School-Based Teacher Mentoring – Further Evidence for the “Cinderella” Metaphor?

Background/purpose. There exists a desire to provide schoolteachers with mentors. In English schools, school-based mentors are mandatory for schools participating in Initial Teacher Education and the Early Career Framework. The purpose of this study is to highlight the need for a professional mentoring capacity within schools without burdening existing teachers’ already stretched workload. To that end, a case study of secondary school mathematics teachers acting as early career teacher mentors were interviewed in order to ascertain whether they were officially recognized as school-based mentors. The participants were asked whether they held a title as a mentor, and their responses analyzed and interpreted according to Miles et al.’s (2020) “think display” visualization.

Materials/methods. The literature has previously used the “Cinderella” metaphor to describe the role of school-based mentors. This study pursues this analogy to interpret school-based mentors’ qualitative responses to juxtapose the metaphor in relation to schoolteacher recruitment and retention coupled to an extrinsic motivating factor to provide school-based teacher mentoring. Seven school-based mentors were interviewed separately within their own practice schools. Audio recordings and transcriptions of the interviews were shared with each respective participant for their approval and to check for accuracy, and each were also given the opportunity to withdraw from the study at every sequence, following the ethics agreement laid out by the researcher’s university. The collected data were analyzed according to Miles et al.’s (2020) “think display” technique and a constructivist interpretation following research by Knapp (2019) to integrate theories of mentoring exposed by Kemmis et al. (2014).

Results. The study founds that most teachers acting as mentors were extrinsically charged to fulfill the role since their employing school participated in initial and early career teacher provision. None of the participating teachers held a specific title of mentor as reward for their endeavor. This case study consisted of seven participants from seven different schools, and although small, the participant group was homogenous and therefore representative so as to interpret the phenomenon. The findings were then used to make predictions that could affect the success of mentoring programs for teachers.

Conclusion. The study intended to add further evidence of the ethnomethodological actions of teacher mentoring in order to create an understanding of the profession in daily life. School teacher mentoring is seen as an effective way to support teachers, but if mentors are not recognized or rewarded the provision is at risk of becoming a cottage industry and unlikely to become common practice without being made mandatory. Governments may have act with good intent, but often their solutions are a one-size-fits-all approach and lack sufficient financial incentive. Teacher recruitment and retention is crucial to a government’s education policy and therefore critical that strategies imposed upon teachers do not negatively impact upon their well-being or existing workload. This original case study aims to add to the empirical evidence existing in the field of teacher mentoring.

Keywords: Mentor, Cinderella, intrinsic, extrinsic, ancillary

References

Alejo-González, R. (2022). Metaphor in the Academic Mentoring of International Undergraduate Students: The Erasmus Experience. Metaphor and Symbol, 37(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1941969

Boettcher, K. (1997). Mentoring: The Magical Wand in Education. In C. A. Mullen, M. D. Cox, C. K. Boettcher, & D. S. Adoue (Eds.), Breaking the Circle of One: Redefining Mentorship in the Lives and Writings of Educators (pp. 55-67). Lang.

Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Ing, M., Loeb, H., & Wyckoff, J. (2011). The influence of school administration on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 303-333. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210380788

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cain, B. (2007). A review of the mental workload literature. Defence Research and Development Canada. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA474193.pdf

Casey, K. (1990). Teacher as Mother: Theorising in the life histories of contemporary women teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 20(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764900200310

Chughati, F., & Perveen, U. (2013). A Study of Teacher’s Workload and Job Satisfaction in Public and Private Schools at Secondary Level in Lahore City Pakistan. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 202-214. http://www.ajssh.leena-luna.co.jp/AJSSHPDFs/Vol.2(1)/AJSSH2013(2.1-22).pdf

Cohen, N. (2003). The Journey of the Principles of Adult Mentoring Inventory. Adult Learning, 14(1), 4-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/104515950301400102

Colson, T., & Satterfield, C. (2018). The effects of strategic compensation on teacher retention. Power and Education, 10(1), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757743818758782

Department for Education. (2015). Government response to the Workload Challenge. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f0c7ded915d74e6228124/Government_Response_to_the_Workload_Challenge.pdf .

Department for Education. (2016a). National Standards for School-Based Initial Teacher Training (ITT) Mentors. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a803fe4ed915d74e33f9541/Mentor_standards_report_Final.pdf

Department for Education. (2016b). Standard for teachers’ professional development Implementation guidance for school leaders, teachers, and organisations that offer professional development for teachers. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/standard-for-teachers-professional-development

Department for Education. (2018). [Revised]. Induction for newly qualified teachers (England) Statutory guidance for appropriate bodies, headteachers, school staff and governing bodies. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f7496698fa8f5188aa28957/Statutory_Induction_Guidance_2019.pdf

Department for Education. (2019a). Early Career Framework. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-career-framework

Department for Education. (2019b). ITT Core Content Framework. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/initial-teacher-training-itt-core-content-framework

Department for Education. (2020a). National Professional Qualification (NPQ): Executive Leadership Framework. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63a1dcc38fa8f5390dfdf560/NPQ_Executive_Leadership_FINAL_Ref.pdf

Department for Education. (2020b). National Professional Qualification (NPQ): Headship Framework. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63a1dc9d8fa8f539169b1d74/NPQ_Headship_FINAL_Ref.pdf

Department for Education. (2020c). National Professional Qualification (NPQ): Leading Behaviour and Culture Framework. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63a1dc408fa8f53911cfcd1d/NPQ_Leading_Behaviour_and_Culture_FINAL_Ref.pdf

Department for Education. (2020d). National Professional Qualification (NPQ): Leading Senior Leadership/Headship/Executive Leadership Framework. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63a1dc7a8fa8f539198d9bca/NPQ_Senior_Leadership_FINAL_Ref.pdf

Department for Education. (2020e). National Professional Qualification (NPQ): Leading Teacher Development Framework. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/63a1dc658fa8f5390dfdf55e/NPQ_Leading_Teaching_FINAL_Ref.pdf

Department for Education. (2021). Staffing and employment advice for schools: Departmental advice for school leaders, governing bodies, academy trusts and local authorities. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1026591/Staff_Advice_Handbook_Update_-_October_2021.pdf

Department for Education. (2022a). Implementing your school’s approach to pay: Advice for maintained schools, academies and local authorities. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6527ee4daea2d00013219c6d/Implementing_your_school_s_approach_to_pay_October_2023.pdf

Department for Education. (2022b, October 19). ITT Reform: Provider Conference (Stage 2).

Department for Education. (2022c). [Updated]. Statutory guidance, Initial teacher training (ITT): criteria and supporting advice. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/initial-teacher-training-criteria/initial-teacher-training-itt-criteria-and-supporting-advice

Doherty, J. (2020). A systematic review of literature on teacher attrition and school-related factors that affect it. TEAN Journal, 12(1), 75-84. https://ojs.cumbria.ac.uk/index.php/TEAN/article/view/646

Faulkner-Ellis, H., & Worth, J. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Teacher Attrition Rates in England and Wales. National Foundation for Educational Research. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/627247

Fuller, F., & Brown, O. H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education: Part II. The 74th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 25-52). University of Chicago Press.

Gallagher, S., & Gallagher, J. (2019). Acting oneself as another: An actor’s empathy for her character. Topoi, 39, 779-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9624-7

Ganser, T. (1994, April 4-8). Metaphors for mentoring: An exploratory study [Conference presentation]. Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Hairon, S., & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore Schools and Professional Development and School leadership in an Asian Hierarchical System. Educational Review, 64(4), 405-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.625111

Helterbran, V. (2016). Teacher Leadership: Overcoming ‘I am just a teacher’ syndrome. In E. Blair (Ed.), Teacher leadership: The “new” foundations of teacher education: A reader (pp. 114-120). Lang.

HM Government. (2022). Opportunity for all Strong schools with great teachers for your child. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/62416cb5d3bf7f32add7819f/Opportunity_for_all_strong_schools_with_great_teachers_for_your_child__print_version_.pdf

Kamrath, B., & Bradford, K. (2020). A Case Study of Teacher Turnover and Retention in an Urban Elementary School. Educational Considerations, 45(3), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.2181

Kemmis, S., Heikkinen, H. L., Fransson, G., Aspfors, J., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Mentoring of new teachers as a contested practice: Supervision, support and collaborative self-development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.001

Knapp, N. F. (2019). The shape activity: Social constructivism in the psychology classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 46(1), 87-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318816181

Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092

Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608-625. https://doi.org/10.5465/255910

Kyngäs, H., Kääriäinen, M., & Elo, S. (2020). The trustworthiness of content analysis. In H. Kyngäs, M. Kääriäinen, & S. Elo (Eds.), The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research (pp. 41-48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_5

Leslie, L. L. (1972). Are high response rates essential to valid surveys? Social Science Research, 1(3), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(72)90080-4

Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.

Lynn, S., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2020). Operationalizing the mentoring processes as perceived by teacher mentors. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(3), 295-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2020.1783499

Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.

Moir, E. (1999). The stages of a teacher’s first year. In M. Scherer (Ed.), A better beginning: Supporting and mentoring new teachers (pp. 19-23). Kendall/Hunt.

Murtagh, L., & Dawes, L. (2020). National Standards for School Based Mentors: The potential to recognise the “Cinderella” role of mentoring? International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 10(1), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-05-2020-0025

Mutlu-Gülbak, G. (2023). Expectations for Training Mentors: Insights from a Preservice Language Teacher Education Program. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(2), 76-92. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.122.5

National Association of Schoolteachers, Union of Women Teachers. (2022). Directed Time (England). https://www.nasuwt.org.uk/advice/conditions-of-service/teachers-working-hours/directed-time-england.html

National Audit Office. (2017). Retaining and developing the teaching workforce. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Retaining-and-developing-the-teaching-workforce.pdf

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Owusu-Agyeman, Y. (2022). The Mentoring Experiences of Early Career and Senior Academics in a Multicampus University in South Africa. Educational Process: International Journal, 11(1), 65-85. https://dx.doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2022.111.5

Perryman, J., & Calvert, G. (2020). What Motivates People to Teach, and Why do they Leave? Accountability, Performativity and Teacher Retention. British Journal of Education Studies, 68(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417

Reitman, G., & Karge, B. (2019). Investing in Teacher Support Leads to Teacher Retention: Six supports administrators should consider for new teachers. Multicultural Education, 27(1), 7-18.

Runyan, C. (1999). Mentoring: Aim and assess. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 12(4), 14-17. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/mwer/vol12/iss4/7/

Sanders, S. (1994). Mathematics and Mentoring. In B. Jawarski & A. Watson (Eds.)., Mentoring in Mathematics Teaching (pp. 29-40). Routledge.

Sellen, P. (2016). Teacher Workload and Professional Development in England’s Secondary School: Insights from TALIS. Education Policy Institute.

Springer, M. G., Swain, W. A., & Rodriguez, L. A. (2016). Effective teacher retention bonuses: Evidence from Tennessee. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715609687

Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher Job Satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73(1), 71-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247

UK Parliament. (2023, March 20). Education Committee launches new inquiry into teacher recruitment, training, and retention. https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/203/education-committee/news/194283/education-committee-launches-new-inquiry-into-teacher-recruitment-training-and-retention/

Walker, M., Worth, J., & Van den Brande, J. (2019). Teacher Workload Survey 2019: Research report. National Foundation for Educational Research, for Department for Education. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5e12fcb7e5274a0f9e82e4fd/teacher_workload_survey_2019_main_report_amended.pdf

Wilkinson, C. (2022). The need for Qualified School Teacher Mentors for Initial Teacher Training, Early Career Teachers and Beyond: Why don’t school teacher mentors need a qualification in mentoring? Educational Process: International Journal, 11(3), 7-31. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2022.113.1

Wolfe, D. M. (1992). Designing Training and Selecting Incentives for Mentor Programs. In T. Bey & T. Holmes (Eds.), Mentoring: Contemporary Principles and Issues (pp. 103-110). Association of Teacher Educators.

Wollheim, R. (1987). Painting as an art. Thames and Hudson.

Worth, J., & Faulkner-Ellis, H. (2022). Teacher Labour Market in England, 2022 Annual Report. National Foundation for Educational Research. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/media/3mudk0m4/teacher_labour_market_in_england_annual_report_2022.pdf

Wyre, D., Gaudet, C., & McNeese, M. (2016). So You Want to Be a Mentor? An Analysis of Mentor Competencies. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1165490.

Announcement

EDUPIJ News!

► Journal Metrics

8% acceptance rate
3.4 (2023) CiteScore (Scopus)
Q2 (2023) CiteScore Best Quartile
0.42 (2023) Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

► EDUPIJ Statistics from Scopus

CiteScore: 3.4, view Scopus page

► Educational Process: International Journal is member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

► New issue coming soon! (Volume 13 Issue 2, 2024)