Instructional Leadership in Practice: A Qualitative Exploration of Public Elementary Master Teachers’ Identity Formation and Influence in the Philippines
Article Number: e2025482 | Available Online: September 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.18.482
Philip R. Baldera
Full text PDF |
5364 |
3296
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. Master Teachers (MTs) in the Philippines are positioned at the Highly Proficient level of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST), expected to model exemplary practice, mentor peers, and drive school improvement. Their role is reinforced by Relational Development Learning (RDL), which emphasizes coaching, mentoring, peer feedback, and reflective dialogue as a means of ongoing professional development. However, little is known about how MTs enact instructional leadership in practice, how their identities evolve in response to policy shifts and challenges, and how they perceive their influence on colleagues and the school culture. This study explores their lived experiences as classroom teachers and leaders in public elementary schools. Materials/methods. Using transcendental phenomenology, the study engaged twelve purposively selected MTs from six public schools through interviews, observations, and artifact sharing. Data were analyzed via a modified van Kaam method, with AI-assisted coding validated by the researcher. Triangulation, reflective analysis, and bracketing enhanced trustworthiness. Results. MTs lead through mentoring, collaboration, and classroom modeling, acting as relational rather than authoritative leaders. Their identities shift with reflective practice, PPST expectations, and contextual constraints. They see their influence extending to professional learning communities and school-wide quality. |
Conclusion. MTs’ leadership is rooted in relational influence, distributed leadership, and mentoring. Insights informed a micro-coaching model and log sheet aligned with SDG 4, Target 4.c.
Keywords: Master Teachers, instructional leadership, teacher identity, teacher leadership, micro-coaching model, micro-coaching log sheet, Philippine education, qualitative research, distributed leadership, reflective practice, SDG 4 Quality Education
ReferencesAcheampong, K. O., & Nyaaba, M. (2024). Review of Qualitative Research in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.468692
Adetayo, A. J., Aborisade, M. O., & Sanni, B. A. (2024). Microsoft Copilot and Anthropic Claude AI in education and library services. Library Hi Tech News. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-01-2024-0002
Alemdag, E. (2022). A scoping review of the literature on embodied instructional videos. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 029. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18029
Aris, R. F. R. (2021). Teacher leadership: A literature review. Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought, 11, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.37134/jcit.vol11.4.2021
Brooks, C. (2021). Teacher identity, professional practice and online social spaces. In N. Walshe & G. Healy (Eds.), Geography education in the digital world: Linking theory with practice (pp. 7–16). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429274909‑2
Cansoy, R., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2021). Instructional leadership in a centralized and competitive educational system: A qualitative meta-synthesis of research from Turkey. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(6), 702–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-04-2021-0073
Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., Zhang, S., De Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2024). Research avenues supporting embodied cognition in learning and instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09847-4
Christou, P. (2023). How to use artificial intelligence (AI) as a resource, methodological and analysis tool in qualitative research? The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406
Cordero, J., Torres-Zambrano, J., & Cordero-Castillo, A. (2024). Integration of generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Best practices. Education Sciences, 15(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010032
Cruz-González, C., Rodríguez, C. L., & Segovia, J. D. (2020). A systematic review of principals’ leadership identity from 1993 to 2019. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219896053
Dangal, M. R., & Joshi, R. (2020). Hermeneutic phenomenology: Essence in educational research. Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 4(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0401.03025d
Dugas, D. (2021). The identity triangle: Toward a unified framework for teacher identity. Teacher Development, 25(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2021.1874500
Farrell, E. (2020). Researching lived experience in education: Misunderstood or missed opportunity? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920942066
Golob, S. (2021). Self-awareness and the “I” in the phenomenological tradition. In Self (pp. 267–286). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190087265.003.0013
Golzar, J. (2020). Teacher identity formation through classroom practices in the post-method era: A systematic review. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1853304. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2020.1853304
Gümüş, S., Hallinger, P., Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2019). Teacher leadership and educational change. School Leadership & Management, 39(2), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1574964
Hallinger, P., & Kulophas, D. (2019). The evolving knowledge base on leadership and teacher professional learning: A bibliometric analysis of the literature, 1960–2018. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1623287
Konst, T., & Kairisto-Mertanen, L. (2020). Developing an innovation pedagogy approach. On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 28(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/oth-08-2019-0060
Kovács, I. J., Szivák, J., & Czachesz, E. (2021). How do master teachers plan to renew early childhood education in Hungary? The five-year plans of the master programmes and their implementations. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2021.00025
Larsen, H. G. (2023). Eight domains of phenomenology and research methods (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270058
Liu, A., & Sun, M. (2023). From voices to validity: Leveraging large language models (LLMs) for textual analysis of policy stakeholder interviews. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2312.01202
Lovett, S. (2023). Teacher leadership and teachers’ learning: Actualizing the connection from day one. Professional Development in Education, 49(6), 1010–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2235583
Mhagama, M. (2024). Microteaching practicum as an avenue for student teachers to learn the art of improvising instructional materials. International Journal of Education Foundations, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.33687/ijef.001.01.0001
Obermeier, M. L. (2024). Best practices for integrating artificial intelligence in higher education. Ubiquity Proceedings, 34, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5334/uproc.156
Pan, H. W., Wiens, P. D., & Moyal, A. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the teacher leadership scholarship. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103936
Raza, M. Z., Xu, J., Lim, T., Boddy, L., Mery, C. M., Well, A., & Ding, Y. (2025). LLM-TA: An LLM-enhanced thematic analysis pipeline for transcripts from parents of children with congenital heart disease. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2502.01620
Reyna, K. M., & Baguio, E. L. (2025). Reinventing the role of master teachers in the digital age. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 15(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.15.03.2025.p15902
Richmond, G., Bartell, T. G., Floden, R. E., & Jones, N. D. (2019). How research sheds light on the pivotal role of mentors in teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119887752
Rushton, E. A. C., Smith, E. R., Steadman, S., & Towers, E. (2023). Understanding teacher identity in teachers’ professional lives: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Education, 11(2), e3417. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3417
Schwartz, D. L. (2024). Achieving an adaptive learner. Educational Psychologist, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2024.2397389
Soriano, B. M. (2025). Teachers’ perspectives on the implementation of instruction under the Matatag curriculum. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2025.v05i06.001
Syafaruddin, S., Salim, S., & Hamdan, H. (2020). The leadership of the principal of Madrasa in implementing the Madrasa Tsanawiyah Al Ittihadiyah curriculum program at Pangkalan Masyhur Medan. FITRAH Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman, 6(2), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v6i2.3353
Ye, A., Maiti, A., Schmidt, M., & Pedersen, S. J. (2024). A hybrid semi-automated workflow for systematic and literature review processes with large language model analysis. Future Internet, 16(5), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16050167