Volume 17 (2025) Download Cover Page

Difficulties in Learning Mathematics: Qualitative Studies Using NVivo 15

Article Number: e2025397  |  Available Online: August 2025  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.17.397

Widia Winata , Ririn Widiyasari , Surya Amami Pramuditya , Hidayatul Anwar , Kayla Putri Ramadhanty

Abstract

Background/purpose. The purposes of this study are to find out the difficulties experienced by Elementary students in learning mathematics, as well as students’ and teachers’ efforts to overcome those problems.

Materials/methods. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method. The data are collected using observation, interviews, focus group discussions, and documentation. The analysis used the Miles and Huberman model, assisted by NVivo 15 software. The informants are 170 people, consisting of students, teachers, parents, and experts.

Results. The results of the study reveal: 1) students' difficulties experienced in learning mathematics are caused by both external and internal factors. The external factors include: conventional teaching, online learning, mobile phones, and teaching materials that are considered difficult. Internal factors include fear of learning math, boredom, anxiety, carelessness, difficulty, inattention, mental block, not understanding, passivity, laziness, lack of focus, low concentration, low problem-solving, lack of confidence, and lack of enthusiasm. 2) The efforts taken by both students and teachers to solve those problems are to do enjoyable activities such as drawing, singing, storytelling, using technology, taking a break, playing games, drilling, rewarding, ice breaking, and watching (TV, videos, YouTube).

Conclusion. The difficulties experienced by students in learning mathematics can be overcome in various ways, such as the preparation of varied media, the use of technology, and addressing the individual needs of students.

Keywords: Mathematics, learning, difficult, qualitative, NVivo 15

References

Alemany-Arrebola, I., Ortiz-Gómez, M., del M., Lizarte-Simón, E. J., & Mingorance-Estrada, Á. C. (2025). The attitudes towards mathematics: analysis in a multicultural context. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04548-x

Aragón, E., Menacho, I., Navarro, J. I., & Aguilar, M. (2024). Teaching strategies, cognitive factors and mathematics. Heliyon, 10(9), e29831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29831

Aruvee, E., & Vintere, A. (2023, May 24). Overcoming mathematical anxiety to promote progress in mathematics during undergraduate engineering studies at university. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2023.22.TF215

Asp, L., Klapp, A., & Rosén, M. (2025). Does teaching quality matter for Nordic primary school students’ mathematics confidence and mathematics achievement? A multilevel structural equation analysis of Nordic TIMSS 2019 grade 4 data. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-025-00238-x

Asrifan, A., Octaberliana, L. R. O. R., Nursyam, N., Sudiati, R. S., Tasni, N., & Pajarianto, H. (2025). Constructivism and Robotics (pp. 39–68). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6165-8.ch003

Atin, S., Syakuran, R. A., & Afrianto, I. (n.d.). Implementation of Gamification in Mathematics m-Learning Application to Creating Student Engagement. In IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (Vol. 13, Issue 7). http://ivantehrunningman.blogspot.com/2015/04/gamification-

Chen, Q., Yan, Z., Moeyaert, M., & Bangert-Drowns, R. (2025). Mobile multitasking in learning: A meta-analysis of effects of mobilephone distraction on young adults’ immediate recall. Computers in Human Behavior, 162, 108432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108432

Chihodzi, B., Mwakapenda, W., & Ngulube, B. (2023). Ticks and crosses in primary mathematics assessments: What purpose do they serve? Pythagoras, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v44i1.647

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.

Desai, R., Rai, N., & Karekar, J. (2022). Optimum Use of LMS for Dynamic Mathematics Classrooms in Blended Mode. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(Special Issue 2), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v36is2/23075

Dintarini, M., Fuad, Y., & Budiarto, M. T. (2024). Examining undergraduate students’ abstraction of conic sections in a dynamic geometry environment. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 717–734. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i3.pp717-734

Fadilah, Priyanda, R., & Amalia, R. (2021). Analysis of external factors affecting students’ achievement student of mathematics education of samudra university. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012050

Fauzan, A., Harisman, Y., Yerizon, Y., Suherman, S., Tasman, F., Nisa, S., Sumarwati, S., Hafizatunnisa, H., & Syaputra, H. (2024). Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) to improve literacy and numeracy skills of elementery school students based on teacher’s experience. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p301-316

Fernández-Cézar, R., Jiménez-Alcázar, A., Huete, M. Á. H., Procópio, M. V. R., & García-Moya, M. (2024). Teaching practice: Contributions to Spanish prospective mathematics teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(10), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15200

Gustiningsi, T., Putri, R. I. I., & Hapizah, Z. (2024). LEPscO: Mathematical literacy learning environment for the Guru Penggerak program. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 661–682. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp661-682

Hamdani, M. F., & Priatna, N. (2023). Difficulties of state junior high school 1 Bangkinang students in online mathematics learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. 090021. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0156617

Han, J., Cai, C., Pan, W., Liu, H., & Xu, Z. (2024). Hybrid Proximal Policy Optimization—Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network Framework for Hosting Capacity Optimization in Renewable-Integrated Power Systems. Energies, 17(24), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246234

Hidayad, A., Ghufron, A., Hidayati, K., Larasati, C. N., Suratman, S., & Ashari, L. H. (2025). What does the Principal do to Improve the Reading Skills of Lower-Grade Students? Case Studies in Elementary Schools in Indonesia. Educational Process: International Journal, 16. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.16.191

Husna, N., Safrizal, S., & Husnani, H. (2024). Teacher difficulties in learning mathematics class V elementary school. Ensiklopedia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Saburai, 4(01), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24967/esp.v4i01.2052

Janardhanan, J., & Charles, M. A. A. (2024). Effectiveness of innovative techniques on Pupil’s achievement in mathematics among higher secondary students in selected school. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3230

Karagiannakis, G., Noël, M. P., Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Termine, C. (2024). Mathematical skills classification through primary education. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00267-8

Kholid, M. N., & Aisyah, N. N. (2025). Classification of Abstract Thinking in Solving Mathematical Problems. Educational Process: International Journal, 16. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.16.194

Kulkarni, R. (2025). Philosophy of mathematics – four issues (pp. 13–19). https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/811/16233

Kumar, S. (2024). Impact of Assessment on Childhood Education Theories and Practice (pp. 84–101). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0956-8.ch004

Lestari, P., Mardiyana, & Slamet, I. (2021). The need analysis of mathematics module based on problem-based learning to improve reasoning ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012025

Li, M. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Primary Mathematics Education: Investigating Internal and External Influences on Teacher Adoption. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10515-w

Lievore, R., Caviola, S., & Mammarella, I. C. (2025). Children with and without dyscalculia: How mathematics anxiety and executive functions may (or may not) affect mental calculation. Learning and Individual Differences, 121, 102693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102693

Lima, P. da S. N., Silva, L. das A., Felix, I. M., & Brandao, L. de O. (2019). Difficulties in Basic Concepts of Mathematics in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028658

López-Serentill, P. (2024). Mathematical knowledge of pre-service teachers when performing measurement estimation tasks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15169

Ma, W., Lin, X., Lou, J., Liu, Y., Tang, W., & Bao, Z. (2023). The impact of students’ cellphone-use and self-control on academic performance in traditional classroom. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(4), 591–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09824-6

Maarif, S. (2024). The power of algebra in the Quran and its everyday apllications. www.uhamka.ac.id

Mavuso, M. F. (2022). Exploring Senior Phase teachers’ competencies in supporting learners with specific learning difficulties: Implications for inclusive education. African Journal of Disability, 11. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v11i0.901

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis; A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE.

Nelson, G., Kiss, A. J., & Crawford, A. (2022). Developmental Distinctions in Mathematics for Students With Disabilities. In Handbook of Special Education Research, Volume I (pp. 259–271). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156857-22

OECD. (2023, December 5). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I and II)-Country Notes: Indonesia. Https://Www.Oecd.Org/En/Publications/Pisa-2022-Results-Volume-i-and-Ii-Country-Notes_ed6fbcc5-En/Indonesia_c2e1ae0e-En.Html.

Purwaningrum, J. P., Muzid, S., Siswono, T. Y. E., Masriyah, & Kurniadi, G. (2023). Validity of mathematics module based on character education with Kudus local content “Gusjigang” for dyscalculia students. 040067. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0126610

Qiu, Y., Pan, J., & Ishak, N. A. (2022). Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Improving Pupils’ Deep Learning in Primary School Mathematics Teaching in Fujian Province. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1362996

Setyo Utaminingsih, E., & Purwati, P. D. (2024). Characteristics of third-grade elementery school students and the importance of students character identification. Research and Development Journal Of Education, 10(2), 1066–1077. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v10i2.20500

Srikoon, S., Khamput, C., & Punsrigate, K. (2024). Effects of stemen teaching models on mathematical literacy and mathematical problem-solving. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 79–115. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2024.21.2.4

Sugilar, Rajati, T., & Achmad. (2021). A hierarchical component model of students’ difficulties of learning mathematics in a distance higher education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042053

Sun, J. (2016). Multi-dimensional alignment between online instruction and course technology: A learner-centered perspective. Computers & Education, 101, 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.003

Susiani, K., Suartama, I. K., & Suranata, K. S. (2022). Identification of the characteristics of elementary school scientific literacy. Social Science Journal, 12(2), 7541–7547. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365774858

Sutarni, S., Sutama, S., Prayitno, H. J., Sutopo, A., & Laksmiwati, P. A. (2024). The development of realistic mathematics education-based student worksheets to enhance higher-order thinking skills and mathematical ability. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p285-300

Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. L. (2016). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260485

Thinwiangthong, S., Ya-amphan, D., Sythong, P., & Ishizaka, H. (2024). The investigation of best practices on symbolic mathematical communication: A comparative study in Japan, Lao PDR, and Thailand. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 67–101. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2024.21.1.3

Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Wiley-Blackwell. www.wiley.com/go/tracy.

Van den Ham, A. K., & Heinze, A. (2022). Evaluation of a State-Wide Mathematics Support Program for at-Risk Students in Grade 1 and 2 in Germany. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 15(4), 687–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2022.2051651

Vintere, A. (2021). A study on learning difficulties related to dyscalculia and mathematical anxiety. 330–336. https://doi.org/10.22616/rrd.27.2021.047

Waswa, D. W., & Al-kassab, M. M. (2023). Mathematics Learning Challenges and Difficulties: A Students’ Perspective (pp. 311–323). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0447-1_27

Wolterinck, C., Poortman, C., Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. (2024). Assessment for Learning: Developing the required teacher competencies. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2022.2124912

Wu, X., Li, N., Wu, R., & Liu, H. (2025). Cognitive analysis and path construction of Chinese students’ mathematics cognitive process based on CDA. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89000-5

Yuberta, K. R., Mahdi, Y., Nari, N., & Yulivia, M. (2022). Analysis of factors affecting difficulties in learning mathematics during online learning. 020006. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112351

Yusri, R. D., Fauzan, A., & Yarman. (2023). Analysis of students’ mathematics learning difficulties during online learning using zoom meeting (Case study on student who has low interest in learning mathematics). 090019. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0150110

Zhang, Q., Wu, W., & Jiang, K. (2024). Standardising professional standards: A self-assessment scale for Chinese kindergarten teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 730–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2022.2124913