Influences of Multimedia Lesson Contents On Effective Learning
pp. 47-58 | Published Online: November 2013 | DOI: 10.12973/edupij.2013.212.4
Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir, Mukadder Boydak Ozan, Ismail Aydogan
In the information era that we experience today, there is a rapid change in the methods, techniques and materials used for education and teaching. The usage of information and communication technology-assisted teaching materials are becoming more commonplace. Parallel to these developments, the Ministry of National Education took steps to develop IT substructures of all schools in the country and implemented many projects. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not the multimedia lesson content used by teachers affect effective learning. This study is a qualitative study, conducted with 45 teachers working in primary schools during the 2011-2012 academic year. According to the study findings, participants believe that using multimedia lesson content during lectures increases student motivation, makes students more curious and interested, and think that using multimedia lesson content has positive effects.
Keywords: information technology, multimedia lesson content, teachers, effective learningReferences
Aldag, H., & Sezgin, E. (2002). Dual Coding Theory In Multimedia Applications Summary, M.U. Ataturk Egitim Fakultesi Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15, 29-44.
Aslan, Z., & Dogdu, S. (1993). Egitim teknolojisi uygulamalari ve egitim arac-gerecleri. Ankara: Tekisik Ofset.
Atici, B. (2007). The Efficiency of Virtual Learning Environments Based on Social Knowledge Construction on Learners’ Achievement And Attitudes. Egitim ve Bilim, 32, 143.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative Research for Education: An introduction to Theories and Methods (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Education Group.
Cavas, B. (2000). The Use of the Computer Technology in Seventh Grade Science Topics Which Contain Mathematics. International Special Education Congress ISEC-2000 July, 24-26th 2000, Manchester, UK.
Celik, L. (2010). Ogretim materyallerinin hazirlanmasi ve secimi. In O. Demirel, & E. Altun (Eds), Ogretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Tasarimi (pp.145-169). (4th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Yayinlari.
Cetin, O., & Gunay, Y. (2010). Fen Egitiminde Web Tabanli Ogretimin Ogrencilerin Akademik Basarilarina ve Tutumlarina Etkisi, Cukurova Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 3(38), 19-34.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dale, E. (1969). Audiovisual Methods in Teaching, New York: Dryden Press.
Demirel, O. (2003). Ogretme sanati. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayinlari.
Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Forcier, C. R., & Descy, E. D. (2002). The Computer as An Educational Tool: Productivity and Problem Solving. Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Boston: Pearson Education.
Hatch, J.A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Isman, A. (2008). Ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal gelistirme. Ankara: Pegem Yayinlari.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
Koper, E. J. R. (2003). Combining reusable learning resources and services to pedagogical purposeful units of learning. In A. Littlejohn (Ed), Reusing online resources: A sustainable approach to eLearning (pp.46-59). London: Kogan Page.
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a Dual- Coding Theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.
Neuman, W. L. (2007). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson.
Najjar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 129-150.
Ors, F., & Tetik, S. (2010). New Management Paradigms In Globalizing World: Change And Communication. Cukurova Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 19(3), 439-456.
Ozden, Y. (1998). Egitimde Donusum, Yeni Degerler ve Olusumlar. Onder Matbaacilik, Ankara.
Parsa, A. F. (2004). Imgenin Gucu ve Gorsel Kulturun Yukselisi, Anadili Dergisi, 33, Izmir: Ankara Universitesi TOMER Izmir Subesi Yayinlari, 59-71.
Rothe, J. P. (2000). Undertaking qualitative research: Concepts and cases in injury, health and social life. Alberta: The University of Alberta Press.
Sari, I. F. (1993). Interaktif Multimedya. Macintosh Dunyasi, 34-39.
Sarpkaya, Y., Karasekreter, N., & Dogan, M. (2007). Effect of Distant Education Software Substructure at Information Permanence and Validity, Akademik Bilisim’07 - IX. Akademik Bilisim Konferansi Bildirileri 31 Ocak - 2 Subat, Dumlupinar Universitesi, Kutahya.
Toprak, M., & Erdogan, A. (2012). Lifelong Learning: Concept, Policy, Instruments and Implementation. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 2(2), 69-91.
Wissick, C. A. (1996). Multimedia: Enhancing instruction for students with learning disabilities, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(5), 494-503.
Yalin, H. I. (2004). Ogretim teknolojileri ve materyal gelistirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
Yamamoto, G. T., Demiray, U., & Kesim, M. (2010). Turkiye'de E-Ogrenme-Gelismeler ve Uygulamalar. Ankara: Cem Web Ofset.