Volume 7 Issue 4 (2018)

Comparison Between Correlation of Creative Thinking Skills and Learning Results, and Correlation of Creative Thinking Skills and Retention in the Implementation of Predict Observe Explain (POE) Learning Model in Senior High Schools in Malang, Indonesia

pp. 237-245  |  Published Online: November 2018  |  DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2018.74.2

Frengky Neolaka, Aloysius Duran Corebima

Abstract

This correlational research was conducted in order to uncover the correlation between creative thinking skills and learning results, as well as between creative thinking skills and retention in the implementation of Predict Observe Explain (POE) learning model. The population of this research were students of Class X senior high schools in Malang, Indonesia, in the odd semester of 2017/2018 academic year. The sample used was F1 class students of Senior High School 5 Malang. The results of simple linear regression analysis show that creative thinking skills correlate with learning results through the implementation of POE learning model. The contribution of creative thinking skills toward learning results was as much as 32%. However, creative thinking skills do not correlate with students’ cognitive retention. Students may experience difficulties retrieving information stored in their memory because new knowledge is stored only in their short-term memory. Factors that might have caused this to occur are that students only learn in order to pass examinations. Learning is undertaken in order to obtain high exam scores and when students are forced to complete assignments, but they do not continue learning afterwards.

Keywords: creative thinking, learning results, retention, POE

References

Agustina, W., & Noor, F. (2016). Hubungan hasil belajar dan tingkat berpikir kreatif siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika [The Correlation between Learning Results and the Levels of Students creative Thinking Skills in Mathematics Learning]. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(3), 191-199.

Anderson, J. R. (1995). Learning and Memory: An integrated approach (4th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2, 89-195.

Awang H., & Ramly, I. (2008). Creative Thinking Skill Approach Through Problem-Based Learning: Pedagogy and Practice in the Engineering Classroom. International Journal of Human and Science, 3(1), 18-23.

Berry, M. (2012). Meaningful Learning and ICT, Retrieved from http://milesberry.net/2009/09/meaningful-learning-and-ict/

Binkley, M. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century skills. London: Springer.

Bos, C. S., & Vaughn, S. (1994). Strategies for Teaching Students. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Corebima, A. D. (2016). Pembelajaran Biologi Di Indonesia Bukan Untuk Hidup [Biology Learning in Indonesia is not for Life]. Proceeding of Biology Education Conference. (pp. 8-22). Semarang, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Sebelas Maret University.

Coughlan, A. (2007). LEARNING TO LEARN: Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking. DCU Student Learning Resources. Retrieved from https://www4.dcu.ie/sites/default/files/students/studentlearning/creativeandcritica.pdf

De Bono, E. (1967). The use of lateral thinking. London, Cape.

DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2000). Quantum Learning, Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan [Quantum Learning, Making Accustomed to Comfortable and Fun Learning]. Bandung: Mizan Media Utama.

Ellis, H., & Hunt, R. R. (1993). Fundamentals of Cognitive Psychology (5th ed.). Dubuque: Iowa: Brown Communications.

Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills. A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Corwin.

Gunawan, I., Suraya, S. N., & Tryanasari, D. (2014). Hubungan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Dan Kritis Dengan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Matakuliah Konsep Sains Ii Prodi PGSD Ikip Pgri Madiun [The Correlation between creative and critical Thinking Skills toward Students’ Learning Achievement In Science Concept Course in PGSD Department of IKIP PGRI Madiun]. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 10-40.

Hadibyono, H. (2013). Pengaruh E-Evaluation Bersiklus Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Kimia Siswa SMK [The Effect of E-Evaluation Cycle on Students’ Chemistry Learning Achievement of Vocational Senior High Schools]. Jurnal Pelenitian Pendidikan Sains. 3(1), 299-305.

Hilgard, E., & Bower, G. H. (1975). Theories of learning (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Indriana, V., Nurdin, A., & Usman, M. (2015). Penerapan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Poe (Predict observe-Explain) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas XI IPA-1 SMAN 22 Makassar [The Implementation of Poe (Predict observe-Explain) Learning Model to improve the creative Thinking Skills of Class XI Science 1 Students of Senior High School 22, Makassar]. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 51-62.

Jannah, R. M. (2017). Hubungan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dengan hasil belajar ipa siswa kelas iv mi raudhatul jannah Jakarta [The Correlation between Students’ creative Thinking Skills and Science Learning Results of Class IV Students in Raudhatul Jannah Islamic Elementary School, Jakarta] (Unpublished thesis). Uin syarif hidayahtullah, Jakarta.

Johnson, D. W. (2002). Meaningful Assessment A manageable and Cooperative Process. USA: Allyn and Bacon.

Nuriadin, I., & Perbowo, K. S. (2013). Analisis Korelasi Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik Smp Negeri 3 Lurangung Kuningan Jawa Barat [Correlation Analysis of mathematical creative Thinking Skills toward Mathematics Learning Results of the Students of Junior High School 3 Lurangung Kuningan, West Java]. Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung, 2(1), 65-74.

O’Neel, C. G., Fuligni, A. J., & Huynh, V. W. (2013). To Study or to Sleep? The Academic Costs of Extra Studying at the Expense of Sleep. Child Development, 84(1), 133-142.

Slavin, R. E. (1993). Educational Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Snyder Gueldenzophr, L., & Snyder, M. J. (2008). Teaching Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skills. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 50(2), 90-99.

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Cognitive Psychology (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt‐Brace College Publisher.

Sunaryo. (1989). Strategi Belajar Mengajar dalam Pengajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial [Teaching and Learning Strategies in Social Science]. Jakarta: Debdikbud Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Objek Pengembangan Lembaga Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan.

Suyanto. (2006). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran Realistik Ekspositori dan Sikap Murid pada Pelajaran Matematika terhadap Keterampilan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita dan Retensi Hasil Belajar [The Effect of realistic Expository Learning Approach and Students’ Attitudes on Problem Solving of Story Items and Retention Skills]. (Unpublished thesis). Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Suyanto, Y. P., Susanto, H., & Linuwih, S. (2012). Keefektifan Penggunaan Strategi Predict, Observe and Explain untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Siswa [The Effectiveness of Predict, Observe and Explain Learning Strategy to improve Students’ critical and creative Thinking Skills]. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 1(1), 16-25.

Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educator. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Winkel, W. S. (2004). Psikologi Pengajaran [Teaching Psychology]. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Wulandari, R. R. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran PDEODEP Terhadap Hasil
Belajar Kognitif Fisika Siswa SMA [The Effect of PDEODEP Learning Model on Cognitive Learning Results of Physics of Senior High School Students]. Proceeding of Seminar Nasional Fisika. (pp. 181-185). Jakarta, Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, State University of Jakarta.

Announcement

COPE Membership

Cope logo. 

Educational Process: International Journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 

Call for Papers

EDUPIJ is calling for submissions to the Volume 8, Issue 1, 2019. Submission Deadline: December 31, 2018.