Volume 7 Issue 4 (2018)

Theoretical Approaches vs. Teacher as a Role Model Towards Language Learning

pp. 278-290  |  Published Online: November 2018  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2018.74.5

Arberore Bicaj, Arif Shala


Everyone learns a foreign language in their own way, but generally it is never considered to be very easy. The way a foreign language is taught is a significantly important area of academic research. This paper tries to identify the ways in which a foreign language can be most easily learned in order to identify the best strategies. Acknowledging the global impact of the English language, this paper explores the theoretical approaches, starting from the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach and the Task-based approach. Also considered is the role of the teacher as a model in language learning. Therefore, in order to reach conclusions, foreign language learning has been approached on a theoretical level by examining the international literature. In this way, a compilation of the literature has been produced and analyzed in order to fulfill the purpose of this research.

Keywords: foreign language, role model, communicative language teaching approach, task-based learning, teacher


AlDhafiri, N. R. (2015). The Role of Interpersonal EFL Teacher Behaviour in Enhancing Saudi Students’ Learning. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 47-55.

Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(3), 314-342.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21-41.

Bandura, A. (2008). Observational Learning. Wiley Online Library. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781405186407.wbieco004.

Bao, R., & Du, X. (2015). Learners’ L1 Use in a Task-based Classroom: Learning Chinese as a Foreign Language from a Sociocultural Perspective. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(1), 12-20.

Breen, M. (1987). Learner Contributions to Task Design. In C. Candling, & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language Learning Tasks.(pp. 3-46). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., van Tartwijk, J., & Wubbels, T. (2005). An interpersonal perspective on teacher behaviour in the classroom. In L. V. Barnes (Ed.), Contemporary Teaching and Teacher Issues (pp. 197-226). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Brekelmans, M., Sleegers, P., & Fraser, B. (2000). Teaching for active learning. In R. J. Simons, J. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New Learning (pp. 227-242). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., & Créton, H. A. (1990). A study of student perceptions of physics teacher behaviour. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(4), 335-350.

Bruton, A. (2005). Task-based language teaching: for the state secondary FL classroom? The Language Learning Journal, 31(1), 55-68.

Carless, D. (2008). Student use of the mother tongue in the task-based classroom. ELT Journal, 62(4), 331-338.

Chang, M. M., & Lehman, J. D. (2002). Learning foreign language through an interactive multimedia program: An experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. CALICO journal, 81-98.

Chang, S.-C. (2011). A Contrastive Study of Grammar Translation Method and Communicative Approach in Teaching English Grammar. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 13-24.

Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (Eds.). (2007). Language Learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the Native Speaker in Language Teaching: TESOL Quarterly, 33(2), 185-209.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Daisy. (2012). Communicative Language Teaching – A Comprehensive Approach to English Language Teaching. Language in India, 12(2), 249-265.

Den Brok, P. (2001). Teaching and student outcomes. Utrecht: W. C. C.

Den Brok, P., Fisher, D., Brekelmans, M., Rickards, T., Wubbels, T., Levy, J., & Waldrip, B. (2003). Students' Perceptions of Secondary Science Teachers' Interpersonal Style in Six Countries: A Study on the Cross National Validity of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction.

Den Brok, P., Fisher, D., & Scott, R. (2005). The importance of teacher interpersonal behaviour for student attitudes in Brunei primary sciences classes. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 765-779.

Den Brok, P., Levy, J., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2005). The effect of teacher interpersonal behaviour on students' subject-specific motivation. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 20-33.

Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and Motivating in the Foreign Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284.

Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom Management Techniques and Student Discipline.

Eckman, F. R., Highland, D., Lee, P. W., Mileham, J., & Rutkowski Weber, R. (Eds.). (2010). Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge.

El-Dakhs, D. A. (2015). The Integration of Form-focused Instruction within Communicative Language Teaching: Instructional Options. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(5), 1125-1131.

Fisher, D., Waldrip, B., & den Brok, P. (2005). Students’ perceptions of primary teachers’ interpersonal behavior and of cultural dimensions in the classroom environment. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1-2), 25-38.

Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Teacher interpersonal behaviour, classroom environment and student outcomes in primary mathematics classes in Singapore. Learning Environments Research, 1(2), 199-229.

Green, J., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at the learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.

Griffiths, C. (2008). Teaching/learning method and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from Good Language Learners (pp. 49-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Groenendijk, T., Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2011). The Effect of Observational Learning on Student’s Performance, Processes, and Motivation in two Creative Domains. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 3-28.

Groenendijk, T., Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2013). Learning to be creative. The Effects of Observational Learning on Students’ Design Products and Processes. Learning and Instruction, 28, 35-47.

Hajebi, M., SeddiQ. T., Fahandezh, F., & Salari, H. (2018). The Role of Web-based Language Teaching on Vocabulary Retention of Adult Pre-intermediate. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 372-378.

Han, L. (2014). Teacher’s Role in Developing Learner Autonomy: A Literature Review. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2), 21-27.

Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching [Review of the book The Practice of English Language Teaching, by Tricia Hedge]. ELT Journal, 57(4), 401-405.

Harmer, J. (2003). How to teach English. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Henderson, D. G. (1995). A study of the classroom and laboratory environments and student attitude and achievement in senior Secondary Biology classes (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Perth: Curtin University of Technology.

Huang, D. (2016). A Study on the Application of Task-based Language Teaching Method in a Comprehensive English Class in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 118-127.

Hymes, D. H. (1966). Two types of linguistic relativity. In W. Bright (Ed.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 114-158). The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.

Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D., & Smith, B. (2004). Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. The Higher Education Academy140.

Khany, R., & Khosravian, F. (2014). Iranian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Development through Wikipedia. English Language Teaching, 7(7), 57-67.

Khazai, S., Vahid Dastjerdi, H., & Talebinejhad, M. R. (2011).The role of mobile communications technology in teaching and learning English vocabulary. Journal of Technology of Education, 6(2), 135-142.

Kim, H., Fisher, D., & Fraser, B. (2000). Classroom environment and teacher interpersonal behaviour in secondary science classes in Korea. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(1), 3-22.

Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

Lan, R. L. (2005). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of University of Maryland. Retrieved from http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/2480/1/umi-umd-2352.pdf.

Lan, R., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4), 339-379.

Lewis, L. H. (Ed.). (1986). Experiential and simulation techniques for teaching adults (No. 30). Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.

Lopes, J. (2004). Introducing TBI for teaching English in Brazil: learning how to leap the hurdles. In B. L. Leaver & J. R. Willis (Eds.), Task-based instruction in foreign language education (pp. 83-95). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. London: Routledge.

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (2011). Task-Based Language Teaching. Beijing: Foreign Language teaching and Research Press.

O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ortega, L. (2013). Understanding second language acquisition. Abingdon: Routledge.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Pattison, P. (1987). Developing Communication Skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Prabhu, N. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy: a perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional – Design Theories and Models: A new Paradigm of Instructional Theory. New York/London: Routledge.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richardson, W. (2004). Blogging and RSS. What's It.

Rosenthal, T. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1978). Social Learning and. Cognition (New York: Academic Press, 1978), 71-74.

Rubin, J. (1975). What the 'Good Language Learner' Can Teach Us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41-50.

Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 261-277.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.

Selen, T., & Selma, D. (2016). A Study on Language Learning Strategy Use of Young Turkish Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 42-48.

Shafaei, A., & Abdul Rahim, H. (2015). Does project-based learning enhance Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary recall and retention? Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(2), 83-99.

Shi, L., Han, Y. J., Ding, X. G., Wei, L., & Gu, Z. M. (2006). An SPN-based integrated model for Web prefetching and caching. Journal of Computer Science and Technology21(4), 482-489.

Sykes, H. A. (2015). The Good Language Learner Revisited: A Case Study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(4), 713-720.

Telli, S., den Brok, P., & Cakiroglu, J. (2007). Students’ perceptions of science teachers’ interpersonal behaviour in secondary schools: Development of a Turkish version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Learning Environments Research, 10(2), 115-129.

Tinker Sachs, G. (2007). The Challenges of Adopting and Adapting Task-based Cooperative Teaching and Learning in an EFL context. In K. Van den Branden, K. Van Gorp, & M. Verhelst (Eds.), Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective (pp. 235-264). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tozcu, A., & Coady, J. (2004). Successful learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefits reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(5), 473-495.

Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research43(1-2), 6-24.

Yu, T. M., & Zhu, C. (2011). Relationship between teachers’ preferred teacher–student interpersonal behaviour and intellectual styles. An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 31(3), 301-331.

Yusuf, M. A., Sim, T. S., & Su’ad, A. (2014). Students‟ proficiency and textual computer gloss use in facilitating vocabulary knowledge. English Language Teaching, 7(11), 99-107.

Zhao, G., & Niu, Z. (2015). Approaches to Language Teaching and Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(4), 798-802.


COPE Membership

Cope logo. 

Educational Process: International Journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 

Call for Papers

EDUPIJ is calling for submissions to the Volume 8, Issue 1, 2019. Submission Deadline: December 31, 2018.