Volume 15 (2025) - In progress Download Cover Page

Servant Leadership and Job Satisfaction in Higher Education: Examining The Antecedent Effects of Motivation to Serve and The Complementary Mediation of Trust

Article Number: e2025091  |  Published Online: March 2025  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2025.15.91

Lamijan , Nurul Ulfatin , Syamsul Hadi , Sultoni , Zummy Anselmus Dami

Abstract

Background/purpose. Three reasons were found that stimulated this study to be carried out: 1) motivation to serve is categorized as a concept that is not adequately articulated; 2) there are inconsistencies in the placement of trust as an outcome of servant leadership or as a predictor or combining trust and servant leadership; and 3) the inconsistency of servant leadership's direct and indirect influence on job satisfaction opens opportunities for current studies to place trust as a mediator between these two variables. The study aimed to examine the role of the antecedent of motivation to serve on servant leadership and investigate the mediating effects of trust in the relationship between servant leadership and job satisfaction.

Materials/methods. This study used a cross-sectional design with an observational design that is useful for studying the characteristics of current study participants. The respondents of this study were lecturers at 30 Christian higher education in Indonesia, with a total of 140 respondents. This study used a quantitative method, and the data was analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling.

Results. This scale does not indicate any problems with convergent validity. All values of composite reliability, Cronbach's alpha, and rho_A above 0.7, and specifically values rho_A between CA and CR are reasonable indications of reliability. There is no discriminant validity issue for this measurement model because HTMT values are less than the 0.90 threshold value. The results of the analysis show that hypotheses 1 - 4 are accepted (direct) and hypothesis 5 is accepted (indirect) because the t-value is greater than or equal to 1.645.

Conclusion. This study has demonstrated the contribution of the antecedent role of motivation to serve in servant leadership. Servant leadership positively influences job satisfaction and trust, and trust positively influences job satisfaction. Regarding mediation, trust is the complementary mediating effect of servant leadership on job satisfaction.

Keywords: Servant leadership, job satisfaction, motivation to serve, trust, higher education

References

Aboramadan, M., Dahleez, K., & Hamad, M. (2020a). Servant leadership and academics ’ engagement in higher education: Mediation analysis. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 00(00), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2020.1774036

Aboramadan, M., Dahleez, K., & Hamad, M. H. (2020b). Servant leadership and academics outcomes in higher education: the role of job satisfaction. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(3), 562–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-11-2019-1923

Albert, C., Davia, M. A., & Legazpe, N. (2016). Job satisfaction amongst academics: The role of research productivity. Studies in Higher Education, 43(8), 1362–1377. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1255937

Alonderiene, R., & Majauskaite, M. (2016). Leadership style and job satisfaction in higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 140–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2014-0106

Amah, O. (2015). Servant leadership relationship with leader-member exchange: The moderating role of motivation-to-serve and motivation-to-lead. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJMESS), 4(3), 108–127. http://www.ijmess.com/volumes/volume-IV-2015/issue-III-10-2015/full-2.pdf

Amah, O. E. (2018). Determining the antecedents and outcomes of servant leadership. Journal of General Management, 43(3), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307017749634

Amini, A., &, & Kemal, I. (2021). The effect of trust and job satisfaction on citizenship organizational behavior in high school. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 1348–1357. https://doi.org/10.35445/ALISHLAH.V13I2.655

Arifin, I., Juharyanto, Mustiningsih & Taufiq, A. (2018). Islamic crash course as a leadership strategy of school principals in strengthening school organizational culture. SAGE Open, 8(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018799849

Aronson, E. (1997). The theory of cognitive vissonance: The evolution and vicissitudes of an idea. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 20–35). Blackwell Publishing. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-97266-001

Bafadal, I., Atmoko, A., Sunandar, A., Arjanto, P., & Soares, M.I. da C. (2024). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Bafadal`s leadership morality questionnaire in Indonesian context. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies13(1), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2024-0014

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

Birgisdóttir, B.D., Gunnarsdóttir, S., & Candi, M. (2024). Exploring relationships among servant leadership, role clarity and creative self-efficacy. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2022-0555

Blustein, D. L. (2011). A relational theory of working. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.10.004 

Byrne, M., Chughtai, A. A., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2012). Job satisfaction among accounting and finance academics: empirical evidence from Irish higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(2), 153–167.

Casimir, G., Waldman, D. A., Bartram, T., & Yang, S. (2016). Trust and the relationship between leadership and follower performance: Opening the Black Box in Australia and China: Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(3), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190601200305

Chan, S. C. H., & Mak, W. M. (2014). The impact of servant leadership and subordinates’ organizational tenure on trust in leader and attitudes. Personnel Review, 43(2), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2011-0125

Dahleez, K. A., Aboramadan, M., & Bansal, A. (2021). Servant leadership and affective commitment: The role of psychological ownership and person–organization fit. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(2), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2020-2105/FULL/XML

Dahleez, K., & Aboramadan, M. (2022). Servant leadership and job satisfaction in higher education: The mediating roles of organizational justice and organizational trust. International Journal of Leadership in Education. Latest Article. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2022.2052753

Dami, Z.A., Imron, A., Burhanuddin, B., & Supriyanto, A. (2022). Servant leadership and job satisfaction: The mediating role of trust and leader-member exchange. Frontiers in Education, 7:1036668. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1036668

Dasrimin, H., Bafadal, I., Arifin, I., Maisyaroh & Dami, Z. A. (2023). Spirituality leader qualities in Catholic schools in Malang, Indonesia: Teacher and student character strengthened. Issues in Educational Research, 33(4), 1342-1361. http://www.iier.org.au/iier33/dasrimin.pdf

De Cremer, D. (2003). Why inconsistent leadership is regarded as procedurally unfair: The importance of social self-esteem concerns. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.162 

Du Plessis, M., Wakelin, Z., & Nel, P. (2015). The influence of emotional intelligence and trust on servant leadership. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 41(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v41i1.1133

Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 61–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02484.x

Esen, M., Bellibas, M. S., & Gumus, S. (2018). The evolution of leadership research in higher education for two decades (1995-2014): A Bibliometric and Content Analysis. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1508753

Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

Fonataba, J. R. (2016). Analisis pengaruh kepemimpinan pelayan dan lingkungan pelayanan terhadap motivasi melayani dan komitmen pelayanan. Jurnal Riset Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 4(2), 159-174. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jrbm/article/view/12576/12148

Gagné, M., & Forest, J. (2008). The Study of Compensation systems through the lens of self-determination theory: Reconciling 35 years of debate. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0012757

Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New Jersey: Paulist Press.

Ghasemy, M., Erfanian, M., & Gaskin, J.E. (2021). Affective events theory as a theoretical lens for improving the working environment of academics in developing economies", Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(1), 300-324. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2020-0030

Gil, A.J., Bittencourt Gonzalez Mosegui, G., Zenezi Moreira, R., & Eguizabal, M.J. (2023). The moderating role of employee proactive behaviour in the relationship between servant leadership and job satisfaction.  International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-01-2023-3592

Hai, T. N., & Van, Q. N. (2021). Servant leadership styles: A theoretical approach. Emerging Science Journal, 5(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01273

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 566–584.

Hajjaj, K.  G.  (2014).  Relationship between servant leadership style and intent to stay among the employees in the municipality of Gaza. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(7), 95-101.  https://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_5_No_7_June_2014/10.pdf

Ilkhanizadeh, S., & Karatepe, O. M. (2018). Does trust in organization mediate the influence of servant leadership on satisfaction outcomes among flight attendants? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(12), 3555–3573. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM- 09-2017-0586 

Juharyanto, J., Sultoni, S., Arifin, I., Bafadal, I., Nurabadi, A., & Hardika, H. (2020). Gethok tular” as the leadership strategy of school principals to strengthen multi-stakeholder forum role in improving the quality of one-roof schools in remote areas in Indonesia. Sage Open, 10(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020924374

Kiker, D. S., Callahan, J. S., & Kiker, M. B.  (2019). Exploring the boundaries of servant leadership: A meta-analysis of the main and moderating effects of servant leadership on behavioral and affective outcomes. Journal of Managerial Issues, 31(2), 172–97.

Lowe, J. (1998). Trust: the invaluable asset. In Spears, L.C. (Ed.), Insights on leadership: service, stewardship, spirit, and servant-leadership (p. 398). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Insights+on+Leadership%3A+Service%2C+Stewardship%2C+Spirit%2C+and+Servant+Leadership-p-9780471176343

Latif, K. F., & Marimon, F. (2019). Development and validation of servant leadership scale in Spanish higher education. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 40(4), 499–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2019-0041

Latif, K. F., Machuca, M. M., Marimon, F., & Sahibzada, U. F. (2021). Servant leadership, career, and life satisfaction in higher education: A cross-country study of Spain, China, and Pakistan. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16(3), 1221–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11482-019-09809-X

Liden, R. C., Panaccio, A., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., & Sandy, J. (2014). Oxford handbooks online servant leadership: Antecedents, processes, and outcomes (Issue August 2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.013.018

Machado-Taylor, M.d.L., White, K., & Gouveia, O. (2014). Job satisfaction of academics: Does gender matter? higher education policy, 27, 363–384.

Maisyaroh, Juharyanto, Bafadal, I., Wiyono, B. B., Adha, M. A., Saputra, B. R. & Ariyanti, N. S. (2020). Implementation of principal instructional leadership in facilitating learning independency policy on 4.0 industrial era orientation in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd Early Childhood and Primary Childhood Education (ECPE 2020), 206-211. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201112.037

McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect - and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation In organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/256727

Mccann, J. T., Graves, D., & Cox, L. (2014). Servant leadership, employee satisfaction, and organizational performance in rural community hospitals. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(10), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v9n10p28

Memon, M.A., Cheah, J-H., Ting, T.R.H., & Chuah, F. (2018). Mediation analysis issues and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 2(1), i–ix. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.2(1)01

Mooradian, T., Renzl, B., & Matzler, K. (2006). Who trusts? personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Management Learning, 37(4), 523–540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507606073424

Ng, K.-Y., Koh, C., & Goh, H.-C. (2008). The heart of the servant leader: Leader’s motivation-to-serve and its impact on LMX and subordinates’ extra-role behavior. In G. B. Graen, & J. A. Graen (Eds.). Knowledgedriven corporation-complex creative destruction (pp. 125–144). Information Age. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307017749634

Ng, K.-Y., & Koh, C. S.-K. (2010). Motivation to serve: Understanding the heart of the servant-leader and servant leadership behaviours. Servant Leadership : Developments in Theory and Research.

Page, D. & Wong, T. P. (2000). A conceptual framework for measuring servant leadership. In 282 Adjibolosoo, S. (ed.) The Human Factor in Shaping the Course of History and Development (pp. 69–97). University Press of America.

Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617

Schermerhorn, J.R., Hunt, J.G., Osborn, R.N., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2010). Organizational behavior. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Senjaya, S., & Pekerti, A. (2010). Servant leadership as antecedent of trust in organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(7), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731011079673

Sendjaya, S., Eva, N., Butar, I.B., Robin, M., & Castles, S. (2019). SLBS-6: validation of a short form of the servant leadership behavior scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 941-956.

Singh, S., & Ryhal, P. C. (2021). How does servant leadership behaviour affect job satisfaction? A study on Indian academia. FIIB Business Review, 10(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714520968697

Stafford, L. (2014). Social exchange theories: Calculating the rewards and costs of personal relationships. In Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 377–390). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329529.n28

Ukeni, I. G., Harrington, S., Reynolds, & Kae. (2019). UWS academic portal motivation to serve: A quantitative examination of servant leadership in Turbulent times. https://research-portal.uws.ac.uk/en/publications/motivation-to-serve-a-quantitative-examination-of-servant-leaders

Van Dierendonck, D., Stam, D., Boersma, P., de Windt, N., & Alkema, J. (2014). Same difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking servant leadership and transformational leadership to follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2013.11.014

Westbrook, K.W., & Peterson, R.M. (2022). Servant leadership effects on salesperson self-efficacy, performance, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing29(2), 153-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2022.2068820

Weiss, H.M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). “Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work”, in Staw, B.M. and Cummings, L.L. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, Elsevier Science/JAI Press, Vol. 18.

Winston, B., & Fields, D. (2015). Seeking and measuring the essential behaviors of servant leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 36(4), 413-434. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2013-0135.

Zhao, X., Lynch Jr., J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1086/651257

Zhu, W., Newman, A., Miao, Q., & Hooke, A. (2013). Revisiting the mediating role of trust in transformational leadership effects: Do different types of trust make a difference? The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2012.08.004

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

► Educational Process International Journal has changed to publish in article number order instead of in page range order beginning with Volume 14 (2025).