Volume 8 Issue 2 (2019)

Am I Supposed to Create Knowledge?: Pedagogical Challenges of Doctoral Mentors

pp. 145-152  |  Published Online: March 2019  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2019.82.5

Jung-ah Choi


This paper discusses the nature and characteristics of doctoral dissertation learning and the role of mentor in the dissertation stage. Doctoral level education requires a considerable degree of learner’s independent thinking. While independence has been discussed as a personal trait or in relation to the socialization of doctoral education, independence has rarely been discussed as a higher level of cognitive development necessary to create new knowledge. When students transition from a consumer of knowledge to a creator/owner of knowledge, they are required to adopt a new epistemology, i.e., a new way of knowing. How do doctoral advisors/mentors successfully open students to a new way of knowing? This paper addresses the pedagogical foundations of doctoral advising. Drawing on theories of student-centered pedagogy and self-directed learning, this paper attempts to conceptualize the doctoral supervisor’s role in the case of doctoral supervision.

Keywords: doctoral mentor, knowledge, pedagogical challenges


Ahn, R., & Class, M. (2011). Student-centered pedagogy: Co-construction of knowledge through student-generated midterm exams. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 269-281.

Anderson, S., & Anderson, B. (2012). Preparation and socialisation of the education professoriate: Narratives of doctoral student-instructors. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 239-251.

Baker, V. L., & Pifer, M. J. (2011). The role of relationships in the transition from doctoral student to independent scholar. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 5-17.

Baker, V. L., Pifer, M. J., & Flemion, B. (2013). Process challenges and learning-based interactions in stage 2 of doctoral education: Implications from two applied social science fields. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 449-476.

Brown, R. T., Daly, B. P., & Leong, F. T. (2009). Mentoring in research: A developmental approach. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(3), 306-313.

Commons, M. L., Richards, F. A., & Armon, C. (Eds.) (1984). Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (Vol. 1). New York: Praeger Publishers.

Delamont, S., Parry, O., & Atkinson, P. (1998). Creating a delicate balance: The doctoral supervisor’s dilemmas. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(2), 157-172.

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College teaching, 44(2), 43-47.

Gardner, S. K. (2008). What’s too much and what’s too little?: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326-350.

Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia: Pew Charitable Trusts.

Grow, G. O. (1991). Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 125-149.

Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 79-92.

Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for teachers and learners. New York, NY: Association Press.

Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267-281.

Lovitts, B. E. (2005). Being a good course‐taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in higher education, 30(2), 137-154.

Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher education, 27(2), 135-150.

Raddon, M. B., Raby, R., & Sharpe, E. (2009). The Challenges of Teaching Qualitative Coding: Can a Learning Object Help? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 336-347.

Simon, B. (1999). Why no pedagogy in England? In J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds.), Learners and Pedagogy (pp. 34-45). London: Paul Chapman.

Turner, C. S. V., & Thompson, J. R. (1993). Socializing women doctoral students: Minority and majority experiences. The Review of Higher Education, 16(3), 355-370.

Vilkinas, T. (2008). An exploratory study of the supervision of Ph. D./research students’ theses. Innovative Higher Education, 32(5), 297-311.

Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. John Wiley & Sons.

Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-Centered Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 92-97.


COPE Membership

Cope logo. 

Educational Process: International Journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 

Call for Papers 

EDUPIJ is calling for submissions to the Volume 8, Issue 3, 2019. Submission Deadline: May 31, 2019.