The Role of Emoji Feedback on Students' Assessment and Learning Outcomes
Article Number: e2025471 | Available Online: September 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.18.471
Mahadi Hasan Miraz , Narishah Mohamed Salleh , Mohammad Tariq Hasan , James Bakul Sarkar , Mohammad Faridul Alam
Full text PDF |
3731 |
2584
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. This study investigates the impact of emoji feedback on students' assessments and learning outcomes. Aims include emotions in feedback systems to assess the effects of feedback, learning outcomes, and general performance, among other educational outcomes. Materials/methods. This study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining a systematic literature review with Python and a conceptual framework design. This study is aligned with constructivist learning theory, cognitive load theory, and dual coding theory. Using a random sampling approach, the researchers collected data from 380 respondents at global universities. The author designed self-administered surveys using Google Forms, which were distributed via WhatsApp, social media, and email to collect data. PLS-SEM was used to investigate the validity and reliability of the data. Results. This study revealed that expressive emoji feedback can make comments more interesting, emotionally meaningful, and understandable. This study presents a new feedback method that aligns with current digital communication trends to create a more stimulating, motivating, and productive learning environment, thereby advancing educational technology. The findings will provide legislators and educators with fresh information to adopt innovative feedback strategies that improve their pupils' learning experiences and outcomes. |
Conclusion. Emojis were used for instructive feedback in this study. The academic use of emojis is understudied despite their prevalence in informal communication. This supports integrating nonverbal cues into feedback mechanisms to improve students' emotional and cognitive processing.
Keywords: Emoji, Emotional, outcome, performance, feedback
ReferencesAl-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2019). PLS-SEM in information systems research: a comprehensive methodological reference. In: Hassanien, A., Tolba, M., Shaalan, K., Azar, A. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2018. AISI 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 845, 644-653. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99010-1_59
Alshaya, S. A. (2025). Enhancing Educational Materials: Integrating Emojis and AI Models into Learning Management Systems. Computers, Materials & Continua, 83(2), 3075. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.062360
Anglin, G. J., Vaez, H., & Cunningham, K. L. (2013). Visual representations and learning: The role of static and animated graphics. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 854-905). Routledge.
Angraini, L. M., Kania, N., & Gürbüz, F. (2024). Students' Proficiency in Computational Thinking Through Constructivist Learning Theory. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v2i1.963
Aubouin-Bonnaventure, J., Chevalier, S., Lahiani, F.-J., & Fouquereau, E. (2024). Well-being and performance at work: a new approach favourable to the optimal functioning of workers through virtuous organisational practices. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(4), 608-623. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-01-2023-3584
Bartel, L., Ochs, M., Hirmer, T., & Henrich, A. (2024). Design Principles for a Study Planning Assistant in Higher Education. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (pp. 243-253).
Bowen, J. (2014). Emotion in the classroom: An update. To Improve the Academy, 33(2), 196-219.
Braumann, S., van de Pol, J., Kok, E., Pijeira-Díaz, H. J., van Wermeskerken, M., de Bruin, A. B., & van Gog, T. (2024). The Role of Feedback on Students' Diagramming: Effects on Monitoring Accuracy and Text Comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 76, 102251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102251
Chen, Q., Wu, Q., & Jacucci, G. (2025). Democratic Moderation: Exploring the Use and Perception of Votekicking in Social Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-18).
Ciampa, K. (2014). Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 82-96.
Cui, J., Dandan, Y. R., Yang, B., & Jing, Y. (2024). Which emoji are markers of sarcasm among Chinese teenagers using the WeChat app? Heliyon, 10(23), e39796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39796
Ezeh, N. G., Anidi, O. C., & Nwokolo, B. O. (2021). Body Language as a Communicative Aid amongst Language Impaired Students: Managing Disabilities. English Language Teaching, 14(6), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n6p125
Frantiska, J. (2019). Words. Interface Development for Learning Environments: Establishing Connections Between Users and Learning, 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14482-1
Gan, Z., An, Z., & Liu, F. (2021). Teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation, and feedback behavior: how are they associated with learning outcomes? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 697045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697045
Göçen, A., & Bulut, M. A. (2024). Teaching ethics in teacher education: ICT-enhanced, case-based and active learning approach with continuous formative assessment. Journal of Academic Ethics, 22(3), 447-465.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Fischer, A., Nitzl, C., & Menictas, C. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research, 12(1), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0072-4
Halimi, F., AlShammari, I., & Navarro, C. (2021). Emotional intelligence and academic achievement in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(2), 485-503. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-11-2019-0286
Hart, S. R., Stewart, K., & Jimerson, S. R. (2011). The student engagement in schools questionnaire (SESQ) and the teacher engagement report form-new (TERF-N): Examining the preliminary evidence. Contemporary School Psychology: Formerly" The California School Psychologist", 15(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03340964
Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pylväs, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2019). The concept of active learning and the measurement of learning outcomes: A review of research in engineering higher education. Education Sciences, 9(4), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276
Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in educational evaluation, 38(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
Hew, K. F., Huang, W., Du, J., & Jia, C. (2023). Using chatbots to support student goal setting and social presence in fully online activities: learner engagement and perceptions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(1), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09338-x
Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(1), 5215722. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722
Ignacio, M. J., Julhamid, N., & Asiri, M. (2024). Teachers’ feedback and English academic achievement of grade 8 and 9 students at Sulu State College Laboratory High School. Journal of Education and Academic Settings, 1(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.62596/fvr96v47
Jaeger, S. R., Cardello, A. V., & Schutz, H. G. (2013). Emotion questionnaires: A consumer-centric perspective. Food Quality and Preference, 30(2), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.05.015
Jeong, J. Y., Oh, J., & Jeong, J. W. (2024). Enhancing learner experience with instructor cues in video lectures: A comprehensive exploration and design discovery toward a novel gaze visualization. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 21411-21447.
Johnson, G., & Connelly, S. (2014). Negative emotions in informal feedback: The benefits of disappointment and drawbacks of anger. Human Relations, 67(10), 1265-1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714532856
Jones, C. A., & Davison, A. (2021). Disempowering emotions: The role of educational experiences in social responses to climate change. Geoforum, 118, 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.11.006
Kang, J. (2024). Benefits and Challenges of Mobile-Learning Brought to Student Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Systematic Review from 2014-2023. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 2107-2123. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i1/20698
Kim, M., Knotts, T. L., Albers, N. D., & James, K. E. (2022). Emoji use as a catalyst for relationship building and sustaining attention in online classes: An empirical study. Education Sciences, 12(12), 874. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120874
Kimbark, K., Peters, M. L., & Richardson, T. (2017). Effectiveness of the student success course on persistence, retention, academic achievement, and student engagement. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(2), 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2016.1166352
Kyndt, E., Govaerts, N., Verbeek, E., & Dochy, F. (2014). Development and validation of a questionnaire on informal workplace learning outcomes: A study among socio-educational care workers. The British Journal of Social Work, 44(8), 2391-2410. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct056
Laudenbach, M., Brown, D. W., Guo, Z., Ishizaki, S., Reinhart, A., & Weinberg, G. (2024). Visualizing formative feedback in statistics writing: An exploratory study of student motivation using DocuScope Write & Audit. Assessing Writing, 60, 100830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100830
Lee, I., & Mao, Z. (2024). Writing teacher feedback literacy: Surveying second language teachers’ knowledge, values, and abilities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 63, 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101094
Li, J. (2025). Sentiment analysis of text based on emoji attention mechanisms: a new approach to online course evaluation. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 26(8), 70-86. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijict.2025.145724
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Adaptive motivation and emotion in education: Research and principles for instructional design. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 228-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732216644450
Lukyanenko, R., & Parsons, J. (2020). Research perspectives: design theory indeterminacy: what is it, how can it be reduced, and why did the polar bear drown? Journal of the association for information systems, 21(5), 10-17705.
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2024). How personalized and effective is immersive virtual reality in education? A systematic literature review for the last decade. Multimedia tools and applications, 83(6), 18185-18233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15986-7
Martins, V. W. B., Rampasso, I. S., Anholon, R., Quelhas, O. L. G., & Leal Filho, W. (2019). Knowledge management in the context of sustainability: Literature review and opportunities for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 489-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.354
Mhlanga, D. (2024). Digital transformation of education, the limitations and prospects of introducing the fourth industrial revolution asynchronous online learning in emerging markets. Discover education, 3(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00115-9
Morawski, M., & Budke, A. (2019). How digital and oral peer feedback improves high school students’ written argumentation—A case study exploring the effectiveness of peer feedback in geography. Education Sciences, 9(3), 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030178
Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292
Niyomves, B., Kunacheva, N., & Sutadarat, S. (2024). Hybrid Learning: A combination of face-to-face and online learning. Journal of Education and Learning Reviews, 1(3), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.60027/jelr.2024.673
Núñez, J. C., Regueiro, B., Suárez, N., Piñeiro, I., Rodicio, M. L., & Valle, A. (2019). Student perception of teacher and parent involvement in homework and student engagement: The mediating role of motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 444577. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01384
Olmos-Gómez, M. d. C., Estrada-Vidal, L. I., Ruiz-Garzón, F., López-Cordero, R., & Mohamed-Mohand, L. (2019). Making future teachers more aware of issues related to sustainability: An assessment of best practices. Sustainability, 11(24), 7222. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247222
Olofsson, A. D., Lindberg, J. O., Fransson, G., & Hauge, T. E. (2015). Uptake and use of digital technologies in primary and secondary schools–a thematic review of research. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(Jubileumsnummer), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn1891-943x-2015-jubileumsnummer-08
Padgett, C., Moffitt, R. L., & Grieve, R. (2021). More than words: Using digital cues to enhance student perceptions of online assignment feedback. The internet and higher education, 49, 100789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100789
Pandita, A., & Kiran, R. (2023). The technology interface and student engagement are significant stimuli in sustainable student satisfaction. Sustainability, 15(10), 7923. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107923
Pekrun, R. (2017). Emotion and achievement during adolescence. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12237
Rachmi, R., Asri, A., Nuswantoro, P., & Mokodenseho, S. (2024). The Influence of Emotional Intelligence and Effective Communication on Interpersonal Relationship Quality and Life Satisfaction in Indonesia. The Eastasouth Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 1(02), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.58812/esssh.v1i02.213
Rahman, R., & Bazmi, B. (2025). L2 Students’ Rapport Management with their Teacher Using Emojis in WhatsApp Messaging. Language, Identity and the Digital Realm, 1(2), 89-132.
Ramayah, T., Yeap, J., Ahmad, N. H., Halim, H. A., & Rahman, S. A. (2017). Testing a confirmatory model of Facebook usage in SmartPLS using consistent PLS. International Journal of Business and Innovation, 3(2), 1-14.
Reidel, M., & Salinas, C. (2024). If students don’t feel it, they won’t learn it: Early career secondary social studies educators plan for emotional engagement. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 48(2), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/23522798231219967
Rose, D. H., Robinson, K. H., Hall, T. E., Coyne, P., Jackson, R. M., Stahl, W. M., & Wilcauskas, S. L. (2018). Accurate and informative for all: Universal design for learning (UDL) and the future of assessment. Handbook of accessible instruction and testing practices: Issues, innovations, and applications, 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71126-3_11
Rowe, A. D., & Fitness, J. (2018). Understanding the role of negative emotions in adult learning and achievement: A social functional perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 8(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8020027
Saramandi, A., Au, Y. K., Koukoutsakis, A., Zheng, C. Y., Godwin, A., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Jewitt, C., Jenkinson, P. M., & Fotopoulou, A. (2024). Tactile emoticons: Conveying social emotions and intentions with manual and robotic tactile feedback during social media communications. PLoS One, 19(6), e0304417. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304417
Scheibe, S., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Emotional aging: Recent findings and future trends. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp132
Scherr, S., Polst, S., Müller, L., Holl, K., & Elberzhager, F. (2019). The perception of emojis for analyzing app feedback. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(2), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i02.8492
Serrano-Ausejo, E., & Mårell-Olsson, E. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of using immersive technologies to support students’ spatial ability and 21st-century skills in K-12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 5571-5597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11981-5
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2023). Culture, Emotion, and (Im) politeness Evaluations. In Advancing (Im) politeness Studies: Cultural, Digital and Emotional Aspects (pp. 15-32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37064-9_2
Strijbos, J.-W., Pat-El, R., & Narciss, S. (2021). Structural validity and invariance of the feedback perceptions questionnaire. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100980
Suliman, W. M. M. (2024). Emojis in EFL Communication: An Analysis оf the Language-Like Functions in Emoji Use by Saudi Female Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(1), 154-159. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1401.18
Szeto, M. D., Barber, C., Ranpariya, V. K., Anderson, J., Hatch, J., Ward, J., Aguilera, M. N., Hassan, S., Hamp, A., & Coolman, T. (2022). Emojis and emoticons in health care and dermatology communication: narrative review. JMIR dermatology, 5(3), e33851. https://doi.org/10.2196/33851
Vogel‐Walcutt, J. J., Gebrim, J., Bowers, C., Carper, T., & Nicholson, D. (2011). Cognitive load theory vs. constructivist approaches: which best leads to efficient, deep learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 133-145.
Vytasek, J. M., Patzak, A., & Winne, P. H. (2020). Analytics for student engagement. Machine learning paradigms: Advances in learning analytics, 158, 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13743-4_3
Waaramaa, T., & Leisiö, T. (2013). Perception of emotionally loaded vocal expressions and its connection to responses to music. A cross-cultural investigation: Estonia, Finland, Sweden, Russia, and the USA. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 47905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00344
Walter, N., Ortbach, K., & Niehaves, B. (2015). Designing electronic feedback–analyzing the effects of social presence on perceived feedback usefulness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 76, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.12.001
Warburton, W. A., Mohi, S., Sweller, N., Tarabay, C., Spencer, L., & Olsen, K. (2024). Violent and prosocial music: Evidence for the impact of lyrics and musical tone on aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Aggressive behavior, 50(3), e22148. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.22148
Weissman, B., & Tanner, D. (2018). A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony: How the brain processes ironic emojis during language comprehension. PLoS One, 13(8), e0201727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201727
Williams, A. (2024). Delivering Effective Student Feedback in Higher Education: An Evaluation of the Challenges and Best Practice. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 10(2), 473-501. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3404
Winstone, N. E. (2022). Characterising feedback cultures in higher education: an analysis of strategy documents from 134 UK universities. Higher education, 84(5), 1107-1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00818-8
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners' agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational psychologist, 52(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
Yang, S.-B., Hlee, S., Lee, J., & Koo, C. (2017). An empirical examination of online restaurant reviews on Yelp. com: A dual coding theory perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(2), 817-839. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-11-2015-0643
Zarkadoulas, D., & Virvou, M. (2024). Emotional expression in mathematics e-learning using emojis: A gender-based analysis. Intelligent Decision Technologies(Preprint), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3233/idt-240170
Zhoc, K. C., Chung, T. S., & King, R. B. (2018). Emotional intelligence (EI) and self‐directed learning: Examining their relation and contribution to better student learning outcomes in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 982-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3472