Exploring Thai Pre-service Teachers' Responding Patterns and Pragmatic Strategies in the Impromptu Q&A Oral Presentation Abilities of the Post-Presentation

Exploring Thai Pre-service Teachers' Responding Patterns and Pragmatic Strategies in the Impromptu Q&A Oral Presentation Abilities of the Post-Presentation

Article Number: e2025095 | Published Online: March 2025 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.15.95

Arnantawut Tiang-uan

Full text PDF | 256 | 138

Abstract

Background/purpose. Effective impromptu communication skills are crucial for pre-service teachers, particularly in handling spontaneous question-and-answer (Q&A) sessions following academic presentations. However, there is limited research examining how Thai pre-service teachers navigate these challenging interactions while balancing professional communication standards with cultural norms. This study aimed to investigate the responding patterns, pragmatic strategies, and gesture use in Q&A sessions, as well as identify perceived challenges faced by Thai pre-service teachers during impromptu Q&A sessions following their academic presentations.

Materials/methods. The study employed a mixed-methods approach, and the participants were 75 second-year English major pre-service teachers at a public university in Thailand. Data was collected over 16 weeks using observation checklists, structured field notes, and questionnaires. The data were analyzed using both qualitative thematic analysis and quantitative statistical methods.

Results. The findings revealed that there was significant improvement in acknowledgment strategies between Week 8 and Week 16 (M = 1.27 to M = 2.13, p < .001). Participants effectively utilized both direct responses (68.4%) and cultural elements, with Thai politeness markers appearing (94.7%). Gesture analysis showed systematic use of emphatic (42.3%), illustrative (31.7%), and regulative gestures (26%), with emphatic gestures demonstrating highest effectiveness (M = 4.2). Perceived challenges clustered into four categories: linguistic challenges, cognitive processing, affective factors, and cultural considerations, with mental translation emerging as the most significant challenge (M = 4.2).

Conclusion. The study provides recommendations for developing culturally sensitive teacher training programs that address both technical proficiency and cultural appropriateness in impromptu communication skills.

Keywords: Pre-service teachers, impromptu Q&A, pragmatic strategies, oral abilities, presentation skills

References

Alisoy, H., & Oglu, H. (2024). Navigating impromptu speaking: Strategies for successful spontaneous conversations. Journal of Interdisciplinary Science, 2(1), 1-8. http://eprints.umsida.ac.id/13250/

Arya, T. (2022). Exploring discourse marker use in Thai university students’ conversations. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 13(1), 247- 267. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/237854/162854

Best, J. W. (1977). Research in Education. (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burgoon, J. K., Birk, T., & Pfau, M. (1990). Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Human Communication Research, Human Communication Research 17(1), 140–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00229.x

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Deda, N. (2013). The role of Pragmatics in English Language Teaching. Pragmatic Competence. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(4), 63-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2012.v2n4p63

Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford University Press.

Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Ellederová, E. (2023). Rhetorical strategies used by information Technology students in In-Class presentations. IAFOR Journal of Education, 11(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.11.1.07

Hanifa, R., & Yusra, S. R. (2018). Insight on Delivering Oral Presentation: Preparations, Problems, and Solutions. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 4(4). 318–325. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.4.4.318-325

Inpeng, S., & Nomnian, S. (2022). Facebook as a Promotional Took for Learner Autonomy: Thai Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Voices. TEFLIN Journal, 33(2), 292-390. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v33i2/292-309

Karanjakwut, C. (2018). An Investigation of Linguistic and Localised Features of Thai in English Writing on Facebook Closed Group. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.6p.1

Konchiab, S., & Munpanya, P. (2021). Investigating Thai EFL undergraduates’ oral presentation performances and experiences, using teacher and student self-assessments. Thai TESOL journal, 34(1). 96-117. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1304645

Lacsina, N. E. H. (2020). Teacher feedback: impact on students’ impromptu speech. Hawaii Journal of Humanities, 1(1) 125-146. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14131/676

Lumettu, A., & Runtuwene, T. L. (2018). Developing the students’ English speaking ability through impromptu speaking method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012035

Mardiningrum, A., & Ramadhani, D. R. (2022). Classroom oral presentation: Students' challenges and how they cope. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra, 6(1), 103-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v6i1.28487

McNeill, D. (2008). Gesture and Thought. University of Chicago Press.

Mergler, A. G., & Spooner-Lane, R. (2012). What pre-service teachers need to know to be effective at values-based education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(8), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n8.5

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Mhuentoei, R. (2023). Public speaking anxiety of Thai undergraduates comparing online presentation and onsite presentation. New English Teacher. 17(1). 1-28. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/newEnglishTeacher/article/view/5963/3636

Mohamad, A. R., Fakhruddin, W. F. W. W., & Sazalli N. A. H. (2023). Investigating speaking anxiety among pre-service ESL teachers in oral presentation. European Proceedings of Educational Sciences 2023. International Conference of Research on Language Education. 424-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epes.23097.38

Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2016). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Routledge.

Mortaji, L. E. (2018). Effects of sustained impromptu speaking and goal setting on public speaking competency development: A case study of EFL college students in Morocco. English Language Teaching, 11(2), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n2p82

Phu-Ngamthong, T. (2023). The Effects of Project-based Drama Approach via Blended Learning Environment on Thai EFL Undergraduated Student’s Speaking Skills. [MA Thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. https://doi.org/10.58837/chula.the.2020.188

Rumpanpetch, T. (2017). Thai secondary school teachers’ perception of English oral presentation techniques and abilities. Proceedings of the European Conference on Language Learning 2017. The International Academic Forum. https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/ecll2017/ECLL2017_37336.pdf

Tipmontree, S., & Tasanameelarp, A., (2021). Using role playing activities to improve Thai EFL students’ oral English communication skills. International Journal of Business and Society, 21(3), 1215–1225. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3345.2020

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

► Educational Process International Journal has changed to publish in article number order instead of in page range order beginning with Volume 14 (2025).