How to Publish Research Papers in SCOPUS-Indexed General and Educational Journals

Background/purpose. This study explores the methodologies for publishing research papers in SCOPUS-indexed journals, targeting academic professionals, including educators and researchers, to enhance their recognition and visibility within educational contexts. It investigates the critical processes—manuscript writing, journal selection, submission preparation, and peer review—aiming to equip educators with strategies to contribute meaningfully to educational research and policy. Grounded in the need to strengthen academic publishing skills among educational professionals, this research seeks to inform teacher training, research education, and institutional policies, ultimately improving scholarly impact and educational innovation.

Materials/Methods. The study employs a qualitative analysis, drawing on a comprehensive review of existing literature, SCOPUS indexing criteria, and best practices in academic publishing. Data were gathered from guidelines, ethical standards, and peer-reviewed publications in SCOPUS journals, focusing on educational and pedagogical research. The analysis includes case studies of successful publication strategies and interviews with experienced educational researchers, providing insights into challenges and techniques for navigating the publishing process effectively.

Results. The findings highlight key strategies for academic professionals to increase acceptance rates in SCOPUS-indexed journals, such as adhering to ethical standards (e.g., avoiding plagiarism), addressing reviewer feedback, and selecting appropriate journals based on research focus. These practices significantly enhance educators’ scholarly productivity, foster research-informed teaching, and elevate the quality of educational research. The study underscores the importance of professional development in research skills for educators, offering a framework to bridge gaps in academic publishing knowledge within educational institutions.

Conclusion. This research demonstrates that mastering SCOPUS-indexed publication methodologies can empower academic professionals, particularly educators, to advance their research profiles and contribute to educational innovation. The study offers actionable insights for educational policymakers and training programs to integrate research skills into teacher education curricula by providing systematic guidelines for manuscript preparation, ethical conduct, and reviewer engagement. These findings advocate for institutional support and policy reforms to promote scholarly publishing, enhancing educational quality and global academic visibility in the education sector.

Keywords: Academic publishing in education, SCOPUS-indexed journals, teacher research skills, educational policy, teacher training

References

Abrizah, A., Zainab, A. N., Edzan, N. N., & Koh, A. P. (2013). Citation performance of Malaysian scholarly journals in the Web of Science, 2006–2010. Serials Review, 39(1), 47–55.

Basu, A. (2010). Does a country’s scientific productivity depend critically on the number of country journals indexed? Scientometrics, 82(3), 507–516.

Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L. (2013). Macro-indicators of citation impacts of six prolific countries: Incites data and the statistical significance of trends. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e56768.

Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., Walch-Solimena, C., & Ettl, C. (2011). Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), 537–546.

Cole, S., & Phelan, T. (1999). The scientific productivity of nations. Minerva, 37(1), 1–23.

Erfanmanesh, M. (2017). Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus. Collection Building. doi:10.1108/CB-02-2017-0007.

Erfanmanesh, M., & Nojavan, F. (2016). Qualitative and quantitative status and international visibility of Iranian journals indexed in journal citation reports. Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management, 32(1), 51–73.

He, Z. L., Geng, X. S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2009). Research collaboration and research output: A longitudinal study of 65 biomedical scientists in a New Zealand university. Research Policy, 38(2), 306–317.

King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430, 311–331.

Luna-Morales, M. E., Collazo-Reyes, F., Russell, J. M., & Pérez-Angón, M. Á. (2009). Early patterns of scientific production by Mexican researchers in mainstream journals, 1900–1950. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21065

Mabe, M., & Amin, M. (2001). Growth dynamics of scholarly and scientific journals. Scientometrics, 51(1), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010520913124

Maflahi, N., & Thelwall, M. (2021). Domestic researchers with longer careers generate a higher average citation impact, but it does not increase over time. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(2), 560–587. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00132

Manzer, B. M. (1977). The abstract journal, 1790–1920: Origin, development and diffusion. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press.

Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2021). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 871–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4

Molinero, C. M. (1992). Operational research: From war to community. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 26(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(92)90011-S

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Nakayama, T., Hirai, N., Yamazaki, S., & Naito, M. (2005). Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(2), 237–242. PubMed: 15858627

Nejati, A., & Jenab, S. M. H. (2010). A two-dimensional approach to evaluate the scientific production of countries (Case study: The basic sciences). Scientometrics, 84(2), 357–364.

Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421–432.

Smith, M. J., Weinberger, C., Bruna, E. M., & Allesina, S. (2014). The scientific impact of nations: Journal placement and citation performance. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e109195.

Sweileh, W. M., Al-Jabi, S. W., Zyoud, S. E. H., Shraim, N. Y., Anayah, F. M., & AbuTaha, A. S. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of global publications in medication adherence (1900–2017). International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 27(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12471

Tay, A., Martín-Martín, A., & Hug, S. E. (2021). Goodbye, Microsoft Academic–hello, open research infrastructure? Impact of Social Sciences Blog. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/111325/1/impactofsocialsciences_2021_05_27_goodbye_microsoft_academic_hello.pdf

Teschke, O., Wegner, B., & Werner, D. (2011). Glimpses into the history of Zentralblatt MATH. In O. Teschke, B. Wegner, & D. Werner (Eds.), 80 Years of Zentralblatt MATH (pp. 1–16). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21172-0_1

Thelwall, M. (2016). The precision of the arithmetic mean, geometric mean, and percentiles for citation data: An experimental simulation modeling approach. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.001

Thelwall, M. (2018). Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006

Vinkler, P. (2010). The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

Wallace, M. L., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2009). Modeling a century of citation distributions. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.010

Waltman, L., Calero-Medina, C., Kosten, J., Noyons, E. C. M., Tijssen, R. J. W., Van Eck, N. J., & Wouters, P. (2012). The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2419–2432.

Elsevier. (2024). Scopus content overview. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus (Reflects the 28,000 journals and 7,000 publishers data from 2024 updates.)

Scopus Blog. (2023, February 14). Scopus now includes 90 million+ content records!. https://blog.scopus.com

Announcement

EDUPIJ Citation Metrics

EDUPIJ News!

► Educational Process International Journal has changed to publish in article number order instead of in page range order beginning with Volume 14 (2025).