Volume 11 Issue 4 (2022)

How School Climate Affects Teachers' Individual Innovativeness: The Mediating Role of Teacher Autonomy

pp. 69-91  |  Published Online: December 2022  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2022.114.4

Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir, Neslihan Cakalci

Abstract

Background/purpose – The continuity of society is ensured through schools where educational activities are formally conducted. There exists a wide range of tasks that are assigned to educational systems and schools, and three concepts play a critical role for the successful completion of those tasks: school climate, individual innovativeness, and teacher autonomy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether teacher autonomy had a mediating role in the relationship between school climate and teachers' individual innovativeness.

Materials/methods – The relational survey model was used in the study, with 617 elementary school teachers selected using simple random sampling. Data were collected using three scales: the School climate scale, the Teacher autonomy scale, and the Individual innovativeness scale. The collected data were analyzed using regression and correlation analyses. In addition, Bootstrap analysis was performed through IBM SPSS v.24.0 (Hayes, 2013) with PROCESS Macro 3 and “Simple Mediation Model 4” used to examine the significance of the mediation effect.

Results – The findings revealed that a positive, moderate, and significant relationship exists between school climate, individual innovativeness, and teacher autonomy. Bootstrap analysis showed that teacher autonomy had a significant mediating effect in the relationship between school climate and individual innovativeness. Furthermore, the Sobel test proved the significant mediating effect of teacher autonomy since the Z value was at the desired level.

Conclusion – It was found that teacher autonomy had a mediating role in the relationship between school climate and teacher innovativeness. Since this is the first study to examine the mediation effect of teacher autonomy on the relationship between teacher innovativeness and school climate, further research is needed with different samples to verify the findings.

Keywords: School climate, individual innovation, teacher autonomy, mediator variable, education and training

References

Acarbay, F. Y. (2006). Kapsamlı okul iklimini değerlendirme ölçeğinin (öğrenci formu) Türkçe dilsel eşdeğerlik güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması [Reliability and validity study of Turkish linguistic equivalence of comprehensive school climate scale (student form)]. [Master’s thesis, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/TezGoster?key=XohQ0H2mJnBfxLPsY8dG4yfQMKLZ-EUt3LAz3w01R8SR3Zk4MlevPcRHU4ABURyr

Ağaoğlu, E., Altinkurt, Y., Yilmaz, K., & Karaköse, T. (2012). Opinions of school administrators and teachers about proficiency of school administrators (in Kütahya). Egitim ve Bilim, 37 (164), 159-175.

Akçay, P., & Sevinç, H. H. (2021). A Study on Perceived Management Styles of School Administrators and Autonomy of Teachers. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 41(2), 1173-1201 https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610121969460

Akdeniz, M. Y. (2020). İnovasyon eğitim programının öğretmenlerin bireysel yenilikçilik davranışlarına etkisi [Effect of innovation education program on individual innovation behavior of teachers]. [Master’s thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/91ece1b415ca4ac81740955654547432/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y

Altuntaş B., Demirdağ S., & Ertem H. Y. (2020). Examination of the Relationship between Management Skills of School Principals and School Climate Perceived by Parents. Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 254-269. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1211635

Amabile, T. M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995

Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C. M., & Peterson, M. F. (2000). The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate. Sage.

Atalay, A. M., (2021). İngilizce Öğretmenlerinin Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri ile Bireysel Yenilikçilik Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. [Investigation on Critical Thinking Tendencies and Individual Innovativeness Levels of English Teachers]. [Master’s thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey]. http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11499/38342

Atik, G., & Güneri, Y. O. (2016). School Climate Survey for Middle School Students: Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Form. Elementary Education Online, 15(1), 91-103. https://dx.doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.42123

Aydın, S. (2019). Öğretmenlerin Görüşlerine Göre Okul Yöneticilerinin Yönetim Süreçlerini Kullanma Becerilerinin Okul İklimine Etkisi (Kocaeli İli Örneği) [The effect of school administrator’s skill of using management on school climate according to the opinions of teachers (Kocaeli province sample)]. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.

Ayık, A., & Ada, Ş. (2009). The relationship between the effectiveness of schools and the school culture which is created in primary schools. Gaziantep University, Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 429-446. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jss/issue/24261/257171?publisher=gantep

Ayral, M., Özdemir, N., Türedi, A., Yılmaz-Fındık, L., Büyükgöze, H., Demirezen, S., Özarslan, H., & Tahirbegi, Y. (2014). The Relationship between Teacher Autonomy and Student Achievement: PISA Sample. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 207-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/jesr.2014.4os12a

Baharuddin, M. F., Masrek, M. N., & Shuhidan, S. M. (2019). Innovative Work Behaviour of School Teachers: A Conceptual Framework. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 5(14), 213-221. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.593851

Bakkal, M. (2019). The Relationship Between the Levels of School Principals Meeting Educational Leadership Standards and Teachers’ School Climate and Motivation Perceptions: Example of Sultanbeyli district. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. İstanbul Aydın University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Bakkal, M., & Radmard, S. (2020). The Relationships among Organizational Climate and Teacher Motivation. Istanbul Aydın University, Journal of Education, 5(2), 163-195.

Balcı, A. (2013). Etkili Okul ve Okul Geliştirme: Kuram Uygulama ve Araştırma. Pegem Akademi.

Banoğlu, K. (2009). İlköğretim Okullarında Görev Yapmakta Olan Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerin Öğrenen Örgüt Algısı [Perception of learning organization of the primary school managers and teachers]. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Yıldız Teknik University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Baron, R. M., & Keny, D. A. (1986). The Mediator-Moderator Distinction in Social Psychology: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Baykal, İ. (2007). İlköğretim Okullarında Örgütsel İklimin Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi [A research on organizational climate of primary schools in terms of some variables]. [Master’s thesis, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=nR-i6hAcaSpe9Ic-HNYTOg&no=bJfga8jwvgFBWcduEBSYDw

Bilir, P. (2005). Gençlik ve Spor Genel Müdürlüğü’nün Örgüt İklimi ve Çalışanların Katılımla İlgili Algılamaları. [The Relationship Between Organizational Climate Employee Perception of Involvement: A Field Study in Youth and Sports General Directorate]. [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation]. Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Blömeke, S., & Klein, P. (2013). When is a School Environment Perceived as Supportive by Beginning Mathematics Teachers? Effects of Leadership, Trust, Autonomy and Appraisal on Teaching Quality. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 1029-1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9424-x

Bodur, E., & Argon, T. (2019). Yenilikçi okul ve örgüt iklimine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Uluslararası Liderlik Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(1), 75-88. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijolt/issue/45248/566931

Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of Leadership Style on Teacher Job Satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662-683. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610121969460

Bütün, Y. (2020). Öğretmen Özerkliğinin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışına Etkisi: Mesleki Benlik Saygısının Aracılık Rolü [The effect of teacher autonomy on organizational citizenship behaviour: The mediating role of vocational esteem]. [Master’s thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, İstanbul, Turkey]. https://openaccess.izu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12436/2381

Buyruk, H., & Akbaş, A. (2021). An Analysis on the Relationship between Teachers’ Occupational Professionalism and their Autonomy. Education and Science, 46(208), 431-451, http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2021.9996

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi.

Çalık, T., & Kurt, T. (2010). Development of the School Climate Scale (SCS). Education and Science, 35(157), 167-180. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/298

Canbolat, Y. (2020). Professional Autonomy of High School Teachers in Turkey: A Retrospective and Prospective Policy Analysis. Education and Science, 45(202), 141-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.7833

Castle, K. (2004). The meaning of autonomy in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 25(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/1090102040250103

Çelikten, M., Şanal, M., & Yeni, Y. (2005). Öğretmenlik Mesleği ve Özellikleri [Teaching Profession and Characteristics]. Erciyes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 1(19), 207-237. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erusosbilder/issue/25118/265225

Çolak, İ. (2016). The relationship between school climate and teacher autonomy (Muğla sample). [Master’s thesis, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=Ccj7gjZP_vxR0yBOLnMj-A&no=pkXYLSe0j4Lm8IAAgpattg

Çolak, İ., & Altınkurt, Y. (2017). The Relationship between School Climate and Teacher Autonomy Behaviors. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 33-71. https://doi.org/10.17762/kuey.v23i1.87

Day, C., Leithwood, K., & Sammons, P. (2008). What We Have Learned, What We Need To Know More About. School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation, 28(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800102

Doğan, M. K. (2010). Öğretmenlerin Okul İklim Algıları İle Kaynaştırmaya İlişkin Tutumları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi [Survey on the Relation Between Class and Branch Teachers in Primary School Teachers’ Perception of School Climate and Their Attitude to Student Mainstreaming] [Master’s thesis, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey]. https://dspace.trakya.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/trakya/2057

Dude, D. J. (2012). Organizational commitment of principals: the effects of job autonomy, empowerment, and distributive justice. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/048f28f84bf39934c44acf5b95527e5e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

Edwards, J. R., & Lamberts, L. S. (2007). Methods for Integrating Moderation and Mediation: A General Analytical Framework using Moderated Path Analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22. https://10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1

Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414845

Erden, A., & Erden, H. (2020). The Relationship Between Individual Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship Characteristics of Teacher Candidates. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(SI), 185-206. https://ijci.wcci-international.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/332

Eren, E., & Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu, H. (2002, May 23-25). Örgüt Yaratıcılığı ve Verimliliğinin Sağlanmasında Örgüt İkliminin Rolü. [Conference presentation]. 10. Ulusal Yönetim Ve Organizasyon Kongresi.

Ertürk, R. (2020, September 16-19). A Conceptual Analysis on Teacher Autonomy [Conference presentation]. Uluslararası Pegem Eğitim Kongresi (IPCEDU - 2020), Antalya, Turkey.

Eryılmaz, A. (2013). Motivation and Amotivation at School: Developing the Scale of Expectations from Teacher About Class Engagement. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education, 13(25), 1-18. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/maeuefd/issue/19398/205951

Eurydice. (2008). Levels of Autonomy and Responsibilities of Teachers in Europe. Eurydice European Unit. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/226260/levels-of-autonomy-and-responsibilities-of-teachers-in-europe/878782/

Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115

Friedman, I. A. (1999). Teacher-Perceived Work Autonomy: The Concept and Its Measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164499591005

Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 335-397. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002335

Gardner, J. W. (1990). Yenilikçi Birey, Zinde Toplum. İlgi.

Garvin, N. M. (2007). Teacher autonomy: Distinguishing perceptions by school cultural characteristics. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/72b9e302ed4d04b0ff8031f9cf93b2f7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step. A Simple Study Guide and Reference (10th ed.). Pearson.

Gündüz, Ş. (2021). Examining the Relationship between Individual Innovativeness and Digital Nativeness Levels of Teachers. Education and Science, 46(205), 261-277. https://doi.org/ 10.15390/EB.2020.9006

Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The Knowledge-Creating School. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.00107

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.

Hoy, W. K., Tarter, J. C., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open Schools/ Healthy Schools: Measuring Organizational Climate. Sage.

Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for The Measurement of Innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4(1), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00597.x

Işık, D. (2020). Ortaöğretimde Çalışan Öğretmenlere Göre Okul İklimi İle Yöneticilerin Eğitimsel Liderlik Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişki [Master’s degree project]. Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey. http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11499/35057

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, And Mixed Approaches. Sage.

Jones, M. F. (2011). An examination of the meanings assigned to principal-teacher interactions and the relationship to school climate. [Master’s thesis, The University of Alabama]. https://ir.ua.edu/handle/123456789/1038

Kahraman, A. (2020). Özel okul öğretmenlerinin eğitim programı okuryazarlığı, epistemolojik inançları ve bireysel yenilikçilik düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examination of private school teachers’ levels of educational program literacy, epistemological beliefs, and individual innovativeness]. [Master’s thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, İstanbul, Turkey]. https://openaccess.izu.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12436/2417

Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three Tiers for Innovation Research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015005001

Karademir, A., & Ören, M. (2020). School Climate: A Comparative Study from the Perspective of Kindergarten Principals and Teachers. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 206-236. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.10m

Karakose, T. (2014). The effects of nepotism, cronyism, and political favoritism on the doctors working in public hospitals. Stud. Ethno-Med. 8(3), 245–250. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09735070.2014.11917640

Karakose, T. (2021). Emergency remote teaching due to COVID-19 pandemic and potential risks for socioeconomically disadvantaged students in higher education. Educational Process: International Journal, 10(3), 53-61. https://dx.doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2021.103.4

Karakose, T., Kocabas, I., & Yesilyurt, H. (2014). A quantitative study of school administrators’ work-life balance and job satisfaction in public schools. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 30(6), 1231-1241. 

Karakose, T., Yirci, R., Basyigit, H., & Kucukcakir, A. (2021). Investigation of associations between the effects of COVID-19 fear on school administrators and nutrition and problematic eating behaviors. Progress in Nutrition, 23(2): e2021187, https://doi.org/10.23751/pn.v23i2.11656

Karakose, T., Yirci, R., Uygun, H., Ozdemir, T.Y. (2016). Relationship between high school students' Facebook addiction and loneliness status. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2419-2429. http://www.iserjournals.com/journals/eurasia/download/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1557a

Karasar, N. (2004). Eğitimde Yeni İletişim Teknolojileri - Internet ve Sanal Yüksek Eğitim. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(4), 117-125. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v3i4/3416.pdf

Karataş, S. (2008). Okul Müdürlerinin Etkililiği ve Okul İklimi (İstanbul Fatih Ve Eminönü İlçeleri Örneği) [School principals efficiency and school environment (Sample of İstanbul Eminönü and Fatih district)]. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. İstanbul Yeditepe University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Karatay, M., Günbey, M., & Taş M. (2020). The Relationship Between Teacher Professionalism and Autonomy. Journal of Munzur University Social Sciences, 9(2), 173-195. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tusbd/issue/59281/789871

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (Vol. 2). Wiley.

Kılıç, H. (2015). İlköğretim branş öğretmenlerinin bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri ve yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri (Denizli ili örneği) [Primary Subject Teachers’ Individual Innovativeness Levels and Lifelong Learning Tendencies (Within Denizli Province)]. [Master’s thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey]. http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11499/2133

Kılıçer, K., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2010). Individual Innovativeness Scale (Is): The Study of Adaptation to Turkish, Validity and Reliability. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, 150-164. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/shw_artcl-451.html

Kırkıç, K. A., & Topal, B. (2019). Investigating Pre-school and Primary School Teachers’ Preferences of Informal Learning Environments and Their Individual Innovativeness Levels. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(20), 1626-1648. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.598991

Koçak, E. (2011). İlköğretim Okullarında Görev Yapan Öğretmenlerin Yetki Devri, Otonomi Ve Hesap Verebilirliklerine İlişkin Algılarının Belirlenmesi [A research on empowerment, autonomy and accountability perception of teachers who work in Turkish elementary schools]. [Master’s thesis, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey]. http://openaccess.ogu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/11684/3282

Korkmaz, M. (2008). A study of relationship between leadership styles on the characteristics of learning organizations in Turkish public schools. Educational Management in Theory and Practice, 53(53), 75-98. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kuey/issue/10344/126715

Lafollette, W. R., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1975). Is Satisfaction Redundant with Organizational Climate? Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance, 13(2), 257-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90049-5

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in Education: Evidence based Inquiry. Pearson.

Memduhoğlu, H. B., & Şeker, G. (2010). Organizational Climate of Primary Schools in the View of Teachers. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 12(1), 1-26. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/92251

Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2015). Reflection as a facilitator of teachers’ innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12052

Murat, M., Aslantaş, H. İ., & Özgan, H. (2006). Assessment of instructors with regard to instructional activities in classrooms. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 26(3), 263-278. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gefad/issue/6752/90804

Nayci, Ö. (2021). The relationship between individual innovativeness characteristics of classroom teachers and their roles and competencies in online education. Kocaeli University Journal of Education, 4(1), 108-122. http://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.900806.

Othman, N. (2016). Exploring the innovative personality characteristics among teachers. International Education Studies, 9(4), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n4p1

Özan, M. B., Polat, H., Gündüzalp, S., & Yaraş, Z. (2015). The SWOT Analysis at the Educational Organizations. Turkish Journal of Educational Studies, 2(1), 1-28. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/turkjes/issue/34173/377841

Özdemir, E., Çepni, S., & İncedere, L. (2020). Determination of Vocational School Students’ School Climate Perceptions. European Journal of Science and Technology, 19, 272-281. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.710552

Özdemir, S., Sezgin, F., Şirin, H., Karip, E., & Erkan, S. (2010). Examining The Variables Predicting Primary School Students’ Perceptions of School Climate. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, 213-224. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/shw_artcl-430.html

Özer, N. (2019). Eğitimin Toplumsal Temelleri. In M. Boydak Özan & T. Y. Özdemir (Eds.), Eğitim Bilimine Giriş. (pp. 85-108). ASOS.

Özkan, M., & Arslantaş, H. İ. (2013). A Study of Scaling with Ranking Judgment Method on Characteristic of Effective Teacher. Trakya University Journal of Social Science, 15(1), 311-330. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/trakyasobed/issue/30217/326212

Öztürk, İ. H. (2012). Teacher’s Role and Autonomy in Instructional Planning: The Case of Secondary School History Teachers with regard to the Preparation and Implementation of Annual Instructional Plans. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 279-291.

Paknadel Çetinkanat, A. C. (1988). Örgütsel İklim ve İş Duyumu. [Doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=9juK9iux233iVMgDZzUicw&no=9juK9iux233iVMgDZzUicw

Pallant, J. (2015). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Pratoom, K., & Savatsomboon, G. (2012). Explaining Factors Affecting Individual Innovation: The Case of Producer Group Members in Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 1063-1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9246-0

Price, H. E. (2012). Principal-teacher interactions: How affective Relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 39-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11417126

Pugahan, A. S., & R. L. H. Roble. (2018). Teachers’ innovativeness and achievements of students in plane trigonometry. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research, 6(10), 26-30. https://www.ijser.in/archives/v6i10/IJSER18275.pdf

Reutter, K. K., & Bigatti, S. M. (2014). Religiosity and Spirituality as Resiliency Resources: Moderation, Mediation, or Moderated Mediation? Journal for The Scientific Study of Religion, 53(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12081

Ritchhart, R. (2004). Creative Teaching in the Shadow of the Standards. Independent School, 63, 32-40.

Sehrawat, J. (2014). Teacher autonomy: Key to teaching success. Bhartiyam International Journal of Research & Education, 4(1), 1-8.

Sobel, M. E. (1982), Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models, Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723

Sparks, D. (2012). The relationship between teacher perceptions of autonomy in the classroom and standards based accountability reform. [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Maryland]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/b0a3660840a17a747cc2cfb9510da1b1/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

Strong, L. E. G., & Yoshida, R. K. (2014). Teachers’ Autonomy in Today’s Educational Climate: Current Perceptions from an Acceptable Instrument. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 50(2), 123-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.880922

Suharyati, H. (2017). Interaction of relationship between job motivation with teacher innovativeness in improving education. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 228-232. https://dx.doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v2i2.291

Şahin, A., & Atbaşı, Z. (2020). Examining the Role of the Teacher in Creating a Positive School Climate. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(3), 672-689. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.742972

Şam, M. (2017). Ergenlerde siber zorba ve mağdur olmanın anne baba tutumları ve okul iklimi ile ilişkisinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between parents attitudes and the school climate of being a cyber-bully and cyber victim in adolescents]. [Master’s thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey]. http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11499/26443

Şenel, T. (2015). İlkokullarda okul iklimi ile okul etkililiği arasındaki ilişki [The Relationship Between Organizational Climate and School Effectiveness in Primary Schools]. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

Şentürken, C. (2018). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin özerklik davranışları ile iş doyumları arasındaki ilişki [The Relationship Between Secondary School Teachers Autonomy Behaviour and Job Satisfaction]. [Master’s thesis, Dumlupınar University, Kütahya, Turkey]. https://openaccess.dpu.edu.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12438/8048/senturken_caner.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

Tabak, A., Erkuş, A., & Meydan, C. H. (2010). The Relationship Between Locus of Control And Innovative Individual Behaviors: Mediating Effect Of Tolerance For Ambiguity And Risk Taking On Innovativeness. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 159-176.

Tableman, B. (2004). School climate and learning. Best Practice Briefs, 31. https://outreach.msu.edu/bpbriefs/issues/brief31.pdf

Taşkıran, A. (2008). Meslek Lisesi Öğrencilerinin Okul İklimi Algıları İle Mesleki Olgunluk Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişki [The relation between the school climate perception and professional ripeness levels for the students of vocational high school]. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Yeditepe University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Tavşanlı, Ö. F., Birgül, K., & Oksal, A. (2016). Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Okul İklimine Yönelik Algılarını Yordayan Değişkenlerin. Journal of Turkish Studies, 11(9), 821-821. https://doi.org/10.7827/TURKISHSTUDIES.9616

Tepe, N., & Yılmaz G. (2020). Toxic Leadership Behaviours of School Administrators As Predictor Of Teachers’ School Climate Perceptions. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi-International Journal of Society Researches 15(25), 3360-3381. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.667320

Tuna, Ö. (2021). Effects of Organizational Culture Types on Individual Innovation. Dogus University Journal, 22(1), 199-218. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/doujournal/issue/66684/1043237

UNESCO. (1996). Learning: The Treasure Within. Report of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century Chaired by Jacques Delors.

Uras, M. (2000). Lise Öğretmenlerinin Örgüt Sağlığının Moral, Yenilikçilik, Özerklik, Uyum ve Problem Çözme Yeterliği Boyutlarına İlişkin Algıları. Pamukkale University, Journal of Education, 7(7), 124-131. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/pauefd/issue/11136/133212

Usma Wilches, J. (2007). Teacher Autonomy: A Critical Review of the Research and Concept beyond Applied Linguistics. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 12(18),245-275. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2550/255020488010.pdf

Üzüm, P., & Karslı, M. D. (2013). Awareness Levels of Classroom Teachers about Teacher Autonomy (An Example of the Province of Izmir). Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 14(3), 79-94. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/inuefd/issue/8710/108761

Welsh, W. N. (2000). The Effects of School Climate on School Disorder. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 567(1), 88-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620056700107

Wu, C.-H., Parker, S. K., & Jong, J. P. J. (2011). Need for Cognition as an Antecedent of Individual Innovation Behavior. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1511-1534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311429862

Yapıcı, İ. Ü., & Kaya S. (2020). Examination Of Individual Innovativeness Levels of Biology Teachers (Case of Diyarbakir). Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(73), 348-362. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esosder/issue/50289/565729

Yaşar, İ. (2020). İlkokul ve ortaokullarda çalışan öğretmenlerin perspektifinden okullarının yenilikçilik düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi [The Evaluation of the Level of the Innovativeness of Schools from the Perspective of the Teachers Working at Elementary and Secondary Schools]. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Harran University, Şanlıurfa, Turkey.

Yaylacı, A. F. (2013). Approach Problem for Teachers to Develop Themselves. Usak University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(SI), 25-40. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/usaksosbil/issue/21642/232633

Yenice, N., & Alpak Tunç, G. (2019). An Investigation of Pre-Service Teachers’ Lifelong Learning Tendencies and Their Individual Innovativeness Levels. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(2), 753-765. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2716

Yenice, N., & Yavaşoğlu, N. (2018). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri ile bireysel yaratıcılıkları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 14(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/doi:10.17244/eku.334590

Yılmaz, K., & Altınkurt, Y. (2013). Adaptation of Organizational Climate Scale into Turkish: The Validity and Reliability Study. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 1-11. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/200351

Yirci, R., Karakose, T., Uygun, H., & Ozdemir, T. Y. (2016). Turkish Adaptation of the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 821-832. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a

Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative Behaviour in The Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations. Academic Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995

Zainal, M. A., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2019). Factors Influencing Teachers’ Innovative Behaviour: A Systematic Review. Creative Education, 10(12), 2869-2886. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012213

Announcement

EDUPIJ News!

► Journal Metrics

  • 8% acceptance rate
  • 3.4 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
  • Q2 (2023) CiteScore Best Quartile
  • 0.42 (2023) Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

EDUPIJ Statistics from Scopus

CiteScore: 3.4, view Scopus page

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

► Educational Process: International Journal is member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 

► New issue coming soon! (Volume 13 Issue 2, 2024)