Dynamic Assessment as A Strategy to Enhance Deep Learning in Narrative Writing for Elementary School Students
Article Number: e2025385 | Available Online: August 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.17.385
Suparti Suparti , Milawati Milawati ,Abdul Kholiq
Full text PDF |
3426 |
987
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. This study aims to analyze the application and impact of dynamic assessment as an enhancement of deep learning in writing narratives for elementary school students. The main focus is DA can improve the quality of the learning process and outcomes through intervention, feedback, and reflective revision. Materials/methods. This study used a mixed-method approach with 61 6th-grade students as subjects. The DA process involved three main stages, namely 1) pretest; 2) intervention with four topics, namely text structure, linguistic features, grammar, and moral values in ceria; 3) post-test. Feedback was given in various forms, including peer assessment, direct written feedback from teachers, and technology-based interactive discussions through Wordwall. Results. The implementation of DA in elementary school students' narrative writing learning has a significant impact through three main stages: pretest, intervention, and post-test. DA supports mastery of text structure, linguistic features, grammar, and moral values with a responsive learning approach, such as peer assessment, class discussion, and the use of interactive digital media. Statistically, the average student score increased from 59.15 in the pretest to 75.85 in the post-test, with a significant increase (t=43.95, p<0.05). |
Conclusion. DA not only improves the technical quality of students' writing, but also supports mindful, meaningful, and joyful learning through reflective revision, personal experience connections, and fun learning activities. Implications of this study include the integration of DA into the curriculum, teacher training to understand scaffolding and formative feedback, and the use of interactive technologies to support deep, inclusive, and adaptive learning
Keywords: Dynamic assessment, deep learning, narrative writing, elementary education
ReferencesAnggraeni, S. W., Sunendar, D., & Cahyani, I. (2024). Exploration of Students' Difficulties and Teachers' Solutions in Narrative Writing Learning in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 8(4), 761-771. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v8i4.84982
Arwita, R. S., Fatimah, W., & HS, E. F. (2022). The Multiliteration Learning Model on Narrative Writing Skills in Elementary School. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(4), 689-695. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i4.53983
Bal, M. & Öztürk, E. (2025). The potential of deep learning in improving K-12 students' writing skills: A systematic review. British Educational Research Journal, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4120
Birjandi, P., & Sarem, S. N. (2012). Dynamic assessment (DA): An evolution of the current trends in language testing and assessment. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 747-753. https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol02/04/14.pdf
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Learning by reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021950
Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455-472). Academic press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012174698-8/50045-X
Curtis, E., Delaney, N., & Watson, M. (2024). Finding Joy, Meaning and Confidence in Writing: Using Embodied Arts-Based Practices with Children in the Elementary Grades. Early Childhood Education Journal, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01811-9
Iddings, A. C. D. (2014). Understanding the potential in elementary classrooms through dynamic assessment. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 1(1), 49-73. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.v1i1.49
Feriyanto, F., & Anjariyah, D. (2024). Deep Learning Approach Through Meaningful, Mindful, and Joyful Learning: A Library Research. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology, 5(2), 208-212. https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v5i2.321
Fiestas, C. E., & Peña, E. D. (2018). The dynamic assessment of narratives: A bilingual study. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 17(1), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.17.1.97
Frank, B., Simper, N., & Kaupp, J. (2018). Formative feedback and scaffolding for developing complex problem solving and modelling outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 552-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1299692
Fullan, M. and Langworthy, M. (2014) A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Technical Report. Pearson. https://staging.oer4pacific.org/id/eprint/5/
Gilbert, J., & Graham, S. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4–6: A national survey. The elementary school journal, 110(4), 494-518. https://doi.org/10.1086/651193
Goodarzi, A., & Namaziandost, E. (2025). A mixed-methods study on the effects of online dynamic assessment on L2 learners' motivation and speaking anxiety: Beyond the classroom perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100584
Grenner, E., Johansson, V., van de Weijer, J., & Sahlén, B. (2021). Effects of intervention on self-efficacy and text quality in elementary school students’ narrative writing. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 46(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2019.1709539
Habibi, M., Sukirno, T., Sukma, E., Suriani, A., & Putera, R. F. (2020). Direct writing activity: A strategy in expanding narrative writing skills for elementary schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4374-4383. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081003
Hall, C., Capin, P., Vaughn, S., Gillam, S. L., Wada, R., Fall, A.-M., Roberts, G., Dille, J. T., & Gillam, R. B. (2021). Narrative instruction in elementary classrooms: An observation study. The Elementary School Journal, 121(3), 454-483. https://doi.org/10.1086/712416
Hattie, J. A., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. NPJ Science of Learning, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13
Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (2002). Applications and challenges in dynamic assessment. Peabody journal of education, 77(2), 40-63. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930PJE7702_5
Hooper, S. R., Roberts, J. E., Nelson, L., Zeisel, S., & Kasambira Fannin, D. (2010). Preschool predictors of narrative writing skills in elementary school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018329
Hue, T. T. (2019). An overview of listening skill theories. Proceedings of Elt Upgrades, 978-604. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3591877
Karpov, Y. V., & Tzuriel, D. (2009). Dynamic Assessment: Progress, Problems, and Prospects. Journal of Cognitive Education & Psychology, 8(3).
Kramer, K., Mallett, P., Schneider, P., & Hayward, D. (2009). Dynamic Assessment of Narratives with Grade 3 Children in a First Nations Community. Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, 33(3). https://www.cjslpa.ca/detail.php?ID=983&lang=en
Kruiper, S. M., Leenknecht, M. J., & Slof, B. (2022). Using scaffolding strategies to improve formative assessment practice in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 458-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1927981
Kuchler, K. (2024). Development of a Narrative Dynamic Assessment to Evaluate the Language Learning Abilities of Multilingual Children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota). https://conservancy.umn.edu/items/a68de67b-9f05-4382-9ab8-c4de3eca25da
Li, K. L., Razali, A. B., & Baki, R. (2019). Writing narrative essays using e-book writing software: Analyses of students' digital written works. Journal of Asia tefl, 16(4), 1289. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.14.1289
Lubis, R. F. (2014). Writing Narrative Text. English Education: English Journal for Teaching and Learning, 2(1). 61—76. https://doi.org/10.24952/ee.v2i1.115
Martinez, M., & McGrath, D. (2014). Deeper learning: How eight innovative public schools are transforming education in the twenty-first century. New Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.26193355.
Peña, E. D., Gillam, R. B., Malek, M., Ruiz-Felter, R., Resendiz, M., Fiestas, C., & Sabel, T. (2006). Dynamic assessment of school-age children’s narrative ability: An experimental investigation of classification accuracy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(5), 1037-1057. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/074
Petersen, D. B., Chanthongthip, H., Ukrainetz, T. A., Spencer, T. D., & Steeve, R. W. (2017). Dynamic assessment of narratives: Efficient, accurate identification of language impairment in bilingual students. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(4), 983-998. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0426
Putri, N. F., Huda, T., & Devanti, Y. M. (2024). The Effect of Wordwall to the Quality of Students' Writing Skills. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture, 9(2). https://jurnal.unai.edu/index.php/acuity/article/view/3350
Qin, L., Dong, J., & Xuan, Q. (2025). Exploring Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Dynamic Assessment on Learners’ Efl Writing Performances: A Meta-Analysis. Available at SSRN 5119103. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5119103
Rohana, R. (2016). Writing Instructional Model for Elementary Education Program. International Journal of English Language Education, 4(1), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v4i1.8791
Ritonga, K. N., Kurniawan, R., & Yulianda, A. (2025). The Effect of Wordwall Media on Junior High School Students’ Narrative Writing Outcomes. INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 12(1), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.36232/interactionjournal.v12i1.2078
Shrestha, P. N. (2020). Dynamic assessment of students' academic writing. Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-55845-1
Smith, A., Leeman-Munk, S., Shelton, A., Mott, B., Wiebe, E., & Lester, J. (2018). A multimodal assessment framework for integrating student writing and drawing in elementary science learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2799871
Stern, R. L. (2019). The Case for Joy in Learning: Teacher and Students' Perceptions of Flow Experiences in Upper Elementary Classrooms. DePaul University. https://via.library.depaul.edu/soe_etd/168
Suhartono, S., Margana, A. P., & Yulia, Y. (2025). The Efficacy of Portfolio Dynamic Assessment Model for Language Learning: A Case Study in Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Educational Process: International Journal. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.17
Syafi'i, A., Munir, A., Anam, S. U., & Suhartono, S. (2024). Unleashing the power of supervisory feedback in academic writing: Strategies for timely undergraduate thesis completion. TEFLIN Journal, 35(2), 330-351. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v35i2/330-351
Syafii, A., Munir, A., Anam, S. U., & Suhartono, S. (2025). Unveiling Dynamics of Student Engagement in Thesis Supervision. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.33.1.16
van der Veen, C., Poland, M. (2012). Dynamic Assessment of Narrative Competence. In van Oers, B. (eds) Developmental Education for Young Children: International perspectives on early childhood education and development, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4617-6_7
Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wood-Kofonow, K. F. (2015). The significance of joy in the learning process. California Institute of Integral Studies. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/significance-joy-learning-process/docview/1728319427/se-2
Yusuf, N., Khairaty, N. I., & Nurjanah, S. (2025). Trends in Deep Learning Research as an Instructional Approach: A Bibliometric Analysis. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 14(2 Mei), 2377-2396. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.2192