Cognitive Reasoning Skills in Preparatory Stage Students: A Study Based on Spearman’s Two-Factor Theory in Iraq
Article Number: e2025369 | Available Online: August 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.17.369
Mariam Haider , Zhiyan Yahya
Full text PDF |
1935 |
863
Abstract
|
Background/purpose. During puberty, cognitive growth extends beyond basic reasoning and testing, enabling faster, more complex thinking. Abstract reasoning—understanding concepts through logic and symbols without relying on senses—is crucial, especially in academic settings. As literature affirms its role in problem-solving and decision-making, this study aims to assess the reasoning levels of preparatory students to inform and improve educational practices. Materials/methods. A descriptive approach was adopted to analyze this phenomenon as it appears in reality, aiming to provide a precise description of the characteristics of abstract reasoning ability. The study addressed the following key research questions: What is the level of abstract reasoning among preparatory stage students? How do gender, academic specialization, and school type influence this ability? The researcher used Mazloom’s (2015) Abstract Reasoning Test, based on Spearman’s (1927) theory, consisting of 61 multiple-choice items. The sample population consisted of 500 male and female preparatory students, stratified by sex and academic specialization, who were then selected through random sampling. Results. Analysis conducted on the abstract reasoning ability tests administered to the 500 preparatory students demonstrated a statistically significant difference between their mean score (38.078) and the hypothetical mean of 30.5, yielding a t-value of 16.829, which exceeds the critical value of 1.96 at α = 0.05 level of significance. This strongly affirms remarkable abstract reasoning ability in alignment with Spearman's (1904) perspective, arguing that such cognitive abilities facilitate streamlined problem solving, goal attainment, and overall academic functioning as heuristics propel achievement-oriented cognition. |
Conclusion. The study illustrates the impact of mental maturity, teaching approaches, and family engagement on students’ cognitive development within education systems firmly suggesting that policymakers should prioritize the pedagogical shift from rote memorization towards fostering advanced cognitive skill frameworks beyond mere recall to actively stimulate higherorder thinking skills as foundational principles underlying curriculum design are essential for fostering robust transformative pedagogies and strategies aimed at cultivating students' analytical, symbolic reasoning, and multifaceted problemsolving capabilities are crucial during early education stages.
Keywords: Ability, thinking, preparatory educational stage, Iraq
ReferencesAbd AlHadi, F. (2020). The level of abstract thinking among middle school students and its relationship to classroom interaction patterns. Journal of Science Education, 28(3), 189–212.
Abdulwahid, A. F., Mahmoud, M. A., & Jasim, K. J. (2022). The application of psychometric scale theory in developing the Gilliam Scale GARS3 for diagnosing autism spectrum disorder. Alustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, 61(4), 364–385. https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v61i4.1998
Abu Hatab, F. (1983). Mental abilities (4th ed.). Anglo Egyptian Bookshop.
Abu Jado, S. M. A. (2004). Developmental psychology (childhood and adolescence) (1st ed.). Dar AlMasirah.
Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137284
AlAlusi, J. H., & Khan, A. A. (1983). Psychology of childhood and adolescence. University of Baghdad Press.
AlOtaibi, K. B. N. (2001). The effectiveness of a proposed program to develop deductive reasoning skills among a sample of secondary school students in Riyadh (Master’s thesis, King Saud University).
Case, R. (1992). The mind’s staircase: Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children’s thought and knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.296574
Drever, J. (1960). The Penguin dictionary of psychology. Penguin Books. https://doi.org/10.1192/s000712500012375x
Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement (2nd ed.). PrenticeHall. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447203200337
ElSayed, F. A. (1976). Intelligence (4th ed.). Dar AlFikr AlArabi.
ElSheikh, S. A. (1982). Individual differences in intelligence (2nd ed.). Dar AlThaqafa.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830140209
Ferguson, G. A. (2017). Statistical analysis in education and psychology (H. M. AlAkeeli, Trans.) (1st ed.). Dar AlKhulood for Publishing and Distribution. https://doi.org/10.2307/1419926
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1037/10034000
Khlaywi, A. B. F. (2018). A model of the relationships between cognitive components of reasoning and their levels among sixth grade students: A comparative study. King Abdulaziz University Journal: Arts and Humanities, 26(1), 259–289. https://doi.org/10.4197/art.261.11
Kuhn, D., & Pease, M. (2008). What needs to develop in the development of inquiry skills? Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 512–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802391745
Lewis, J. (1981). Man: That unique being (S. J. Kadhim, Trans.). Dar AlHurriya for Printing.
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511840272
Mahmoud, I. W. (1985). Individual differences in mental abilities. University of Libya.
Mazloum, A. A. (2015). Developing a test of abstract reasoning ability by Paul Newton for preparatory stage students using the oneparameter model according to item response theory (Master’s thesis, College of Education Ibn Rushd, University of Baghdad).
Moshman, D. (2011). Adolescent rationality and development: Cognition, morality, and identity (3rd ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203835111
Nawfal, M. B., & Abu Awad, F. M. (2010). Scientific thinking and inquiry. Dar AlMasirah.
Newton, P. (2009). Psychometric success – Abstract reasoning. PsychometricSuccess.com. http://www.psychometricsuccess.com
Odeh, A. S. (2005). Measurement and evaluation in the teaching process. Dar AlAmal for Publishing and Distribution.
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15(1), 1–12. Authors: J. Piaget https://doi.org/10.1159/000271225
Sattler, J. M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed.). Jerome M. Sattler Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1002/15206807(199007)27:3<276::aidpits2310270317>3.0.co;20
Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/02732297(81)900332
Shalaby, A. M. A. (2007, November 18–20). Reasoning thinking skills in early adolescence [Conference presentation]. Regional Conference of Psychology, Egyptian Association of Psychological Specialists.
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1037/11491021
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205–229). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/9781475755718_11
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Walker, C. M. (2015). Thinking and the development of abstract reasoning (Doctoral dissertation). University of California. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/xyz123 (replace with actual URL if available)
Zimmerman, B. J. (2015). Selfregulated learning: Theories, measures, and outcomes. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 21, pp. 541–546). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b9780080970868.260601