Exploring English Studies Majors' Interactions in Collaborative Research Teams as Communities of Practice

Background/purpose. Interactions encompass various aspects that support group members during collaboration; therefore, maintaining and fostering interactions in collaborative research teams (CRTs) as communities of practice (CoPs) in terms of shared knowledge, collective goals, and participation is crucial. The purpose of this study is to explore the interactions of English studies majors in CRTs perceived as CoPs.

Materials/methods. This study employed the phenomenological design, which relied on semi-structured interviews for data collection. The participants of this study consisted of 13 English major students from universities in EFL countries who had either participated in or were currently involved in CRTs for purposes such as graduation theses, publishing research articles, or university-level research projects.

Results. The findings from the thematic analysis assist in deliberating proposed interactions related to shared knowledge, collective goals, and participation during the collaborative processes in research groups. Regarding those critical indicators, the interactions are divided into three categories, each accompanied by specific interactions within its respective category. Most of the findings are correlated with theoretical frameworks and related studies. Additionally, several emergent findings are absent in three of the categories.

Conclusion. According to the research, English majors' Collaborative Research Teams (CRTs) in Vietnamese EFL contexts operate as socially motivated, goal-oriented learning communities where knowledge is jointly created via candid communication, shared accountability, and encouraging leadership.

Keywords: Collaborative Research, Communities of Practice, English Studies, Student Interaction, Shared Knowledge, Collective Goals, Participation

References

Abedini, A., Abedin, B., & Zowghi, D. (2021). Adult learning in online communities of practice: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1663–1694. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13120

Arinaitwe, D. (2021). Practices and strategies for enhancing learning through collaboration between vocational teacher training institutions and workplaces. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 13, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-021-00117-z

Bozeman, B., Gaughan, M., Youtie, J., Slade, C. P., & Rimes, H. (2016). Research collaboration experiences, good and bad: Dispatches from the front lines. Science and Public Policy, 43(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv035

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cheruvelil, K. S., Soranno, P. A., Weathers, K. C., Hanson, P. C., Goring, S. J., Filstrup, C. T., & Read, E. K. (2014). Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: The importance of diversity and interpersonal skills. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1890/130001

Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE.

Dikko, M. (2016). Establishing construct validity and reliability: Pilot testing of a qualitative interview for research in takaful (Islamic insurance). The Qualitative Report, 21(3), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2243

Dillman, D. A., & Christian, L. M. (2005). Survey mode as a source of instability in responses across surveys. Field Methods, 17(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X04269550

Dusdal, J., & Powell, J. J. W. (2021). Benefits, motivations, and challenges of international collaborative research: A sociology of science case study. Science and Public Policy, 48(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab010

Graesser, A., Kuo, B. C., & Liao, C. H. (2017). Complex problem-solving in assessments of collaborative problem-solving. Journal of Intelligence, 5(2), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5020010

Guimerà, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308(5722), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106340

Hall, K., Vogel, A., Huang, G., Serrano, K., Rice, E., Tsakraklides, S., & Fiore, S. (2018). The science of team science: A review of empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American Psychologist, 73(4), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000319

Hatch, J. A. (2023). Doing qualitative research in education settings (2nd ed.). State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438494623

Heaton, J. (2021). “*Pseudonyms are used throughout”: a footnote, unpacked. Qualitative Inquiry, 28(1), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211048379

John-Steiner, V., Weber, R. J., & Minnis, M. (1998). The challenge of studying collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 773–783. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831203500477

Jorgensen, R., Edwards, K., Scarso, E., & Ipsen, C. (2021). Improving public sector knowledge sharing through communities of practice. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 51(2), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2019-0115

Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P. A., & Janssen, J. (2011). Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.01.001

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2804509

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389

Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.003

Lochmiller, C. R. (2021). Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029–2044. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160- 3715/2021.5008

Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 11(3), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428

McKay, J., & Sridharan, B. (2023). Student perceptions of collaborative group work (CGW) in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 49(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2227677

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.

Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091

Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., & Eden, C. (2017). Thinking together: What makes communities of practice work? Human Relations, 70(4), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716661040

Roberts, R. E. (2020). Qualitative interview questions: Guidance for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 25(9), 3185–3203. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160- 3715/2020.4640

Rofik, A. (2022). The effect of collaborative problem-solving and collaborative project- based learning models to improve the project competencies of pre-service teachers. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(3), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.03.15

Rossoni, A. L., De Vasconcellos, E. P. G., & De Castilho Rossoni, R. L. (2023). Barriers and facilitators of university–industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: A systematic review. Management Review Quarterly, 74(3), 1841–1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2017). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Specht, A., & Crowston, K. (2022). Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes. PLOS ONE, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278043

Sun, C., Shute, V. J., Stewart, A., Yonehiro, J., Duran, N., & D’Mello, S. (2020). Toward a generalized competency model of collaborative problem-solving. Computers & Education, 143, 103672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103672

Tootell, A., Kyriazis, E., Billsberry, J., Ambrosini, V., Garrett-Jones, S., & Wallace, G. (2020). Knowledge creation in complex inter-organizational arrangements: Understanding the barriers and enablers of university–industry knowledge creation in science-based cooperation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(4), 743–769. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-06-2020-0461

Trương, V., Tran, N., & Thi, T. (2023). Conducting undergraduate research: EFL students’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(4), 818–830. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1404.12

Vasileiadou, E., & Vliegenthart, R. (2009). Research productivity in the era of the internet revisited. Research Policy, 38(8), 1260–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.005

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511803932

Xia, L., & Ya, S. (2012). Study on knowledge-sharing behavior engineering. Systems Engineering Procedia, 4, 468–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2012.01.012

Zurba, M., Petriello, M. A., Madge, C., McCarney, P., Bishop, B., McBeth, S., Denniston, M., Bodwitch, H., & Bailey, M. (2021). Learning from knowledge co-production research and practice in the twenty-first century: Global lessons and what they mean for collaborative research in Nunatsiavut. Sustainability Science, 17(2), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00996-x

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!