Abstract

Conclusion. The study found that the students' writing anxiety and emotion did not significantly change their paragraph writing skills after exposure to OPRT. These imply that the students' writing anxiety and emotions with the use of online peer feedback did not change before and after the paragraph writing skills with the use of OPRT. The study found that the students' writing anxiety entry level on the anxiety writing, the pre-attitude was high, but it became low in the post-attitude. This means the respondents did not gain a more positive attitude toward writing. On the use of online peer feedback, the students' entry level of attitude was high for both pre-attitude and post-attitude. This implies that the students are equipped with a positive attitude towards using online peer feedback.

Keywords: Peer-review, Facebook, Peer-review technique, Writing Skills, university students

Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the foreign language classroom: A pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools. Education Research International, 2023(1), 4253331. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331

Al-Shehri, M. (2020). Social media as a tool for collaborative learning: The case of Facebook in writing instruction. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106125

Baker, K. M. (2016). Peer review as a strategy for improving students’ writing process. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416654794

Buchanan, M., McKeown, J., & Noyes, M. (2013). The impact of peer feedback and reflection on writing in higher education. Journal of Writing Research, 5(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.05.01.02

Chen, W., Liu, D., & Lin, C. (2023). Collaborative peer feedback in L2 writing: Affective, behavioral, cognitive, and social engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1078141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078141

Francis, R., & Shannon, S. J. (2013). Engaging with blended learning to improve students’ learning outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2013.766679

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable operations and computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Hamadi, M., El-Den, J., Azam, S., & Sriratanaviriyakul, N. (2022). Integrating social media as cooperative learning tool in higher education classrooms: An empirical study. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(6), 3722-3731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.12.007

Hohenstein, J., Kizilcec, R. F., DiFranzo, D., Aghajari, Z., Mieczkowski, H., Levy, K.,Naaman, M. , Hancock, J., & Jung, M. F. (2023). Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 5487. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30938-9

Korous, K. M., Causadias, J. M., Bradley, R. H., Luthar, S. S., & Levy, R. (2022). A systematic overview of meta-analyses on socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, and achievement: The need to focus on specific pathways. Psychological reports, 125(1), 55–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120984127

Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2023). Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032

Law, S., & Baer, A. (2020). Using technology and structured peer reviews to enhance students’ writing. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417740994

Li, J., & Mak, L. (2022). The effects of using an online collaboration tool on college students’ learning of academic writing skills. System, 105, 102712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102712

Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 605-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323

Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Babaee, M., Ashrafi, H., & Biemans, H. J. (2023). Gender differences in students’ argumentative essay writing, peer review performance and uptake in online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6302–6316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887

Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.005 

Seals, D. R. (2023). Publishing particulars: Part 3. General writing tips, editing, and responding to peer review. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 324(3), R409-R424. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00270.2022

Shang, H. F. (2022). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601  

Teng, M. F., Qin, C., & Wang, C. (2022). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and learning, 17(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09278-4 

Topping, K. J. (2010). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 49(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840903453998

Tseng, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). The effects of peer feedback on writing anxiety and writing performance: A case study in a university setting. Computers & Education, 71, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.016

Van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R. J. (2017). Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider. Educational Research Review, 20, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003