Pitfalls of Globalization: A Case of Science Education in Less Developed Countries
pp. 180-188 | Published Online: August 2018 | DOI: 10.22521/edupij.2018.73.2
Shairose Irfan Jessani
The purpose of this paper is two-fold; to explain the ideological thrust of globalization in shaping different approaches of science education; and to discuss the impact of neo-liberal agenda on the science education reforms in LDCs. The structure of the paper is as follow. First, the trends and approaches of western science education along with their theoretical assumptions are discussed. Then, the linkage of neo-liberal ideology with the concept of globalization and current science education is explored. Next, the role of English language, aid agencies and educational research in the context of science education are debated in defining the status of LDCs in knowledge economy. Finally, a call for “indigenization” in curriculum, policies and practices of LDCs is made, in order to achieve the goal of a relevant and context-sensitive science education.
Keywords: science education, neo-liberal agenda, less developed countriesReferences
Ashraf, M., & Kopweh, P. (2012). Globalisation and education policy of Pakistan: The challenges of access and equity in education. Glasgow: College of Social Sciences, School of Education, University of Glasgow.
Carter, L., & Dediwalage, R. (2010). Globalisation and science education: The case of sustainability by the bay. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(2), 275-291.
Chang, F. H. (2014). Teacher education policies and programs in Pakistan: The growth of market approaches and their impact on the implementation and the effectiveness of traditional teacher education programs. Doctoral Dissertation. Michigan State University.
De Jong, O. (2007). Trends in western science curricula and science education research: A bird’s eye view. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(1), 15-22.
Halai, N. (2008). Curriculum reform in science education in Pakistan. In R. K. Coll & N. Taylor (Eds.), Science education in context: An international examination of the influence of context on science curricula development and implementation (pp. 115-129). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Jessani, S. I. (2007). Integration of science, technology and society (STS) approach in teaching chemistry at higher secondary level (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Aga Khan University, Institute for Educational Development, Karachi.
Jessani, S. I. (2015). Science Education: Issues, Approaches and Challenges. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 2(1), 79-87.
Kazmi, S. W. (2005). Role of education in globalization: A case for Pakistan. SAARC Journal of Human Resource Development, 1(1), 90-107.
Koosimile, A. T., & Suping, S. M. (2015). An examination of the influence of globalisation on science education in Anglophone sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2358-2385.
Mchombo, S. (2016). Language, scientific knowledge, and the “context of learning” in African education. In Z. Babaci-Wilhite (Ed.), Human rights in language and STEM education (pp. 129-150). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Niyozov, S., & Dastambuev, N. (2012). Exploiting globalization while being exploited by it: Insights from post-Soviet education reforms in Central Asia. Comparative and International Education/Éducation Comparée et Internationale, 41(3), Article 3.
Pirbhai-Illich, F., Shauneen, P., & Fran, M. (2017). Culturally Responsive Pedagogies: Decolonization, Indigeneity and Interculturalism. In F. Pirbhai-Illich, P. Shauneen, & M. Fran (Eds.), Culturally Responsive Pedagogy (pp. 3-25). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Portnoi, L. M. (2016). Patterns of Educational Reform and Policy Borrowing. In L. M. Portnoi, Policy Borrowing and Reform in Education (pp. 175-198). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Raina, V. K. (1999). Indigenizing teacher education in developing countries: The Indian context. Prospects, 29(1), 5-25.
Shizha, E. (2014). Indigenous knowledge systems and the curriculum. In G. Emeagwali, & G. J. Sefa Dei (EDS.), African indigenous knowledge and the disciplines (pp. 113-129). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Shrestha, I. M., & Khanal, S. K. (2016). Indigenization of Higher Education: Reflections from Nepal. In J. Xing, & P.-S. Ng (Eds.), Indigenous Culture, Education and Globalization (pp. 137-157). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1-34.
Swift, D. (1992). Indigenous knowledge in the service of science and technology in developing countries. Studies in Science Education, 20(1), 1-28.
Tyokumber, E. T. (2010). Does science education in developing countries really count? The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 91(4), 432-437.
EDUPIJ is indexed in ERIC now.
►EDUPIJ is included in The Philosopher’s Index (Coverage: Volume 5, 2016 & forward).
The Philosopher’s Index is the premiere bibliographic database covering worldwide research in all subject areas of philosophy.
Thank you so much to the editorial board members, authors and reviewers for their contribution to Educational Process: International Journal.