Abstract

Conclusion. The characteristics of the scenarios that could potentially trigger students’ SI and increase their understanding of STEM careers were as follows. Firstly, adopting a problem-based approach that integrates novel scientific practices to increase active engagement among students; secondly, transferring science concepts to a real-world personally relevant context so that students can identify the links between classroom discussions and genuine workplace environments; and thirdly, allowing students to interact informally with experts in order to integrate the STEM career component.

Keywords: Career-based scenarios, situational interest, interest in mathematics, STEM careers, Muhibbah Summer programme.

Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545

Al-Aqil, M., Alshaya, F., & Aljughaiman, A. (2019). The effect of using suggested enrichment scientific activities in developing the creative thinking of gifted students in the primary stage. The Scientific Journal of King Faisal University, 20(1), 81–31. https://services.kfu.edu.sa/scientificjournal/Handlers/FileHandler.ashx?file=h2015.pdf&Folder=UploadFiles

Albusaif, W., & Aljughaiman, A. (2020). Efficiency of male and female teachers’ nomination of gifted students through the national project to identify gifted students in the light of some variables. Scientific Journal of Psychological Sciences, 66(4), 157–173. https://search-mandumah-com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/Record/1137319

Aldaoud, F. (2010). The effect of using an indicative program for imagination training in reducing shyness behavior among a sample of gifted female students at the primary stage in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Arabian Gulf University.

Aljughaiman, A. (2008). Teacher training in gifted education programs in the Arab World. Scientific Book of the Arab Organization for Culture, Science and Education.

Aljughaiman, A. (2010). The oasis enrichment model: Comprehensive care for promising talents. Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 13(1), 75–99. https://journaldatabase.info/articles/oasis_enrichment_model_comprehensive.html(openin a new window)

Aljughaiman, A. (2011-a, June-December). An investigation of some predictive variables for high and low achievement among a sample of gifted students in primary schools. The Arab Journal of Education, 31(1), 184–225. http://search .shamaa.org/ FullRecor d?ID=90350

Aljughaiman, A. (2011-b). Evaluation of math and science summer enrichment programs in Saudi Arabia. The Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 20(2), 10–22.

Aljughaiman, A. (2011-c). The impact of school enrichment programs on the development of creative thinking skills, the tendency towards learning, and the development of motivation towards achievement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Research, 1(26), 22–39.

Aljughaiman, A. (2012). Teaching performance of gifted teachers in implementing oasis enrichment model in Saudi public education schools. Journal of King Saud University, Educational Sciences and Islamic Studies, 25(2), 54–70.

Aljughaiman, A. (2019). The methods used in identifying gifted students in the Hamdan Foundation in the light of the experiences of the Arabian Gulf countries and international standards. Hamdan Bin Rashid Al Maktoum Foundation for Educational Excellence.

Aljughaiman, A., Ayoub, A., Maajeeny, O., Abuoaf, T., Abunaser, F., & Banajah, S. (2009). Evaluating gifted enrichment program in schools in Saudi Arabia. Ministry of Education.

Aljughaiman, A., Nofal, M., & Hein, S. (2016). Gifted education in Saudi Arabia: A review. In D. Y. Dai & C. C. Kuo (Eds.), Gifted education in Asia: Problems and prospects (pp. 191–212). IAP Information Age Publishing.

Al-Nafi’, A., Al-Qate’i, A., Al-Dhabiban, S., Al-Hazmi, M., & Al-Saleem, A. (2000). The gifted identification and care program. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology.

AlQahtani, F. (2009). Investigating the impact of a telementoring program on gifted high school students in Saudi Arabia. Unpublished Ph.D, La Trobe University

Al-Qarni, M. A. (2010). Evaluation of provisions for gifted students in Saudi Arabia. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Wollongong.

Alsorour, N. H. (2003). An Approach to Education of the Gifted and Talented. Beirut: Dar Al Fikr

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

Barrows, H. (1996). Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996, 3–12. https://doi.org/1 0.1002/T L.372 199668 04

Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2013). Schools that make a difference to post-compulsory uptake of physical science subjects: Some comparative case studies in England. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 663–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.641131

Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3

Blustein, D. L., Barnett, M., Mark, S., Depot, M., Lovering, M., Lee, Y., Hu, Q., Kim, J., Backus, F., Dillon-Lieberman, K., & DeBay, D. (2013). Examining urban students’ constructions of a STEM/career development intervention over time. Journal of Career Development, 40(1), 40–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845312441680

Christidou, V. (2011). Interest, attitudes and images related to science: Combining students’ voices with the voices of school Science, teachers, and popular science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(2), 141–159.

Department of Education and Skills, Ireland. (2017). STEM education policy statement 2017–2026. Retrieved 11 December 2024 from https://www.education.ie/en/The-Education-System/STEM-Education-Policy/stem-education-policy-statement-2017-2026-.pdf

Dodgson, E. (2019). Reflexivity in qualitative research. Reflexivity in Qualitative Research,35 (2019), 220–222. https://doi.org/10.117 7/0890334419830990

Education Bureau of Government of Hong Kong SAR. (2016). Report on promotion of STEM education: Unleashing potential in innovation. Retrieved 24 December 2024 from https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/renewal/STEM%20 Education%20Report_Eng.pdf

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. (2018). Insights into skill shortages and skill mismatch: Learning from Cedefop’s European skills and jobs survey. Cedefop.

European Schoolnet. (2017). STEM education. http://www.eun.org/focu s-areas/stem

Gago, J. M., Ziman, J., Caro, P., Constantinou, C. P., Davies, G. R., Parchmann, I., Rannikmae, M., & Sjoberg, S. (2005). Europe needs more scientists: Increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe. Report by the High Level Expert Group on Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe, European Commission: DG Research, Science and Society Programme, ISBN 92-894-8458-6.

Habig, S., Blankenburg, J., van Vorst, H., Fechner, S., Parchmann, I., & Sumfleth, E. (2018). Context characteristics and their effects on students’ situational interest in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1154–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470349

Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105

Hidi, S. (2001). Claiming place: Biracial young adults of the post-Civil Rights era. Choice Reviews Online, 38(11), 38-6500–38-6500. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-6500

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612

Kang, J., Keinonen, T., Simon, S., Rannikmäe, M., Soobard, R., & Direito, I. (2019). Scenario evaluation with relevance and interest (SERI): Development and validation of a scenario measurement tool for context-based learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1317–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9930-y

King Abdul-Aziz and His Companions Foundation for the Gifted. (2008). "Mawhiba" Summer Gifted Education Programs' Guide. Unpublished document housed at the King Abdul-Aziz and His Companions Foundation for the Gifted, Riyadh.

Kotkas, T., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2017). A theory-based instrument to evaluate motivational triggers perceived by students in stem career-related scenarios. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 836–854. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.836

Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. M. (2013). Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project-based approach. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315205014

Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1 080/09500693.2010.518645

Kudenko, I., Simarro, C., & Pintó, R. (2017). Fostering European students’ STEM vocational choices (pp. 323–338). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_24

Lent, R. W., Hackett, G., & Brown, S. D. (1999). A social cognitive view of school-to-work transition. Career Development Quarterly, 47(4), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1999.tb00739.x

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 647-671. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0013164409355699

Lykkegaard, E., & Ulriksen, L. (2019). In and out of the STEM pipeline – a longitudinal study of a misleading metaphor. International Journal of Science Education, 41(12), 1600–1625. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1622054

Maajini, O. (2006). Evaluation of summer enrichment programs at King Abdulaziz and His Companions Foundation for the Gifted. Unpublished scientific report Mawhiba.

Mawaddah, S., & Anisah, H. (2015). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakag) di SMP Model Pembelajaran Generatif (Generative Learning) di SMP. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 166– 175. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v3i2.644

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications Inc.

Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-depth interviewing: Principles, techniques, analysis. Addison Welsey Longman.

Office of the Chief Scientist. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Australia’s future. Australian Government.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en

Oz, E., & Kloser, M. (2021). Middle school students’ motivational dispositions and STEM career attitudes. Paper presented at the 2021 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association [Virtual Conference].

Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20263

Palmer, D., Dixon, J., & Archer, J. (2017). Using situational interest to enhance individual interest and science-related behaviours. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9526-x

Ravindran, V. (2019). Data analysis in qualitative research. Indian Journal of Continuing Nursing Education, 20(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJCN.IJCN_1_19

Reinhold, S., Holzberger, D., & Seidel, T. (2018). Encouraging a career in science: A research review of secondary schools’ effects on students’ STEM orientation. Studies in Science Education, 54(1), 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2018.1442900

Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.108 0/00461520.2011.587723

Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2022a). Interest development, self-related information processing, and practice. Theory into Practice, 61(1), 23- 34 https://doi.org/10.1080/00 405841.2021.1932159

Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2022b). Interest: A unique affective and cognitive motivational variable that develops. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 8). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2021.12.004

Renninger, K. A., & Su, S. (2012). Interest and its development. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 167–187). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0011

Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.02.003

Rüschenpöhler, L., & Markic, S. (2019). Self-concept research in science and technology education–theoretical foundation, measurement instruments, and main findings. Studies in Science Education, 55(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1645533

Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1 016619705184

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2010). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications (3th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.

Silvia, P. J., & Kashdan, T. B. (2021). Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. In C. R. Snyder, S. J. Lopez, L. M. Edwards, & S. C. Marques (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology (3rd ed., pp. 482–492). Oxford University Press.

Stuckey, M., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of 'relevance' in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 1(49), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463

Untarti, R. (2015). Efektifitas Problem Based Learning (PBL) terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Statistika Inferensia. AlphaMath Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1).

van den Hurk, A., Meelissen, M., & van Langen, A. (2019). Interventions in education to prevent STEM pipeline leakage. International Journal of Science Education, 41(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1540897

Wahba, M. (2007). The Gifted and Talented: Identification Criteria and Their Education. Alexandria: Dar Alwafa' for Printing and Publication World.

Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Unstructured interviews. In B. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social re-search methods to questions in information and library science (pp.222-231). Libraries Unlimited.