Volume 16 (2025) Download Cover Page

A Framework for Developing Interactive Animated E-Books: A Thematic Analysis-Based Study

Article Number: e2025244  |  Available Online: June 2025  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.16.244

Asma A. Sayed , Terry Lucas

Abstract

Background/purpose. This study explores the development and implementation of interactive animated e-books as a transformative digital learning tool. It analyzes their pedagogical and cognitive effects on learner participation and understanding. The study is oriented towards how multimedia integration, interactive storytelling, and adaptive learning principles create superior online learning experiences and what are the most important issues and design principles necessary to apply them.

Materials/methods. This study employed a qualitative methodology through thematic analysis of semi-structured expert interviews with digital education experts, multimedia designers, and educators. The study also conducted a systematic analysis of perspectives about design, usability, educational value, and implementation of interactive animated e-books across different learning contexts.

Results. Show that game-like e-books facilitate learning and student participation through gamification, real-time feedback, and customized learning tracks. Important design factors, such as visual design (color palettes, typefaces, motion design), were seen to trigger attention and recall. Yet critical implementation issues were also realized through high development costs, technological limits, insufficient teacher training, and a need for culturally sensitive design.

Conclusion. Interactive animated e-books offer strong pedagogical value in digital education. Their success depends on design frameworks focused on interactivity, user experience, and adaptive learning. Wider adoption requires affordable development, educator training, and AI-driven personalization. Future studies should assess long-term impact and accessibility in diverse, low-resource contexts.

Keywords: Interactive animated e-books, digital learning, learner engagement, cognitive development, adaptive learning, gamification.

References

Abdinejad, M., Ferrag, C., Qorbani, H. S., & Dalili, S. (2021). Developing a simple and cost-effective markerless augmented reality tool for chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1783–1788. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00173.

Abdullah, N., Ghalebandi, S., & Hajar, R. (2015). How do young children engage with mobile apps? Cognitive, psychomotor, and affective perspective. Computers & Education, 87, 385-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.005

Adams, R. (2007). Decision and stress: cognition and e-accessibility in the information workplace. Springer Universal Access in the Information Society, 5(4), 363–379. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10209-006-0061-9

Alhazmi, K. (2024). The effect of multimedia on vocabulary learning and retention. World Journal of English Language, 14(6), 390. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n6p390

Alshaya, H., & Oyaid, A. (2017). Designing and Publication of Interactive E-Book for Students of Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University: An Empirical Study. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 41-57. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/36115

Bates, C., Klein, A., Schubert, B., McGee, L., Anderson, N., Dorn, L., … & Ross, R. (2016). E-books and e-book apps: considerations for beginning readers. The Reading Teacher, 70(4), 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1543

Bozkurt, A., Okur, M., & Karadeniz, A. (2016). Use of digital books at academic level: perceptions, attitudes and preferences of post-graduate students. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 663. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3534

Cahyani, A. G., & Setyadi, D. (2023). Development of Instagram Filters in Interactive E-Books Mathematics Learning Build a Flat Side Space. JTMT: Journal Tadris Matematika, 4(02), 158-171.

Cherry, J. E. (2014). Technology integration in education: An examination of technology adoption in teaching and learning by secondary teachers in Minnesota. [PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, USA]. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/162926  

Chong, Y. & Soo, H. (2021). Evaluation of first-year university students’ engagement to enhance student development. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i2.13388

Christ, T., Wang, X. C., Chiu, M. M., & Cho, H. (2019). Kindergartener’s meaning making with multimodal app books: The relations amongst reader characteristics, app book characteristics, and comprehension outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 47, 357–372. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200619300055

Cintamulya, I., & Murtini, I. (2025). Optimization of Critical Thinking by Empowering Collaboration and Communication Skills through Information Literacy-Based E-Books: In STEM integrated Problem-Based Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 151-166.

Çırakoğlu, N., Toksoy, S. E., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2022). Designing, Developing, and Evaluating an Interactive E-Book Based on the Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) Method. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 6(2), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-022-00071-3

Dunn, P. K., Brunton, E. A., & Farrar, M. B. (2022). Your online textbook is ready: a shareable, interactive online textbook in response to COVID-19 lockdowns. International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 53(3), 582-593. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1983051

ElAdl, A. & Al-Musawi, A. (2020). Effects of students attitudes towards using e-books on their self-efficacy and academic motivation. European Journal of Educational Research, volume-9-2020(volume-9-issue-3-july-2020), 1167-1176. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1167

Etta, R., & Kirkorian, H. (2019). Children’s learning from interactive eBooks: Simple irrelevant features are not necessarily worse than relevant ones. Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02733

Faridah, E., Kasih, I., Nugroho, S., & Aji, T. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning model on rhythmic activity courses based on complementary work patterns. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 10(4), 918-934. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2618

Farmer, K. (2021). The Benefits of Using Animation for Learning and Development. https://boldcontentvideo.com/2021/06/29/the-benefits-of-using-animation-for-learning-and-development/

Giacornini, C., Wallis, P., Lylo, H., Haaland, W., Davis, K., & Comden, D. (2013). Exploring E-Textbooks at the University of Washington: What WeLearned and What Is Next. Seattle,WA: University of Washington Press. https://www.danskeforlag.dk/media/1608/033-rapport-fra-uw-information-tech-exploring-etextbooks-at-the-university-of-washington-aug-2013-040315.pdf

Gohar, R. (2017). The impact of a proposed interactive e-book on developing english language skills of kindergarten children. International Journal of Internet Education, 16(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijie.2017.16057

Hadaya, A., & Hanif, M. (2019). The impact of using the interactive e-book on students' learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 709-722.

Hagiwara, A. (2014). Effect of visual support on the processing of multiclausal sentences. Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 455-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541715

Kanellopoulou, C., Kermanidis, K., & Γιαννακουλόπουλος, Α. (2019). The dual-coding and multimedia learning theories: film subtitles as a vocabulary teaching tool. Education Sciences, 9(3), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030210

Kirkorian, H. L., Choi, K., Yoo, S. H., & Etta, R. A. (2022). The impact of touchscreen interactivity on US toddlers’ selective attention and learning from digital media. Journal of Children and Media, 16(2), 188-204. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17482798.2021.1944888

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S. & Lim, W. Y. (2016). Teacher professional development for TPACK-21CL: Effects on teacher ICT integration and student outcomes. Journal of Education Computing Research, 55(2), 172-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116656848

Koola, M. (2016). Methodological issues in cytokine measurement in schizophrenia. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 38(1), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7176.175086

Larson, L. (2015). E‐books and audiobooks. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1371

Lin, H. (2012). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations on vocabulary learning and text comprehension in esp classrooms., 172-176. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2012.000047

López-Escribano, C., Montesino, S., & García-Ortega, V. (2021). The impact of e-book reading on young children’s emergent literacy skills: an analytical review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6510. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126510

Lysaght, R., Roy, M., Rendall, J., Krupa, T., Ball, L., & Davis, J. (2018). Unpacking the foundational dimensions of work integration social enterprise. Social Enterprise Journal, 14(1), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-11-2017-0061

Mayer, R. (1999). Research-based principles for the design of instructional messages. Document Design, 1(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1075/dd.1.1.02may

Mayer, R. & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00018-4

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87-99. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1013184611077

Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: the role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358-368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358

Muir, L. & Hawes, G. (2013). The case for e-book literacy: undergraduate students' experience with e-books for course work. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(3), 260-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.01.002

Obeso, M., Hernández‐Linares, R., Fernández, M., & Bedia, A. (2020). Knowledge management processes and organizational performance: the mediating role of organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1859-1880. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-10-2019-0553

Özbay, İ. & Ugurelli, Y. (2023). Changing children’s literature in the digital age: digital books. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 11(1), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.11n.1p.68

Rodriguez, J., Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S., Watts, F., & Nardo, J. (2024). Self-reported limitations in chemistry education research: providing specific and contextualized limitations supports researchers and practitioners. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(7), 2602-2607. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00217

Rojas-Murillo, S., & Pennathur, P. R. (2019). Selection of key visual cues in real and virtual environments for assembly tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 74, 102871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102871

Roskos, K., Burstein, K., Shang, Y., & Gray, E. (2014). Young children’s engagement with e-books at school. Sage Open, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013517244

Rustika, P., & Permana, N. (2022). Annibuku: interactive e-book to measure problem-solving ability in the digital era. International Conference on Research and Development (Icorad), 1(2), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.47841/icorad.v1i2.37

Rvachew, S., Rees, K., Carolan, E., & Nadig, A. (2017). Improving emergent literacy with school-based shared reading: Paper versus ebooks. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 12, 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.01.002

Salsberg, A. (2019). The 12 principles of animation. Lesley University. https://lesley.edu/article/the-12-principles-of-animation

Strouse, G., & Ganea, P. (2017). Parent–toddler behavior and language differ when reading electronic and print picture books. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00677

Turčić, M. (2021). Why do we digitize books instead of knowledge? Acta Graphica Journal for Printing Science and Graphic Communications, 30(1), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.25027/agj2017.28.v30i1.200

Turner, K., Hicks, T., & Zucker, L. (2019). Connected reading: a framework for understanding how adolescents encounter, evaluate, and engage with texts in the digital age. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(2), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.271

Wen, C., Huang, C., Chang, P., Yang, T., You, H., Ning, H., … & Tsao, K. (2022). Application of the electronic book to promote self-directed learning in medical technologist continuing education: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03724-w

Whitelegg, E., Scanlon, E., & Hatzipanagos, S. (2011). Multimedia motion: motivating learners. Research in Learning Technology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v5i1.10554

Xia, H., Li, J., Weng, J., Zhang, Z., & Gao, Y. (2021). Collaborative knowledge sharing in global distributed teams: antecedents of innovation performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(10), 2523-2539. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-10-2020-0763

Xu, Y., Yau, J., & Reich, S. (2020). Press, swipe and read: do interactive features facilitate engagement and learning with e‐books? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12480

Ye, X. D., Chang, Y. H., & Lai, C. L. (2019). An interactive problem-posing guiding approach to bridging and facilitating pre-and in-class learning for flipped classrooms. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1075-1092. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495651