OCAP and Ubuntu: An Educational Framework for Ethical Consciousness in Community-Based Participatory Research

Background/purpose. Unethical research conduct, particularly resource harvesting and neglecting knowledge holders, persists despite global regulations. Whether deliberate or unintentional, this outcome precipitates data exploitation, erosion of trust, and non-compliance among the individuals involved. The current study emphasizes the consciousness of stakeholders to mitigate exploitative vulnerabilities.

Materials/methods. An exploratory qualitative research design was employed for this study. Five stakeholders were strategically involved in conceptualizing the OCAP framework and the Ubuntu philosophical foundation, presenting the concepts as a strategic framework to facilitate ethical community-based participatory research practices. The qualitative data collected through one-on-one interviews, guided by semi-structured questionnaires, were analyzed using a content analysis approach.

Results. The OCAP concept represents a significant advancement in the ethical conduct of research involving grassroots communities, emphasizing ownership, control, access, and possession of any outcomes. This perspective aligns seamlessly with the core principles of Ubuntu, centered on interconnectedness, shared responsibility, respect, and mutual upliftment, as opposed to individualism.

Conclusion. OCAP and Ubuntu provide a blueprint for ethical participatory research, including conduct, policy, and regulations. While researchers must adhere, it is equally essential to ensure that grassroots community members understand their rights, as such development promises resilience against potential exploitation.

Keywords: Educational process, ethical research, knowledge harvesting, grassroots communities, OCAP, Ubuntu

References

Andrews, N., & Okpanachi, E. (2012). Trends of epistemic oppression and academic dependency in Africa’s development: The need for a new intellectual path. Journal of Pan African Studies, 6(10), 45–62.

Appiah, R. (2020). Community-based participatory research in rural African contexts: Ethico-cultural considerations and lessons from Ghana. Public Health Reviews, 41(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-020-00145-2

Bain, L. E., Akondeng, C., Njamnshi, W. Y., Mandi, H. E., Amu, H., & Njamnshi, A. K. (2022). Community engagement in research in sub-Saharan Africa: current practices, barriers, facilitators, ethical considerations and the role of gender-a systematic review. Pan African Medical Journal, 43(1), 1-23. 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.152.36861

Bruhn, J. (2014). Identifying useful approaches to the governance of indigenous data. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 5(2), 1-32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48766872

Chigevenga, R. (2022). Decolonising research methodologies in the Global South: Experiences of an African social scientist. African Journal of Social Work, 12(4), 199-206.

Cornish, F., Breton, N., Moreno-Tabarez, U., Delgado, J., Rua, M., de-Graft Aikins, A., & Hodgetts, D. (2023). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3(1), 34.

Ewuoso, C., & Hall, S. (2019). Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 12(2), 93-103. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1c8f827d83

Ewuoso, C., Wonkam, A., & de Vries, J. (2022). Epistemic justice, African values and feedback of findings in African genomics research. Global Bioethics, 33(1), 122-132. 10.1080/11287462.2022.2124019

First Nations Information Governance Centre (FNIGC). (2014). Ownership, Control, Access, and Possession (OCAP™): The Path to First Nations Information Governance. Ottawa, ON: FNIGC.

Gelmon, S. B., Jordan, C., & Seifer, S. D. (2013). Community-engaged scholarship in the academy: An action agenda. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45(4), 58-66.

Hlalele, D., & Mabasa, L. T. (2025). The struggles for research ethics and integrity in rural communities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Rural and Community Studies, 7(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijrcs-2024.vol7.2.01

Horan, C., & Omeife, N. (2020, December). Engaged Scholarship: How to Improve University Engagement within Academic-Industry Relationships. In ECKM 2020, 21st European Conference on Knowledge Management (p. 344). Academic Conferences International Limited. 10.34190/EKM.20.108

Iwara, I. O., & Kilonzo, B. M. (2022). Towards a conceptual understanding of an effective rural-based entrepreneurial university in South Africa. Social Sciences, 11(9), 1-15. 10.3390/socsci11090388

Koen, M. (2021). Sustainable future for early childhood: Applying the African Ubuntu philosophy to contribute to the holistic development of young children. Sustainable development in Africa: Fostering sustainability in one of the world's most promising continents, 131-146.

Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (2016). Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an Agenda. ANU Press. 10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016

Levac, L., Cattapan, A., Haley, T. L., Pin, L., Tungohan, E., & Wiebe, S. M. (2022). Transforming public policy with engaged scholarship: better together. Policy & Politics, 50(3), 403-424. 10.1332/030557321X16485722290035

Maiter, S., Simich, L., Jacobson, N., & Wise, J. (2008). Reciprocity: An ethic for community-based participatory action research. Action research, 6(3), 305-325.

Mangaliso, M. P. (2001). Building competitive advantage from Ubuntu: Management lessons from South Africa. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(3), 23-33. 10.5465/ame.2001.5229453

Marovah, T., & Mutanga, O. (2024). Decolonising participatory research: can Ubuntu philosophy contribute something?. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 27(5), 501-516.

Mkabela, Q. (2005). Using the Afrocentric method in researching indigenous African culture. The qualitative report, 10(1), 178-189.

Mupedziswa, R., Rankopo, M., & Mwansa, L. (2019). Ubuntu as a pan-African philosophical framework for social work in Africa. Social work practice in Africa: Indigenous and innovative approaches, 21-38.

Nussbaum, B. (2003). African culture and Ubuntu. Perspectives, 17(1), 1-12.

Ogone, J. O. (2017). Epistemic injustice: African knowledge and scholarship in the global context. In G. W. B. Goh & R. Kilbourn (Eds.), Postcolonial justice (pp. 17-36). Brill.

Oguamanam, C. (2019). Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Retooling Indigenous Resurgence for Development (July 7, 2019). Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) Paper Series, Paper # 234, December 5. online: https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/documents/no.234.pdf, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3997388 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3997388 (Accessed March 23 2025).

Olufadewa, I. I., Adesina, M. A., & Ayorinde, T. (2020). From Africa to the World: Reimagining Africa’s research capacity and culture in the global knowledge economy. Journal of Global Health, 10(1), 010321. 10.7189/jogh.10.010321

Paul, M. (2023). Looking to the Future: Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Policy in Canada. Pathfinder: A Canadian Journal for Information Science Students and Early Career Professionals, 4(1), 54-67. 10.29173/pathfinder71

Peterson, T. H. (2009). Engaged scholarship: Reflections and research on the pedagogy of social change. Teaching in higher education, 14(5), 541-552.

Rahman, M. M. (2023). Sample size determination for survey research and non-probability sampling techniques: A review and set of recommendations. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 11(1), 42-62.

Ryan, M., Hardaway Griffith, T., Okoro, G., Osborne, T., Bateman, L. B., Turan, J. M., ... & Oates, G. R. (2024). Overcoming Research Mistrust in African American Communities by Engaging Community Members as Research Team Members: Challenges and Opportunities. Health Equity, 8(1), 639-647. 10.1089/heq.2024.0050

Schnarch, B. (2004). Ownership, Control, Access, and Possession (OCAP) or Self-Determination Applied to Research: A Critical Analysis of Contemporary First Nations Research and Some Options for First Nations’ Communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 80-95.

Seehawer, M. K. (2018). Decolonising research in a Sub-Saharan African context: Exploring Ubuntu as a foundation for research methodology, ethics and agenda. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(4), 453-466.

Smajgl, A., & Ward, J. (2015). Evaluating participatory research: framework, methods and implementation results. Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 311-319. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.014

Turin, T. C., Lasker, M. A., Rahman, N., Rumana, N., & Chowdhury, N. (2023). ‘Engagement and involvement matrix’: a co-creation blueprint for inclusive community engaged research and knowledge mobilisation. Evidence-Based Nursing, 26(1), 4-9. 10.1136/ebnurs-2022-103644

Tynan, L. (2023). Data Collection Versus Knowledge Theft: Relational Accountability and the Research Ethics of Indigenous Knowledges. In H. Melber, U. Kothari, L. Camfield, & K. Biekart (Eds.), Challenging Global Development: Towards Decoloniality and Justice (pp. 139-164). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Ujomu, P. O. (2023). A Theory of the Indigenous Ubuntu Ethical Perspective. Етика, наука, образование, 1(1), 49-60.

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!