Soto-Ardila, L. M., Caballero-Carrasco, A., & Casas-García, L. M. (2022). Teacher expectations and students' achievement in solving elementary arithmetic problems. Heliyon, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09447
Spencer, M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2020). Language-related longitudinal predictors of arithmetic word problem solving: A structural equation modeling approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101825
Spiegel, J. A., Goodrich, J. M., Morris, B. M., Osborne, C. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2021). Relations between executive functions and academic outcomes in elementary school children: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000322
Sposab, K., & Rieckmann, M. (2024). Development of sustainability competencies in secondary school education: A scoping literature review. Sustainability, 16(23), 10228. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310228
Süß, H. M., & Kretzschmar, A. (2018). The Impact of Cognitive Abilities and Prior Knowledge on Complex Problem-Solving Performance: Empirical Results and a Plea for Ecologically Valid Microworlds. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-22, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00626
Sweeney, C. M. (2010). The metacognitive functioning of middle school students with and without learning disabilities during mathematical problem solving. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Miami].
Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability, 12(23), 10113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113
Tatto, M. T. (2013). Teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics. Technical Report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Teplá, M., & Distler, P. (2025). The impact of long-term inquiry-based science education on students’ motivation and knowledge acquisition: The role of gender, subject, and level of inquiry. Palgrave Communications, 12(1), 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04437-3
Terwee, C., Bot, S., de Boer, M., van der Windt, D., Knol, D., Dekker, J., Bouter, L., & de Vet, H. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34 – 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
Testa, I., & Catena, D. (2022). High school students’ performances in transitions between different representations of linear relationships in mathematics and physics. Education Sciences, 12(11), 776. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110776
Tchoshanov, M., & Monarrez, A. (2024). Analyzing teacher-designed tasks through the lens of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 24, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-024-00319-z
Tourón, J., López-González, E., Lizasoain-Hernández, L., García-San Pedro, M. J., & Navarro-Asencio, E. (2018). Spanish high and low achievers in science in PISA 2015: Impact analysis of some contextual variables. Revista de Educacion, 380, 156–184. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2017-380-376
Tursynkulova, E., Madiyarov, N., Sultanbek, T., & Duysebayeva, P. (2023). The effect of problem-based learning on cognitive skills in solving geometric construction problems: A case study in Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1284305
Vandenbroucke, L., Spilt, J., Verschueren, K., Piccinin, C., & Baeyens, D. (2018). The classroom as a developmental context for cognitive development: A meta-analysis on the importance of teacher–student interactions for children's executive functions. Review of Educational Research, 88, 125–164. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743200
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
Vessonen, T., Hellstrand, H., Kurkela, M., Aunio, P., & Laine, A. (2025). The effectiveness of mathematical word problem-solving interventions among elementary schoolers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 132, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102642
von Davier, M., Kennedy, A., Reynolds, K., Fishbein, B., Khorramdel, L., Aldrich, C., Bookbinder, A., Bezirhan, U., & Yin, L. (2024). TIMSS 2023 International Results in Mathematics and Science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. https://doi.org/10.6017/lse.tpisc.timss.rs6460
Wang, X., Perry, L., Malpique, A., & Ide, T. (2023). Factors predicting mathematics achievement in PISA: A systematic review. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 11, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00174-8
Weaver, K. (2018). Pragmatic paradigm. In The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation (Vol. 4, pp. 1287-1288). SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n534
Xie, F., Zhang, L., Chen, X., & Xin, Z. (2020). Is spatial ability related to mathematical ability: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 113–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09496-y
Yusoff, A. S. M., Durairaj, K., Mohamed, R., Peng, F. S., Abdullah, N., Ismail, H., Salleh, S. M., & Wahid, Z. (2022). Communication in mathematics among school children: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 28(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.28.2.275290
Zhoc, K. C., Webster, B. J., King, R. B., Li, J. C., & Chung, T. S. (2019). Higher education student engagement scale (HESES): Development and psychometric evidence. Research in Higher Education, 60, 219-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9510-6
Zhu, H., Zhang, J., Li, H., Huang, B., Feng, H., Liu, C., & Si, J. (2024). Independent and joint effects of perceived teacher support and math self-efficacy on math achievement in primary school student: Variable-oriented and person-oriented analyses. Learning and Individual Differences, 112, 102445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102445