Volume 5 Issue 1 (2016)

Ability, Examination and Inclusive Education: Stretching the Hard Lines of the Educational System

pp. 65-75  |  Published Online: March 2016  |  DOI: 10.12973/edupij.2016.51.5

Halis Sakiz

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to delve into the debate about the epistemological nature of ability and examination, which we have been continuously exposed to, but rarely scrutinized. In the paper, I refer to Turkey as a case and argue that the dominance of ability-based paradigm and its associated assessment and placement systems have created a new educational order which categorizes schools and students based on how they perform at a single point in time. What is more, I critically evaluate the construction of “abilities” and “disabilities” through the means employed in the education system, followed by a discussion of the examination culture as a product of an ability-based system. Finally, I propose inclusive education as a powerful means of transforming the education system to an equitable and educationally effective one in which all students are welcomed and provided with education of good quality that both enriches childhood and maximizes chances of leading a fulfilled adult life.

Keywords: ability-based education, examination culture, inclusive education, equity

References

Ainscow, M. (1999). Understanding the development of inclusive schools. London: Falmer Press.

Ainscow, M. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change? Journal of educational change, 6, 109-124.

Ainscow, M., Booth, T., Dyson, A., Farrell, P., Frankham, J., Gallannaugh, F.,…Smith, R. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. London: Routledge.

Ainscow, M., Howes, A., Farrell, P., & Frankham, J. (2003). Making sense of the development of inclusive practices. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18, 227-242.

Aksit, N. (2007). Educational reform in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 27, 129-137.

Algozzine, B., Ysseldyke, J. E., & McGue, M. (1995). Differentiating low-achieving students: Thoughts on setting the record straight. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 140-144.

Armstrong, F. (2003). Spaced out: Policy, difference and the challenge of inclusive education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Barton, L., & Slee, R. (1999). Competition, selection and inclusive education: Some observations. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3, 3-12.

Bender, W. N., & Wall, M. E. (1994). Social-emotional development of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 323-341.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bulut, M. (2007). Curriculum reform in Turkey: A case of primary school mathematics curriculum. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 203-212.

Diker, N., & Turkun, A. (2013). Social justice for disabled people. ArchNet-International Journal of Architectural Research, 7, 221-243.

Dyson, A. (1999). Inclusion and inclusions: Theories and discourses in inclusive education. In H. Daniels, & P. Garner (Eds.), World yearbook of education 1999: Inclusive education (pp. 36-53). London: Kogan Page.

Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., Jones, L., & Kerr, K. (2010). Equity in education: Creating a fairer education system. Centre for Equity in Education, The University of Manchester: Manchester.

Dyson, A., & Millward, A. (2002). The reform of special education or the transformation of mainstream schools? In S. J. Pijl, C. J. W. Meijer, & S. Hegarty (Eds.), Inclusive education: A global agenda (pp. 51-68). London and New York: Routledge.

Education Reform Initiative [Egitim Reformu Girisimi]. (2011). Turkiye’de kaynastirma/ butunlestirme yoluyla egitimin durumu [The situation of education via inclusion in Turkey] Retrieved from http://erg.sabanciuniv.edu/sites/erg.sabanciuniv.edu/files/Turkiyede_Kaynastirm a_Butunlestirme_Yoluyla_Egitimin_Durumu.pdf

Erkilic, M., & S. Durak. (2013). Tolerable and inclusive learning spaces: An evaluation of policies and specifications for physical environments that promote inclusion in Turkish primary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17, 462-479.

Gamoran, A. (1992). Synthesis of research: Is ability grouping equitable? Educational Leadership, 50, 11-11.

Hallam, S., & Toutounji, I. (1996).What do we know about the grouping of pupils by ability? Institute of Education, University of London: London.

Hegarty, S. (1991). Towards an agenda for research in special education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 6, 87-99.

Hehir, T. (2005).New directions in special education: Eliminating ableism in policy and practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (1999). Raising standards: is ability grouping the answer? Oxford review of education,25, 343-358.

Keogh, B. K., & MacMillan, D. L. (1996). Exceptionality. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 311-330). New York: Simon Shuster/Macmillan.

Kishan, N. R. (2008). Privatization of education. New Delhi: A. P. H. Publishing Corporation.

Kwan-Terry, A. (1991). The economics of language in Singapore: Students’ use of extra-curricular language lessons. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 2, 69-89.

Mee, C. Y. (1998). The Examination Culture and its Impact on Literacy Innovations: The Case of Singapore. Language and Education, 12, 192-209.

Ministry of National Education [MoNE].5580 sayili kanun kapsamındaki ozel okullarda ogrenim gorecek ogrenciler icin verilecek egitim ve ogretim destegi uygulama kilavuzu [A guide for the implementation of the educational and instructional funding to be given to students educated in private schools included in Law no: 5580]. Retrieved from

Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2015). National Education Statistics 2013-2014. Retrieved from http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/istatistik/meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2014_2015.pdf

Nayir, O. Y., Yildirim, B., & Kostur, H. I. (2009). Pre-service teachers’ opinions about constructivism. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 1, 848-851.

Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological review, 91, 328.

Ogurlu, U. (2015). Ostracism among Gifted Adolescents: A Preliminary Study in Turkey. Educational Process: International Journal, 4(1-2), 18-30

Ozbulut, M., & Sayar, O. (2009). Bir sosyal dislanma fotografi: Engelli bireylerin toplumla butunlestirilmesine yonelik tespit, bilgilendirme ve veri tabani olusturma calismasi (OZVERI-Malatya) projesi arastirma sonucları [A picture of social exclusion: outcomes of the OZVERI-Malatya project regarding inclusion of disabled individuals]. Aile ve Toplum, 5, 59-76.

Ozdemir, T. Y., & Yirci, R. (2015). A Situational Analysis of Educational Supervision in the Turkish Educational System. Educational Process: International Journal, 4(1-2), 56-70.

Ozgur, I. (2004). Engelli cocuklar ve egitimi: Ozel egitim [Disabled children and their education: Special education]. Adana: Karahan Kitabevi.

Pedley, R. (1969). The comprehensive school. Middlesex: Penguin Books.

Sakiz, H. (2015). Investigating disability inclusion in Turkey: An exploratory case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).The University of Manchester, Manchester.

Sakiz, H., & Woods, C. (2015). Achieving inclusion of students with disabilities in Turkey: Current challenges and future prospects. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19, 21-35.

Sakiz, H., Woods, C., Sart, H., Ersahin, Z., Aftab, R., Koc, N., & Saricam, H. (2015). The route to ‘inclusive counselling’: Counsellors' perceptions of disability inclusion in Turkey. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19, 250-269.

Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Penguin, London.

Simon, B. (1955). The common secondary school. London: Lawrance & Wishart.

Shieh, CJ., & Demirkol, M. (2014). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Social Networks and their Usage by High School Students. Educational Process: International Journal, 3(1-2), 7-18.

Skrtic, T. M. (Ed.). (1995). Disability and democracy: Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity. New York, Teachers College Press.

Slavin, R. E., & Braddock III, J. H. (1993). Ability grouping: on the wrong track. College Board Review, 168, 11-17.

Sternberg, R. (2008). Applying psychological theories to educational practice. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 150-165.

Sucuoglu, B., & Kargin, T. (2006). Ilkogretimde kaynastirma uygulamalari: Yaklasimlar, yontemler ve teknikler [Inclusive practices in primary education: approaches, methods and techniques]. Istanbul: Morpa Kultur Yayinlari.

Tikly, L., & Barrett, A. M. (2011). Social justice, capabilities and the quality of education in low income countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 3-14.

Turkish Statistical Institute [Turkiye Istatistik Kurumu]. (2010). Survey on problems and expectations of disabled people. Retrieved from www.tuik.gov.tr/IcerikGetir.do?istab_id=244

UNESCO (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Spain:UNESCO.

UNESCO (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. France: UNESCO Publishing.

Announcement

EDUPIJ News!

► New issue coming soon! (Volume 10 Issue 4, 2021)

► Educational Process: international journal has been accepted for inclusion in Scopus | Elsevier and Education Research Abstracts Online (ERA).